融合机器人辅助胸腔镜胸段切除术的安慰者和床旁外科医生的学习曲线:最初 100 例病例的启示。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02957-0
Yuki Uno, Shinya Tane, Yugo Tanaka, Midori Takanashi, Takefumi Doi, Hiroyuki Ogawa, Daisuke Hokka, Yoshimasa Maniwa
{"title":"融合机器人辅助胸腔镜胸段切除术的安慰者和床旁外科医生的学习曲线:最初 100 例病例的启示。","authors":"Yuki Uno, Shinya Tane, Yugo Tanaka, Midori Takanashi, Takefumi Doi, Hiroyuki Ogawa, Daisuke Hokka, Yoshimasa Maniwa","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02957-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the learning curve of segmentectomy using the \"fused surgery\" approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from 100 patients who underwent segmentectomy via fused robot-assisted thoracoscopy at our institution between September 2020 and February 2024. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum of the operative times in all cases and was analyzed separately for simple and complex segmentectomies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying the cumulative sum method to all cases, we obtained a graph of the operative time that showed three well-differentiated phases: phase 1 (n = 23), the initial learning phase; phase 2 (n = 28), the increased competence phase; and phase 3 (n = 49), the highest skill phase. Comparing phases 1 and 2 with phase 3, we found significant differences in operative time (P < 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed in bleeding or rate of postoperative complications. We observed a significant reduction in operative time after 25 simple segmentectomies and 22 complex segmentectomies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data suggested that the inflection point of the learning curve was achieved in 51 cases. Complex segmentectomy requires the same cases to achieve the same level of competence as simple segmentectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning curve of consolers and bedside surgeons fused robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: insights from the initial 100 cases.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Uno, Shinya Tane, Yugo Tanaka, Midori Takanashi, Takefumi Doi, Hiroyuki Ogawa, Daisuke Hokka, Yoshimasa Maniwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-024-02957-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the learning curve of segmentectomy using the \\\"fused surgery\\\" approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from 100 patients who underwent segmentectomy via fused robot-assisted thoracoscopy at our institution between September 2020 and February 2024. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum of the operative times in all cases and was analyzed separately for simple and complex segmentectomies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying the cumulative sum method to all cases, we obtained a graph of the operative time that showed three well-differentiated phases: phase 1 (n = 23), the initial learning phase; phase 2 (n = 28), the increased competence phase; and phase 3 (n = 49), the highest skill phase. Comparing phases 1 and 2 with phase 3, we found significant differences in operative time (P < 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed in bleeding or rate of postoperative complications. We observed a significant reduction in operative time after 25 simple segmentectomies and 22 complex segmentectomies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data suggested that the inflection point of the learning curve was achieved in 51 cases. Complex segmentectomy requires the same cases to achieve the same level of competence as simple segmentectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02957-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02957-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了使用 "融合手术 "方法进行肺段切除术的学习曲线:我们回顾性地收集了2020年9月至2024年2月期间在我院通过融合机器人辅助胸腔镜进行肺段切除术的100例患者的数据。我们使用所有病例的手术时间累计总和来评估学习曲线,并分别对简单和复杂的节段切除术进行分析:对所有病例采用累计总和法后,我们得到了一张手术时间曲线图,该图显示了三个不同的阶段:第一阶段(23 人),初始学习阶段;第二阶段(28 人),能力提高阶段;第三阶段(49 人),最高技能阶段。将第 1 和第 2 阶段与第 3 阶段进行比较,我们发现在手术时间上存在显著差异(P 结论):数据表明,51 个病例达到了学习曲线的拐点。复杂节段切除术与简单节段切除术需要相同的病例才能达到相同的能力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning curve of consolers and bedside surgeons fused robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: insights from the initial 100 cases.

Purpose: This study examined the learning curve of segmentectomy using the "fused surgery" approach.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 100 patients who underwent segmentectomy via fused robot-assisted thoracoscopy at our institution between September 2020 and February 2024. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum of the operative times in all cases and was analyzed separately for simple and complex segmentectomies.

Results: After applying the cumulative sum method to all cases, we obtained a graph of the operative time that showed three well-differentiated phases: phase 1 (n = 23), the initial learning phase; phase 2 (n = 28), the increased competence phase; and phase 3 (n = 49), the highest skill phase. Comparing phases 1 and 2 with phase 3, we found significant differences in operative time (P < 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed in bleeding or rate of postoperative complications. We observed a significant reduction in operative time after 25 simple segmentectomies and 22 complex segmentectomies.

Conclusions: The data suggested that the inflection point of the learning curve was achieved in 51 cases. Complex segmentectomy requires the same cases to achieve the same level of competence as simple segmentectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
The assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy benefits after D3 lymphadenectomy in patients with colon cancer: a propensity score matching study. Learning curve of consolers and bedside surgeons fused robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: insights from the initial 100 cases. Mechanisms of polyglycolic acid sheet-induced abdominal wall adhesions in hamsters. Evaluation of intestinal wall closure using vessel-sealing technology versus conventional closure: an in vivo study. Postoperative pain management using high-dose oral acetaminophen for enhanced recovery after colorectal cancer surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1