在为新生儿置入外周插入式中央导管时,产妇的声音对疼痛的影响。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2024.1483317
Audrey Flours, Fabienne Mons, Antoine Bedu, Thomas Lauvray, Anne-Laure Blanquart, Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Audrey Mowendabeka, Vincent Guigonis, Laure Ponthier
{"title":"在为新生儿置入外周插入式中央导管时,产妇的声音对疼痛的影响。","authors":"Audrey Flours, Fabienne Mons, Antoine Bedu, Thomas Lauvray, Anne-Laure Blanquart, Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Audrey Mowendabeka, Vincent Guigonis, Laure Ponthier","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1483317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) are a necessary procedure for preterm newborns care. Despite the use of analgesic treatments, its insertion can be painful. Our objective was to study the effect of maternal voice on pain during PICC insertion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a pre post study for 2 years. Pain was compared between the two groups (with/without maternal presence) using a neonatal pain scale (FANS). Infection rate, procedure time, number of failures, mothers' anxiety and caregivers'anxiety were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety neonates were eligible. Finally, 63 neonates were included. Thirty-four placements were realized without maternal voice (first period) and 29 with maternal voice (second period). Mean FANS during PICC placement was lower in the maternal voice group than in the control group (1.15 ± 1.27 vs. 1.41 ± 1.49, <i>p</i> = 0.033). The FANS was also lower in the maternal voice group during the time of the first cutaneous effraction (<i>p</i> = 0.032). There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maternal voice added to conventional care decreased acute pain during PICC insertion without increasing infection rate, number of failures or procedure time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"5 ","pages":"1483317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of maternal voice on pain during placement of peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates.\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Flours, Fabienne Mons, Antoine Bedu, Thomas Lauvray, Anne-Laure Blanquart, Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Audrey Mowendabeka, Vincent Guigonis, Laure Ponthier\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpain.2024.1483317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) are a necessary procedure for preterm newborns care. Despite the use of analgesic treatments, its insertion can be painful. Our objective was to study the effect of maternal voice on pain during PICC insertion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a pre post study for 2 years. Pain was compared between the two groups (with/without maternal presence) using a neonatal pain scale (FANS). Infection rate, procedure time, number of failures, mothers' anxiety and caregivers'anxiety were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety neonates were eligible. Finally, 63 neonates were included. Thirty-four placements were realized without maternal voice (first period) and 29 with maternal voice (second period). Mean FANS during PICC placement was lower in the maternal voice group than in the control group (1.15 ± 1.27 vs. 1.41 ± 1.49, <i>p</i> = 0.033). The FANS was also lower in the maternal voice group during the time of the first cutaneous effraction (<i>p</i> = 0.032). There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maternal voice added to conventional care decreased acute pain during PICC insertion without increasing infection rate, number of failures or procedure time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1483317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554615/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1483317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1483317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外周置入中心导管(PICC)是早产新生儿护理的必要程序。尽管使用了镇痛治疗,但插入时仍会感到疼痛。我们的目的是研究产妇的声音对插入 PICC 时疼痛的影响:方法:我们进行了一项为期两年的术前术后研究。使用新生儿疼痛量表(FANS)对两组(有/无产妇在场)的疼痛情况进行比较。比较两组的感染率、手术时间、失败次数、母亲焦虑和护理人员焦虑:结果:90 名新生儿符合条件。结果:90 名新生儿符合条件,最终 63 名新生儿被纳入其中。其中 34 例在无产妇声音的情况下(第一阶段)进行了置管,29 例在有产妇声音的情况下(第二阶段)进行了置管。产妇发声组在 PICC 置管时的平均 FANS 低于对照组(1.15 ± 1.27 vs. 1.41 ± 1.49,p = 0.033)。产妇嗓音组的 FANS 值在第一次皮肤剥脱时也较低(p = 0.032)。两组在其他结果上没有明显差异:结论:在常规护理的基础上添加母性声音可减少 PICC 插入过程中的急性疼痛,但不会增加感染率、失败次数或手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of maternal voice on pain during placement of peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates.

Background: Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) are a necessary procedure for preterm newborns care. Despite the use of analgesic treatments, its insertion can be painful. Our objective was to study the effect of maternal voice on pain during PICC insertion.

Method: We conducted a pre post study for 2 years. Pain was compared between the two groups (with/without maternal presence) using a neonatal pain scale (FANS). Infection rate, procedure time, number of failures, mothers' anxiety and caregivers'anxiety were compared between the two groups.

Results: Ninety neonates were eligible. Finally, 63 neonates were included. Thirty-four placements were realized without maternal voice (first period) and 29 with maternal voice (second period). Mean FANS during PICC placement was lower in the maternal voice group than in the control group (1.15 ± 1.27 vs. 1.41 ± 1.49, p = 0.033). The FANS was also lower in the maternal voice group during the time of the first cutaneous effraction (p = 0.032). There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the other outcomes.

Conclusion: Maternal voice added to conventional care decreased acute pain during PICC insertion without increasing infection rate, number of failures or procedure time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effects of maternal voice on pain during placement of peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates. Vascular and nerve biomarkers in thigh skin biopsies differentiate painful from painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Investigating conditioned pain modulation in horses: can the lip-twitch be used as a conditioning stimulus? Rescue analgesia with a transversus abdominis plane block alleviates moderate-to-severe pain and improves oxygenation after abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Evaluating pain in non-verbal critical care patients: a narrative review of the critical care pain observation tool and Its clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1