评估两种散光多焦人工晶体模型 5 年后的长期旋转稳定性和功能表现。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20241002-05
Maximilian K Köppe, Gerd U Auffarth, Hyeck-Soo Son, Timur M Yildirim, Ramin Khoramnia
{"title":"评估两种散光多焦人工晶体模型 5 年后的长期旋转稳定性和功能表现。","authors":"Maximilian K Köppe, Gerd U Auffarth, Hyeck-Soo Son, Timur M Yildirim, Ramin Khoramnia","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20241002-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess visual outcomes and stability of lens alignment more than 3 years after implanting either the AT Lisa Tri Toric (Carl Zeiss Meditec) or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) intraocular lens (IOL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had received either the AT Lisa Tri Toric or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOL were included in the study. The average follow-up period was 5.4 years for the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 7.9 years for the Acrysof IQ Restor group. The examinations covered included: subjective refraction, monocular and binocular corrected and uncorrected visual acuity at far (4 m), intermediate (75 cm), and near (40 cm) distances, binocular best-corrected defocus curve analysis (4 m), contrast sensitivity evaluation, assessment of IOL axial position, and presence of positive dysphotopsia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 eyes were evaluated. Both groups exhibited good long-term lens axial stability. The AT Lisa Tri Toric group had a mean misalignment of 4.8 ± 3.2° from the preoperatively determined axis, whereas the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group had an average misalignment of 5.4 ± 4.5° (no statistically significant difference, <i>P</i> = .578). Mean achieved spherical equivalent was -0.19 ± 0.36 diopters (D) for the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 0.15 ± 0.39 D for the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group. In the AT Lisa Tri Toric group, 18 eyes (72%) achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/25 Snellen) or better, compared to 15 eyes (88%) in the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group. Overall, 21 eyes (84%) in the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 14 eyes (83%) in the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group achieved a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction between -0.50 and +0.50 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the AT Lisa Tri Toric and the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOLs showed good long-term stability and functional outcomes. They proved to be effective options for restoring vision at far, intermediate, and near distances, providing a viable solution for presbyopia correction even several years after implantation. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(11):e845-e853.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 11","pages":"e845-e853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Long-term Rotational Stability and Functional Performance of Two Toric Multifocal IOL Models Beyond 5 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian K Köppe, Gerd U Auffarth, Hyeck-Soo Son, Timur M Yildirim, Ramin Khoramnia\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20241002-05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess visual outcomes and stability of lens alignment more than 3 years after implanting either the AT Lisa Tri Toric (Carl Zeiss Meditec) or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) intraocular lens (IOL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had received either the AT Lisa Tri Toric or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOL were included in the study. The average follow-up period was 5.4 years for the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 7.9 years for the Acrysof IQ Restor group. The examinations covered included: subjective refraction, monocular and binocular corrected and uncorrected visual acuity at far (4 m), intermediate (75 cm), and near (40 cm) distances, binocular best-corrected defocus curve analysis (4 m), contrast sensitivity evaluation, assessment of IOL axial position, and presence of positive dysphotopsia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 eyes were evaluated. Both groups exhibited good long-term lens axial stability. The AT Lisa Tri Toric group had a mean misalignment of 4.8 ± 3.2° from the preoperatively determined axis, whereas the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group had an average misalignment of 5.4 ± 4.5° (no statistically significant difference, <i>P</i> = .578). Mean achieved spherical equivalent was -0.19 ± 0.36 diopters (D) for the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 0.15 ± 0.39 D for the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group. In the AT Lisa Tri Toric group, 18 eyes (72%) achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/25 Snellen) or better, compared to 15 eyes (88%) in the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group. Overall, 21 eyes (84%) in the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 14 eyes (83%) in the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group achieved a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction between -0.50 and +0.50 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the AT Lisa Tri Toric and the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOLs showed good long-term stability and functional outcomes. They proved to be effective options for restoring vision at far, intermediate, and near distances, providing a viable solution for presbyopia correction even several years after implantation. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(11):e845-e853.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 11\",\"pages\":\"e845-e853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241002-05\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241002-05","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估植入AT Lisa Tri Toric(卡尔蔡司医疗公司)或Acrysof IQ Restor Toric(爱尔康实验室公司)眼内人工晶体(IOL)3年多后的视觉效果和晶体排列的稳定性:研究对象包括接受过 AT Lisa Tri Toric 或 Acrysof IQ Restor Toric 人工晶体的患者。AT Lisa Tri Toric 组的平均随访时间为 5.4 年,Acrysof IQ Restor 组的平均随访时间为 7.9 年。检查内容包括:主观屈光度、远距离(4 米)、中距离(75 厘米)和近距离(40 厘米)的单眼和双眼校正和未校正视力、双眼最佳校正离焦曲线分析(4 米)、对比敏感度评估、人工晶体轴向位置评估以及是否存在阳性视力障碍:共评估了 42 只眼睛。两组均表现出良好的长期镜片轴向稳定性。AT Lisa Tri Toric 组与术前确定的轴线的平均偏差为 4.8 ± 3.2°,而 Acrysof IQ Restor Toric 组的平均偏差为 5.4 ± 4.5°(差异无统计学意义,P = .578)。AT Lisa Tri Toric 组的平均球面等效度数为 -0.19 ± 0.36 屈光度 (D),Acrysof IQ Restor Toric 组的平均球面等效度数为 0.15 ± 0.39 屈光度 (D)。在 AT Lisa Tri Toric 组中,18 只眼睛(72%)的未矫正远距离视力达到了最小分辨角的 0.10 对数(20/25 Snellen)或更高,而在 Acrysof IQ Restor Toric 组中,有 15 只眼睛(88%)的未矫正远距离视力达到了最小分辨角的 0.10 对数(20/25 Snellen)或更高。总体而言,AT Lisa Tri Toric 组有 21 只眼睛(84%)和 Acrysof IQ Restor Toric 组有 14 只眼睛(83%)的术后球面等效屈光度在 -0.50 到 +0.50 D 之间:AT Lisa Tri Toric 和 Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOL 均显示出良好的长期稳定性和功能性。它们被证明是恢复远、中、近距离视力的有效选择,为老花眼矫正提供了可行的解决方案,即使是在植入数年后。[J Refract Surg. 2024;40(11):e845-e853]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Long-term Rotational Stability and Functional Performance of Two Toric Multifocal IOL Models Beyond 5 Years.

Purpose: To assess visual outcomes and stability of lens alignment more than 3 years after implanting either the AT Lisa Tri Toric (Carl Zeiss Meditec) or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods: Patients who had received either the AT Lisa Tri Toric or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOL were included in the study. The average follow-up period was 5.4 years for the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 7.9 years for the Acrysof IQ Restor group. The examinations covered included: subjective refraction, monocular and binocular corrected and uncorrected visual acuity at far (4 m), intermediate (75 cm), and near (40 cm) distances, binocular best-corrected defocus curve analysis (4 m), contrast sensitivity evaluation, assessment of IOL axial position, and presence of positive dysphotopsia.

Results: A total of 42 eyes were evaluated. Both groups exhibited good long-term lens axial stability. The AT Lisa Tri Toric group had a mean misalignment of 4.8 ± 3.2° from the preoperatively determined axis, whereas the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group had an average misalignment of 5.4 ± 4.5° (no statistically significant difference, P = .578). Mean achieved spherical equivalent was -0.19 ± 0.36 diopters (D) for the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 0.15 ± 0.39 D for the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group. In the AT Lisa Tri Toric group, 18 eyes (72%) achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/25 Snellen) or better, compared to 15 eyes (88%) in the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group. Overall, 21 eyes (84%) in the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 14 eyes (83%) in the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group achieved a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction between -0.50 and +0.50 D.

Conclusions: Both the AT Lisa Tri Toric and the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOLs showed good long-term stability and functional outcomes. They proved to be effective options for restoring vision at far, intermediate, and near distances, providing a viable solution for presbyopia correction even several years after implantation. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(11):e845-e853.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Visual and Safety Outcomes of Refractive Correction Procedures Following Lens Removal for Residual Refractive Error: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 2024 Reviewers. A Nomogram to Improve the Predictability of High Myopic Astigmatism in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery. Application of the Taylor Diagram in Evaluating the Performance of IOL Formulas. Clarification of Femtosecond Laser Terminology: Energy, Fluence, Dose.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1