以 "人模人样 "的方法预测腰椎间盘微切除术和腰椎病理疗后的个体恢复情况。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.003
Stijn J Willems, Andrew J Kittelson, Servan Rooker, Martijn W Heymans, Thomas J Hoogeboom, Michel W Coppieters, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
{"title":"以 \"人模人样 \"的方法预测腰椎间盘微切除术和腰椎病理疗后的个体恢复情况。","authors":"Stijn J Willems, Andrew J Kittelson, Servan Rooker, Martijn W Heymans, Thomas J Hoogeboom, Michel W Coppieters, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Lumbar microdiscectomy is an effective treatment for short-term pain relief and improvements in disability in patients with lumbar radiculopathy, however, many patients experience residual pain and long-term disability. The 'people like me' approach seeks to enhance personalized prognosis and treatment effectiveness, utilizing historical data from similar patients to forecast individual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary objective was to develop and test the 'people-like-me' approach for leg pain intensity and disability at 12-month follow-up after lumbar microdiscectomy and post-operative physical therapy. The secondary objective was to verify the clinical utility of the prediction tool via case vignettes.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>A 12-month prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients (N=618, mean age: 44.7) with lumbar radiculopathy who undergo a lumbar microdiscectomy and postoperative physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Leg pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) were measured at 12-months following surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predictors were selected from data collected in routine practice before and 3-months after lumbar microdiscectomy. Predictive mean matching was used to select matches. Predictions were developed using pre-operative data alone or combined with 3-month post-operative data. The prediction performance was evaluated for bias (difference between predicted and actual outcomes), coverage (proportion of actual outcomes within prediction intervals), and precision (accuracy of predictions) using leave-one-out cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the 'people-like-me' approach using pre-operative data showed accurate coverage and minimal average bias. However, precision based on pre-operative data alone was limited. Incorporating 3-month post-operative data alongside pre-operative predictors significantly enhanced prognostic precision for both leg pain and disability. Including post-operative data, leg pain prediction accuracy improved by 43% and disability by 23% compared to the sample mean. Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> values improved from 0.04 to 0.21 for leg pain, and from 0.07 to 0.34 for disability, enhancing model precision. The effectiveness of this method was highlighted in two case vignettes, illustrating its application in similar patient scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 'people-like-me' approach generated an accurate prognosis of 12-months outcomes following lumbar discectomy and physical therapy. Scheduling a three-month post-operative follow-up to evaluate the course, and refine therapy plans and expectations for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy would be recommended to assist clinicians and patients in more personalized healthcare planning and expectation setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 'people-like-me' approach to predict individual recovery following lumbar microdiscectomy and physical therapy for lumbar radiculopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Stijn J Willems, Andrew J Kittelson, Servan Rooker, Martijn W Heymans, Thomas J Hoogeboom, Michel W Coppieters, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Lumbar microdiscectomy is an effective treatment for short-term pain relief and improvements in disability in patients with lumbar radiculopathy, however, many patients experience residual pain and long-term disability. The 'people like me' approach seeks to enhance personalized prognosis and treatment effectiveness, utilizing historical data from similar patients to forecast individual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary objective was to develop and test the 'people-like-me' approach for leg pain intensity and disability at 12-month follow-up after lumbar microdiscectomy and post-operative physical therapy. The secondary objective was to verify the clinical utility of the prediction tool via case vignettes.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>A 12-month prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients (N=618, mean age: 44.7) with lumbar radiculopathy who undergo a lumbar microdiscectomy and postoperative physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Leg pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) were measured at 12-months following surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predictors were selected from data collected in routine practice before and 3-months after lumbar microdiscectomy. Predictive mean matching was used to select matches. Predictions were developed using pre-operative data alone or combined with 3-month post-operative data. The prediction performance was evaluated for bias (difference between predicted and actual outcomes), coverage (proportion of actual outcomes within prediction intervals), and precision (accuracy of predictions) using leave-one-out cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the 'people-like-me' approach using pre-operative data showed accurate coverage and minimal average bias. However, precision based on pre-operative data alone was limited. Incorporating 3-month post-operative data alongside pre-operative predictors significantly enhanced prognostic precision for both leg pain and disability. Including post-operative data, leg pain prediction accuracy improved by 43% and disability by 23% compared to the sample mean. Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> values improved from 0.04 to 0.21 for leg pain, and from 0.07 to 0.34 for disability, enhancing model precision. The effectiveness of this method was highlighted in two case vignettes, illustrating its application in similar patient scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 'people-like-me' approach generated an accurate prognosis of 12-months outcomes following lumbar discectomy and physical therapy. Scheduling a three-month post-operative follow-up to evaluate the course, and refine therapy plans and expectations for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy would be recommended to assist clinicians and patients in more personalized healthcare planning and expectation setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景情况:腰椎显微椎间盘切除术是一种有效的治疗方法,可在短期内缓解腰椎病患者的疼痛并改善其残疾状况,但许多患者会出现残余疼痛和长期残疾。目的:主要目的是开发和测试 "像我一样的人 "方法,用于腰椎间盘切除术和术后理疗后 12 个月随访的腿部疼痛强度和残疾情况。次要目标是通过案例验证预测工具的临床实用性:为期12个月的前瞻性队列研究:患者样本:接受腰椎显微椎间盘切除术和术后物理治疗的腰椎根管病患者(N=618,平均年龄:44.7):结果测量:在术后 12 个月测量腿部疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)和残疾程度(罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷):方法:从腰椎显微椎间盘切除术前和术后 3 个月的常规数据中筛选出预测因子。采用预测均值匹配法选择匹配指标。仅使用术前数据或结合术后 3 个月的数据进行预测。预测结果的偏差(预测结果与实际结果之间的差异)、覆盖率(预测区间内实际结果的比例)和精确度(预测的准确性)采用留空交叉验证法进行评估:总体而言,使用术前数据的 "类人 "方法显示出准确的覆盖率和最小的平均偏差。但是,仅根据术前数据得出的精确度有限。将术后 3 个月的数据与术前预测指标结合起来,可显著提高腿部疼痛和残疾的预后精确度。与样本平均值相比,纳入术后数据后,腿痛预测准确性提高了 43%,残疾预测准确性提高了 23%。腿痛的调整 R2 值从 0.04 提高到 0.21,残疾的调整 R2 值从 0.07 提高到 0.34,从而提高了模型的精确度。该方法的有效性在两个案例中得到了强调,说明了它在类似患者场景中的应用:结论:"像我一样的人 "方法能准确预测腰椎间盘切除术和物理治疗后 12 个月的效果。建议为接受腰椎间盘微切除术的患者安排三个月的术后随访,以评估疗程、完善治疗计划和期望值,从而帮助临床医生和患者制定更加个性化的医疗保健计划和期望值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A 'people-like-me' approach to predict individual recovery following lumbar microdiscectomy and physical therapy for lumbar radiculopathy.

Background context: Lumbar microdiscectomy is an effective treatment for short-term pain relief and improvements in disability in patients with lumbar radiculopathy, however, many patients experience residual pain and long-term disability. The 'people like me' approach seeks to enhance personalized prognosis and treatment effectiveness, utilizing historical data from similar patients to forecast individual outcomes.

Purpose: The primary objective was to develop and test the 'people-like-me' approach for leg pain intensity and disability at 12-month follow-up after lumbar microdiscectomy and post-operative physical therapy. The secondary objective was to verify the clinical utility of the prediction tool via case vignettes.

Study design/setting: A 12-month prospective cohort study.

Patient sample: Patients (N=618, mean age: 44.7) with lumbar radiculopathy who undergo a lumbar microdiscectomy and postoperative physical therapy.

Outcome measures: Leg pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) were measured at 12-months following surgery.

Methods: Predictors were selected from data collected in routine practice before and 3-months after lumbar microdiscectomy. Predictive mean matching was used to select matches. Predictions were developed using pre-operative data alone or combined with 3-month post-operative data. The prediction performance was evaluated for bias (difference between predicted and actual outcomes), coverage (proportion of actual outcomes within prediction intervals), and precision (accuracy of predictions) using leave-one-out cross-validation.

Results: Overall, the 'people-like-me' approach using pre-operative data showed accurate coverage and minimal average bias. However, precision based on pre-operative data alone was limited. Incorporating 3-month post-operative data alongside pre-operative predictors significantly enhanced prognostic precision for both leg pain and disability. Including post-operative data, leg pain prediction accuracy improved by 43% and disability by 23% compared to the sample mean. Adjusted R2 values improved from 0.04 to 0.21 for leg pain, and from 0.07 to 0.34 for disability, enhancing model precision. The effectiveness of this method was highlighted in two case vignettes, illustrating its application in similar patient scenarios.

Conclusion: The 'people-like-me' approach generated an accurate prognosis of 12-months outcomes following lumbar discectomy and physical therapy. Scheduling a three-month post-operative follow-up to evaluate the course, and refine therapy plans and expectations for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy would be recommended to assist clinicians and patients in more personalized healthcare planning and expectation setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
MRI spine request form enhancement and auto protocoling using a secure institutional large language model. A 'people-like-me' approach to predict individual recovery following lumbar microdiscectomy and physical therapy for lumbar radiculopathy. Beyond a ferroptosis inducer: erastin can suppress nutrient deprivation induced cell death in the intervertebral disc. Civilian ballistic spinal cord injuries versus blunt trauma: comparative analysis of clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes. Genome-wide methylation association study in monozygotic twins discordant for curve severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1