比较锝-99m 和铊-201 放射性同位素在心脏 SPECT 成像中的散射校正方法的性能。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_40_24
Mahsa Noori-Asl, Maryam Eghbal
{"title":"比较锝-99m 和铊-201 放射性同位素在心脏 SPECT 成像中的散射校正方法的性能。","authors":"Mahsa Noori-Asl, Maryam Eghbal","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_40_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the performance of dual-energy window (DEW) and triple-energy window (TEW) scatter correction methods in cardiac SPECT imaging with technetium-99m (Tc-99m) and thallium-201 (Tl-201) radioisotopes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The SIMIND Monte Carlo program was used to simulate the imaging system and produce the required projections. Two phantoms, including the simple cardiac phantom and the NCAT phantom, were used to evaluate the scatter correction methods. The simulations were repeated 5 times for each phantom and finally, the mean values obtained from these 5 tests were used in the analysis of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The obtained results from this study show that in the case of both investigated phantoms, the use of correction methods leads to improve the contrast of the images obtained from Tc-99m and Tl-201 radioisotopes. In the case of the simple cardiac phantom, the use of DEW and TEW correction methods leads to a relative increase in image contrast of about 23.88% and 12.23% for <sup>99m</sup>Tc radioisotope and about 29.19% and 20.98% for <sup>201</sup>Tl radioisotope, respectively. This relative increase in the case of the NCAT phantom is about 22.48% and 19.43% for <sup>99m</sup>Tc radioisotope and about 27.74% and 24.74% for <sup>201</sup>Tl radioisotope, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the obtained results, despite the higher contrast of the noncorrected images of <sup>99m</sup>Tc radioisotope, the relative increase in contrast of the corrected images of <sup>201</sup>Tl radioisotope is more than that of <sup>99m</sup>Tc radioisotope. Furthermore, for both radioisotopes, the relative increase related to the DEW method is higher than the TEW method.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 3","pages":"464-472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Performance of Scatter Correction Methods in Cardiac SPECT Imaging with Technetium-99m and Thallium-201 Radioisotopes.\",\"authors\":\"Mahsa Noori-Asl, Maryam Eghbal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_40_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the performance of dual-energy window (DEW) and triple-energy window (TEW) scatter correction methods in cardiac SPECT imaging with technetium-99m (Tc-99m) and thallium-201 (Tl-201) radioisotopes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The SIMIND Monte Carlo program was used to simulate the imaging system and produce the required projections. Two phantoms, including the simple cardiac phantom and the NCAT phantom, were used to evaluate the scatter correction methods. The simulations were repeated 5 times for each phantom and finally, the mean values obtained from these 5 tests were used in the analysis of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The obtained results from this study show that in the case of both investigated phantoms, the use of correction methods leads to improve the contrast of the images obtained from Tc-99m and Tl-201 radioisotopes. In the case of the simple cardiac phantom, the use of DEW and TEW correction methods leads to a relative increase in image contrast of about 23.88% and 12.23% for <sup>99m</sup>Tc radioisotope and about 29.19% and 20.98% for <sup>201</sup>Tl radioisotope, respectively. This relative increase in the case of the NCAT phantom is about 22.48% and 19.43% for <sup>99m</sup>Tc radioisotope and about 27.74% and 24.74% for <sup>201</sup>Tl radioisotope, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the obtained results, despite the higher contrast of the noncorrected images of <sup>99m</sup>Tc radioisotope, the relative increase in contrast of the corrected images of <sup>201</sup>Tl radioisotope is more than that of <sup>99m</sup>Tc radioisotope. Furthermore, for both radioisotopes, the relative increase related to the DEW method is higher than the TEW method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"464-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_40_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_40_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估双能量窗(DEW)和三能量窗(TEW)散射校正方法在使用锝-99m(Tc-99m)和铊-201(Tl-201)放射性同位素进行心脏SPECT成像时的性能:使用 SIMIND Monte Carlo 程序模拟成像系统并生成所需的投影。使用两个模型(包括简单心脏模型和 NCAT 模型)来评估散射校正方法。每个模型重复模拟 5 次,最后将这 5 次测试得到的平均值用于结果分析:结果:研究结果表明,在两种研究模型中,使用校正方法都能提高 Tc-99m 和 Tl-201 放射性同位素图像的对比度。在简单心脏模型中,使用 DEW 和 TEW 校正方法可使 99mTc 放射性同位素的图像对比度分别提高约 23.88% 和 12.23%,201Tl 放射性同位素的图像对比度分别提高约 29.19% 和 20.98%。在 NCAT 模型中,99m锝放射性同位素的相对增加率分别约为 22.48% 和 19.43%,201Tl 放射性同位素的相对增加率分别约为 27.74% 和 24.74%:根据所得结果,尽管 99mTc 放射性同位素未校正图像的对比度较高,但 201Tl 放射性同位素校正图像对比度的相对增加幅度要大于 99mTc 放射性同位素。此外,对于这两种放射性同位素,DEW 方法的相对增加值都高于 TEW 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the Performance of Scatter Correction Methods in Cardiac SPECT Imaging with Technetium-99m and Thallium-201 Radioisotopes.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the performance of dual-energy window (DEW) and triple-energy window (TEW) scatter correction methods in cardiac SPECT imaging with technetium-99m (Tc-99m) and thallium-201 (Tl-201) radioisotopes.

Materials and methods: The SIMIND Monte Carlo program was used to simulate the imaging system and produce the required projections. Two phantoms, including the simple cardiac phantom and the NCAT phantom, were used to evaluate the scatter correction methods. The simulations were repeated 5 times for each phantom and finally, the mean values obtained from these 5 tests were used in the analysis of the results.

Results: The obtained results from this study show that in the case of both investigated phantoms, the use of correction methods leads to improve the contrast of the images obtained from Tc-99m and Tl-201 radioisotopes. In the case of the simple cardiac phantom, the use of DEW and TEW correction methods leads to a relative increase in image contrast of about 23.88% and 12.23% for 99mTc radioisotope and about 29.19% and 20.98% for 201Tl radioisotope, respectively. This relative increase in the case of the NCAT phantom is about 22.48% and 19.43% for 99mTc radioisotope and about 27.74% and 24.74% for 201Tl radioisotope, respectively.

Conclusion: According to the obtained results, despite the higher contrast of the noncorrected images of 99mTc radioisotope, the relative increase in contrast of the corrected images of 201Tl radioisotope is more than that of 99mTc radioisotope. Furthermore, for both radioisotopes, the relative increase related to the DEW method is higher than the TEW method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Segmentation-based Automated Calculation of Patient Size and Size-specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric Computed Tomography Scans. A Study on Radiation Level at the Treatment Plane Due to Induced Activity in Linear Accelerator Head. Advancements and Applications of Three-dimensional Printing Technology in Surgery. Agar-based Phantom for Evaluating Targeting of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Systems for Breast Ablation. An Analysis of Radiotherapy Machine Requirements in India: Impact of the Pandemic and Regional Disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1