用于覆盖义齿的氧化锆和铸金根冠的拉伸粘接强度、配合精度和失效类型。

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08
E Muehlemann, I Lanvancy, A Krasniqi, V Colombo, F J Strauss, N Dydyk, E Armağan, M Özcan
{"title":"用于覆盖义齿的氧化锆和铸金根冠的拉伸粘接强度、配合精度和失效类型。","authors":"E Muehlemann, I Lanvancy, A Krasniqi, V Colombo, F J Strauss, N Dydyk, E Armağan, M Özcan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the tensile strength, dislodgement forces, marginal gap and failure types between digitally fabricated zirconia root copings and conventionally manufactured cast gold root copings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extracted human teeth (N=30) were prepared for the root copings and randomly divided into 2 groups: (1)zirconia root copings(ZC) and gold root copings(GC). The specimens were tested for tensile bond strength and dislodgement forces in a universal testing machine and the types of the coping failures modes were analyzed. In addition, the marginal gap was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean tensile bond strength in the total horizontal adhesive area for ZC group was 7.5±2.8MPa and for GC group 10.5±4.8 MPa(p⟩0.05). The mean dislodgement forces for the ZC and GC groups were 242±107N and 311±118N, respectively and with no significant differences between the groups (p=0.12). The mean vertical marginal gap in the ZC group amounted to 27±11.05μm, while in the GC group it was 35.33±10.49μm, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.058). Mixed failure modes were more common (93%) in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of all tested parameters, the zirconia root copings were comparable to the gold copings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"384-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tensile Bond Strength, Fit Accuracy and Failure Types of Zirconia and Cast Gold Root Copings for Overdentures.\",\"authors\":\"E Muehlemann, I Lanvancy, A Krasniqi, V Colombo, F J Strauss, N Dydyk, E Armağan, M Özcan\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the tensile strength, dislodgement forces, marginal gap and failure types between digitally fabricated zirconia root copings and conventionally manufactured cast gold root copings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extracted human teeth (N=30) were prepared for the root copings and randomly divided into 2 groups: (1)zirconia root copings(ZC) and gold root copings(GC). The specimens were tested for tensile bond strength and dislodgement forces in a universal testing machine and the types of the coping failures modes were analyzed. In addition, the marginal gap was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean tensile bond strength in the total horizontal adhesive area for ZC group was 7.5±2.8MPa and for GC group 10.5±4.8 MPa(p⟩0.05). The mean dislodgement forces for the ZC and GC groups were 242±107N and 311±118N, respectively and with no significant differences between the groups (p=0.12). The mean vertical marginal gap in the ZC group amounted to 27±11.05μm, while in the GC group it was 35.33±10.49μm, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.058). Mixed failure modes were more common (93%) in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of all tested parameters, the zirconia root copings were comparable to the gold copings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"384-391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2685Muehlemann08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较数字制作的氧化锆根锁和传统制造的铸金根锁的拉伸强度、脱落力、边缘间隙和失效类型:拔出的人类牙齿(N=30)制备牙冠,随机分为两组:(1) 氧化锆牙冠(ZC)和金牙冠(GC)。在万能试验机上对试样进行拉伸粘接强度和脱落力测试,并分析了牙冠失效模式的类型。此外,还测量了边缘间隙。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和皮尔逊相关检验:ZC组水平粘接区的平均拉伸粘接强度为7.5±2.8MPa,GC组为10.5±4.8MPa(p⟩0.05)。ZC 组和 GC 组的平均脱位力分别为 242±107N 和 311±118N,组间差异不显著(p=0.12)。ZC 组的平均垂直边缘间隙为 27±11.05μm,而 GC 组为 35.33±10.49μm,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.058)。两组中混合失效模式更常见(93%):就所有测试参数而言,氧化锆根锁与金根锁相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tensile Bond Strength, Fit Accuracy and Failure Types of Zirconia and Cast Gold Root Copings for Overdentures.

Aim: To compare the tensile strength, dislodgement forces, marginal gap and failure types between digitally fabricated zirconia root copings and conventionally manufactured cast gold root copings.

Methods: Extracted human teeth (N=30) were prepared for the root copings and randomly divided into 2 groups: (1)zirconia root copings(ZC) and gold root copings(GC). The specimens were tested for tensile bond strength and dislodgement forces in a universal testing machine and the types of the coping failures modes were analyzed. In addition, the marginal gap was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation test.

Results: Mean tensile bond strength in the total horizontal adhesive area for ZC group was 7.5±2.8MPa and for GC group 10.5±4.8 MPa(p⟩0.05). The mean dislodgement forces for the ZC and GC groups were 242±107N and 311±118N, respectively and with no significant differences between the groups (p=0.12). The mean vertical marginal gap in the ZC group amounted to 27±11.05μm, while in the GC group it was 35.33±10.49μm, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.058). Mixed failure modes were more common (93%) in both groups.

Conclusions: In terms of all tested parameters, the zirconia root copings were comparable to the gold copings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Intra-Oral Scanners for Full Crown Tooth Preparations with Subgingival Margins: A Systematic Review. Description and Durability of the Various Direct Restoration Techniques in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A Systematic Review. Does the Learning Curve for Intraoral Scanning Vary Depending on the Device? Influence of Surface Roughness on the Adhesion of Hydroxyapatite Coatings to Titanium and Titanium Alloy Surfaces: A Systematic Review of in vitro Experimental Studies. Performance of Fiberglass Posts Versus Fiber- Reinforced Resin Composites in Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Without Ferrule: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1