Jan Risty Lucido Marzon, Vernie C Convicto, Melbagrace A Lapening, Andelson L Berondo, Angelina M Bacala
{"title":"使用 PRIMO 蒙特卡洛软件对 6 MV 光子束下的 Elekta Synergy 平台直列加速器进行验证。","authors":"Jan Risty Lucido Marzon, Vernie C Convicto, Melbagrace A Lapening, Andelson L Berondo, Angelina M Bacala","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_48_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective was to validate the initial beam parameters of the Davao Doctors Hospital's 6 MV Elekta Synergy Platform linac, which performs to the specification of the commissioning data per our records using the gamma-index analysis toolkit integrated inside PRIMO software.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In PRIMO, a sequence of optimization processes is performed, in which the measured and simulated percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral beam profiles at various depths are compared, using the stringent gamma-index passing rate at 1%/1 mm criteria (GPR11). Using four fields of sizes 3 cm × 3 cm, 4 cm × 4 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm, and 10 cm × 10 cm, the dose is calculated on a water phantom measuring 16.2 cm × 16.2 cm × 30.0 cm. In addition, one field of size 20 cm × 20 cm is used on a 50.0 cm × 50.0 cm × 30.0 cm water phantom with a bin size of 0.2 cm × 0.2 cm × 0.2 cm at a source-surface distance of 100.0 cm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For PDD and beam profiles comparison at the largest field size, the 6.5 MeV initial electron beam energy, 0.25 MeV full-width-half-maximum energy, 0.20 cm focal spot size, and 3° beam divergence tuned configuration yield GPR11 values of 94.0% and 97.7% (PRIMO PDD and lateral beam profile at 200 mm scan depth, respectively) with a statistical uncertainty of 2.9%. For lower field sizes, the GPR11 values are consistent at more than 90% for the PDD, whereas GPR11 values of 80.3% and 70.6% for the lateral beam profiles (at 15 mm and 200 mm scan depths) at 10 cm × 10 cm and 5 cm × 5 cm, respectively. The percentage difference between the measured and simulated <i>PDD</i> <sub>20,10</sub> ratios of not more than 2.45% is observed in all field settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These tuned beam parameters are remarkably in agreement with the suggested beam parameters listed on the PRIMO website for the 6 MV Elekta linac which was optimized with a different set of measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 3","pages":"410-418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Elekta Synergy Platform Linac at 6 MV Photon Beam using PRIMO Monte Carlo Software.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Risty Lucido Marzon, Vernie C Convicto, Melbagrace A Lapening, Andelson L Berondo, Angelina M Bacala\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_48_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective was to validate the initial beam parameters of the Davao Doctors Hospital's 6 MV Elekta Synergy Platform linac, which performs to the specification of the commissioning data per our records using the gamma-index analysis toolkit integrated inside PRIMO software.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In PRIMO, a sequence of optimization processes is performed, in which the measured and simulated percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral beam profiles at various depths are compared, using the stringent gamma-index passing rate at 1%/1 mm criteria (GPR11). Using four fields of sizes 3 cm × 3 cm, 4 cm × 4 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm, and 10 cm × 10 cm, the dose is calculated on a water phantom measuring 16.2 cm × 16.2 cm × 30.0 cm. In addition, one field of size 20 cm × 20 cm is used on a 50.0 cm × 50.0 cm × 30.0 cm water phantom with a bin size of 0.2 cm × 0.2 cm × 0.2 cm at a source-surface distance of 100.0 cm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For PDD and beam profiles comparison at the largest field size, the 6.5 MeV initial electron beam energy, 0.25 MeV full-width-half-maximum energy, 0.20 cm focal spot size, and 3° beam divergence tuned configuration yield GPR11 values of 94.0% and 97.7% (PRIMO PDD and lateral beam profile at 200 mm scan depth, respectively) with a statistical uncertainty of 2.9%. For lower field sizes, the GPR11 values are consistent at more than 90% for the PDD, whereas GPR11 values of 80.3% and 70.6% for the lateral beam profiles (at 15 mm and 200 mm scan depths) at 10 cm × 10 cm and 5 cm × 5 cm, respectively. The percentage difference between the measured and simulated <i>PDD</i> <sub>20,10</sub> ratios of not more than 2.45% is observed in all field settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These tuned beam parameters are remarkably in agreement with the suggested beam parameters listed on the PRIMO website for the 6 MV Elekta linac which was optimized with a different set of measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"410-418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_48_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_48_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the Elekta Synergy Platform Linac at 6 MV Photon Beam using PRIMO Monte Carlo Software.
Aims: The objective was to validate the initial beam parameters of the Davao Doctors Hospital's 6 MV Elekta Synergy Platform linac, which performs to the specification of the commissioning data per our records using the gamma-index analysis toolkit integrated inside PRIMO software.
Materials and methods: In PRIMO, a sequence of optimization processes is performed, in which the measured and simulated percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral beam profiles at various depths are compared, using the stringent gamma-index passing rate at 1%/1 mm criteria (GPR11). Using four fields of sizes 3 cm × 3 cm, 4 cm × 4 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm, and 10 cm × 10 cm, the dose is calculated on a water phantom measuring 16.2 cm × 16.2 cm × 30.0 cm. In addition, one field of size 20 cm × 20 cm is used on a 50.0 cm × 50.0 cm × 30.0 cm water phantom with a bin size of 0.2 cm × 0.2 cm × 0.2 cm at a source-surface distance of 100.0 cm.
Results: For PDD and beam profiles comparison at the largest field size, the 6.5 MeV initial electron beam energy, 0.25 MeV full-width-half-maximum energy, 0.20 cm focal spot size, and 3° beam divergence tuned configuration yield GPR11 values of 94.0% and 97.7% (PRIMO PDD and lateral beam profile at 200 mm scan depth, respectively) with a statistical uncertainty of 2.9%. For lower field sizes, the GPR11 values are consistent at more than 90% for the PDD, whereas GPR11 values of 80.3% and 70.6% for the lateral beam profiles (at 15 mm and 200 mm scan depths) at 10 cm × 10 cm and 5 cm × 5 cm, respectively. The percentage difference between the measured and simulated PDD20,10 ratios of not more than 2.45% is observed in all field settings.
Conclusions: These tuned beam parameters are remarkably in agreement with the suggested beam parameters listed on the PRIMO website for the 6 MV Elekta linac which was optimized with a different set of measurements.
期刊介绍:
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.