主导决策风格与护理管理者创造力之间的关系:一项横断面研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02397-8
Eman Kamel Hossny, Hammad S Alotaibi
{"title":"主导决策风格与护理管理者创造力之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Eman Kamel Hossny, Hammad S Alotaibi","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02397-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the connection between dominant decision-making style and creativity among nursing managers.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The dominant style of decision-making nursing managers use definitely affects the quality of decisions. Also, in another way, it can develop a skill of creative thinking that may influence the entire health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 229 nursing managers in four university hospitals were gathered using a cross-sectional study methodology and questionnaires about general decision-making styles and managerial creativity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>nursing managers are highly creative. In general, the dominant decision-making style is rational and is correlated positively with creativity. Dependent style is the second one, while it is correlated negatively and significantly with creativity. Intuitive style is the third one and correlated negatively but is insignificant with creativity. Regression analysis revealed that only three styles have an effect on creativity: rational (positive), dependent (negative), and avoidant (negative), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most dominant style is rational, which has the highest effect, which is positive on creativity. The dependent is the second dominant style and has a negative effect. Whereas intuitive is the third dominant style and did not have any effect on creativity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"829"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between dominant decision-making style and creativity of nursing managers: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Eman Kamel Hossny, Hammad S Alotaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-024-02397-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the connection between dominant decision-making style and creativity among nursing managers.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The dominant style of decision-making nursing managers use definitely affects the quality of decisions. Also, in another way, it can develop a skill of creative thinking that may influence the entire health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 229 nursing managers in four university hospitals were gathered using a cross-sectional study methodology and questionnaires about general decision-making styles and managerial creativity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>nursing managers are highly creative. In general, the dominant decision-making style is rational and is correlated positively with creativity. Dependent style is the second one, while it is correlated negatively and significantly with creativity. Intuitive style is the third one and correlated negatively but is insignificant with creativity. Regression analysis revealed that only three styles have an effect on creativity: rational (positive), dependent (negative), and avoidant (negative), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most dominant style is rational, which has the highest effect, which is positive on creativity. The dependent is the second dominant style and has a negative effect. Whereas intuitive is the third dominant style and did not have any effect on creativity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02397-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02397-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨主导决策风格与护理管理者创造力之间的联系:本研究旨在探讨护理管理者的主导决策风格与创造力之间的关系:背景:护理管理者使用的主导决策风格肯定会影响决策的质量。背景:护理管理者所采用的主导决策风格肯定会影响决策的质量,而且从另一个角度来说,它可以培养一种创造性思维技能,从而影响整个医疗系统:方法:采用横断面研究方法和有关一般决策风格和管理创造力的调查问卷,收集了四所大学医院 229 名护理管理人员的数据。一般来说,占主导地位的决策风格是理性,与创造性呈正相关。第二种是依赖型风格,与创造性呈显著负相关。直觉型风格排在第三位,与创造力呈负相关,但不显著。回归分析表明,只有三种风格对创造力有影响:理性(正向)、依赖(负向)和回避(负向):结论:理性是最主要的风格,对创造力的影响最大,是积极的。依赖型是第二主导风格,具有负面影响。直觉是第三主导风格,对创造力没有任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between dominant decision-making style and creativity of nursing managers: A cross-sectional study.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the connection between dominant decision-making style and creativity among nursing managers.

Background: The dominant style of decision-making nursing managers use definitely affects the quality of decisions. Also, in another way, it can develop a skill of creative thinking that may influence the entire health care system.

Methods: Data from 229 nursing managers in four university hospitals were gathered using a cross-sectional study methodology and questionnaires about general decision-making styles and managerial creativity.

Results: nursing managers are highly creative. In general, the dominant decision-making style is rational and is correlated positively with creativity. Dependent style is the second one, while it is correlated negatively and significantly with creativity. Intuitive style is the third one and correlated negatively but is insignificant with creativity. Regression analysis revealed that only three styles have an effect on creativity: rational (positive), dependent (negative), and avoidant (negative), respectively.

Conclusion: The most dominant style is rational, which has the highest effect, which is positive on creativity. The dependent is the second dominant style and has a negative effect. Whereas intuitive is the third dominant style and did not have any effect on creativity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Harnessing the power of social media: transforming nursing education for unmatched academic success. Factors influencing job performance of nurses in COVID-19 care: a study in Egypt. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Motivation Scale (s-CPRMS): a cross sectional study. Magnitude of workplace violence and its associated factors against nurses working in public hospitals of Western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. The heterogeneous depression trajectory and its predictors in coronary heart disease patients undergoing home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1