兴趣区域选择的方向如何影响分形维度?

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s11282-024-00786-y
Adem Pekince, Kader Azlağ Pekince, Yasin Yasa
{"title":"兴趣区域选择的方向如何影响分形维度?","authors":"Adem Pekince, Kader Azlağ Pekince, Yasin Yasa","doi":"10.1007/s11282-024-00786-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Introduction Fractal analysis (FA) is a computational method used to quantify the complex trabecular structure of bone. While FA has been widely applied in dentistry, there are challenges in standardizing the technique due to factors such as image resolution, region of interest (ROI) selection, and image processing. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the direction of ROI selection (DROIS) on fractal dimension (FD) calculations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Panoramic radiographs of 226 individuals aged 20-35 years were analyzed. ROIs were selected on the mandibular condyle, angular region, and mental region, and oriented at 0°, 22.5°, 45°, and 67.5° angles. FD was calculated using the box-counting method in ImageJ. The Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FD values differed significantly between the angled ROI groups in all three regions (Friedman test, p < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences in FD between most ROI orientations, except between 22.5° and 67.5° in the angular region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DROIS is an important factor that should be considered in FA studies to ensure reliable and reproducible FD values. Appropriate methodological choices can help account for the influence of DROIS on FD calculations..</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does the direction of region of interest selection affect the fractal dimension?\",\"authors\":\"Adem Pekince, Kader Azlağ Pekince, Yasin Yasa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11282-024-00786-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Introduction Fractal analysis (FA) is a computational method used to quantify the complex trabecular structure of bone. While FA has been widely applied in dentistry, there are challenges in standardizing the technique due to factors such as image resolution, region of interest (ROI) selection, and image processing. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the direction of ROI selection (DROIS) on fractal dimension (FD) calculations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Panoramic radiographs of 226 individuals aged 20-35 years were analyzed. ROIs were selected on the mandibular condyle, angular region, and mental region, and oriented at 0°, 22.5°, 45°, and 67.5° angles. FD was calculated using the box-counting method in ImageJ. The Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FD values differed significantly between the angled ROI groups in all three regions (Friedman test, p < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences in FD between most ROI orientations, except between 22.5° and 67.5° in the angular region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DROIS is an important factor that should be considered in FA studies to ensure reliable and reproducible FD values. Appropriate methodological choices can help account for the influence of DROIS on FD calculations..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-024-00786-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-024-00786-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:引言 分形分析(FA)是一种用于量化复杂骨小梁结构的计算方法。虽然分形分析已被广泛应用于牙科领域,但由于图像分辨率、感兴趣区(ROI)选择和图像处理等因素,该技术的标准化仍面临挑战。本研究旨在探讨感兴趣区选择方向(DROIS)对分形维度(FD)计算的影响:分析了 226 名年龄在 20-35 岁之间的人的全景 X 光片。在下颌骨髁状突、内眦区和精神区选择 ROI,并将其定向为 0°、22.5°、45° 和 67.5°。使用 ImageJ 中的盒计数法计算 FD。统计分析采用 Friedman 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验:在所有三个区域中,成角 ROI 组之间的 FD 值差异显著(Friedman 检验,P < 0.0001)。配对比较显示,除了角度区域的22.5°和67.5°之间,大多数ROI方向之间的FD都存在显著差异:结论:DROIS是FA研究中应考虑的一个重要因素,以确保FD值的可靠性和可重复性。适当的方法选择有助于解释DROIS对FD计算的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How does the direction of region of interest selection affect the fractal dimension?

Objectives: Introduction Fractal analysis (FA) is a computational method used to quantify the complex trabecular structure of bone. While FA has been widely applied in dentistry, there are challenges in standardizing the technique due to factors such as image resolution, region of interest (ROI) selection, and image processing. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the direction of ROI selection (DROIS) on fractal dimension (FD) calculations.

Methods: Panoramic radiographs of 226 individuals aged 20-35 years were analyzed. ROIs were selected on the mandibular condyle, angular region, and mental region, and oriented at 0°, 22.5°, 45°, and 67.5° angles. FD was calculated using the box-counting method in ImageJ. The Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The FD values differed significantly between the angled ROI groups in all three regions (Friedman test, p < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences in FD between most ROI orientations, except between 22.5° and 67.5° in the angular region.

Conclusions: DROIS is an important factor that should be considered in FA studies to ensure reliable and reproducible FD values. Appropriate methodological choices can help account for the influence of DROIS on FD calculations..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Radiology
Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparing the accuracy of two machine learning models in detection and classification of periapical lesions using periapical radiographs. How does the direction of region of interest selection affect the fractal dimension? Radiological assessment of Sella Turcica morphology correlates with skeletal classes in an Austrian population: an observational study. Fractal dimension, lacunarity, and bone area fraction analysis of peri-implant trabecular bone after prosthodontic loading. Automatic segmentation and visualization of cortical and marrow bone in mandibular condyle on CBCT: a preliminary exploration of clinical application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1