经颅多普勒是检测隐源性卒中患者右向左分流的主要筛查工具吗?

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Brain and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1002/brb3.70144
Payam Sasannejad, Fateme Khosravani, Alireza Ziaei Moghaddam, Mohsen Soltani Sabi, Lida Jarahi
{"title":"经颅多普勒是检测隐源性卒中患者右向左分流的主要筛查工具吗?","authors":"Payam Sasannejad, Fateme Khosravani, Alireza Ziaei Moghaddam, Mohsen Soltani Sabi, Lida Jarahi","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryptogenic stroke (CS), a subtype of ischemic stroke with undetermined etiology, accounts for approximately 25% of the cases. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an important potential cause of CS via paradoxical embolism. While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the current gold standard for PFO detection, transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound offers a noninvasive alternative with potential advantages in sensitivity for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection. This study's main goal is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TCD compared to TEE for PFO detection in CS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 110 patients aged 18-65 years with confirmed CS from 2020 to 2024. All underwent TCD screening for RLS using a standardized protocol. Subsequently, they were categorized based on a simplified version of the Spencer Logarithmic Scale, followed by confirmatory TEE. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, TCD results, and indications for PFO closure were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 45 years, with 58.2% being males. TEE identified PFO in 44.5% (49/110) of subjects. TCD accurately detected RLS in 42 of the 49 PFO cases (85.7%) confirmed by TEE. For PFO detection, TCD demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.4%, specificity of 88.5%, PPV of 85.4%, and Youden's index of 0.73. Notably, of the seven PFO cases missed by TCD, none received percutaneous closure based on clinical criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCD exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for detecting high-risk PFO in patients with CS when compared to the gold-standard TEE. As a noninvasive modality, TCD may serve as an effective screening tool to identify CS patients who could potentially benefit from confirmatory TEE and subsequent PFO closure intervention. The findings support the use of TCD as a screening tool to triage CS patients for confirmatory TEE and potential PFO closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"14 11","pages":"e70144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70144","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcranial Doppler as a Primary Screening Tool for Detecting Right-to-Left Shunt in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients?\",\"authors\":\"Payam Sasannejad, Fateme Khosravani, Alireza Ziaei Moghaddam, Mohsen Soltani Sabi, Lida Jarahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryptogenic stroke (CS), a subtype of ischemic stroke with undetermined etiology, accounts for approximately 25% of the cases. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an important potential cause of CS via paradoxical embolism. While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the current gold standard for PFO detection, transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound offers a noninvasive alternative with potential advantages in sensitivity for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection. This study's main goal is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TCD compared to TEE for PFO detection in CS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 110 patients aged 18-65 years with confirmed CS from 2020 to 2024. All underwent TCD screening for RLS using a standardized protocol. Subsequently, they were categorized based on a simplified version of the Spencer Logarithmic Scale, followed by confirmatory TEE. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, TCD results, and indications for PFO closure were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 45 years, with 58.2% being males. TEE identified PFO in 44.5% (49/110) of subjects. TCD accurately detected RLS in 42 of the 49 PFO cases (85.7%) confirmed by TEE. For PFO detection, TCD demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.4%, specificity of 88.5%, PPV of 85.4%, and Youden's index of 0.73. Notably, of the seven PFO cases missed by TCD, none received percutaneous closure based on clinical criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCD exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for detecting high-risk PFO in patients with CS when compared to the gold-standard TEE. As a noninvasive modality, TCD may serve as an effective screening tool to identify CS patients who could potentially benefit from confirmatory TEE and subsequent PFO closure intervention. The findings support the use of TCD as a screening tool to triage CS patients for confirmatory TEE and potential PFO closure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"14 11\",\"pages\":\"e70144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70144\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70144\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:隐源性卒中(CS)是病因未明的缺血性卒中的一种亚型,约占 25%。卵圆孔未闭(PFO)是通过矛盾性栓塞导致隐源性卒中的一个重要潜在原因。虽然经食道超声心动图(TEE)是目前检测 PFO 的黄金标准,但经颅多普勒(TCD)超声为检测右向左分流(RLS)提供了一种无创的替代方法,在灵敏度方面具有潜在的优势。本研究的主要目的是评估 TCD 与 TEE 相比在 CS 患者 PFO 检测中的诊断性能:我们在 2020 年至 2024 年期间前瞻性地招募了 110 名年龄在 18-65 岁之间、确诊为 CS 的患者。所有患者均采用标准化方案接受了 TCD 筛查以检测 RLS。随后,根据简化版斯宾塞对数量表对他们进行分类,再进行确诊 TEE。对临床特征、成像结果、TCD 结果和 PFO 关闭指征进行了分析:组群的平均年龄为 45 岁,58.2% 为男性。44.5%的受试者(49/110)通过 TEE 发现了 PFO。经 TEE 证实的 49 例 PFO 中,42 例(85.7%)的 TCD 准确检测出 RLS。TCD 检测 PFO 的灵敏度为 85.4%,特异性为 88.5%,PPV 为 85.4%,尤登指数为 0.73。值得注意的是,在 TCD 漏诊的 7 例 PFO 中,没有一例根据临床标准接受经皮闭合治疗:结论:与黄金标准的 TEE 相比,TCD 在检测 CS 患者的高危 PFO 方面具有很高的诊断准确性。作为一种无创方式,TCD 可作为一种有效的筛查工具,用于识别可能受益于确诊 TEE 和后续 PFO 关闭干预的 CS 患者。研究结果支持使用 TCD 作为筛查工具,对 CS 患者进行分流,以便进行确诊 TEE 和潜在的 PFO 关闭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transcranial Doppler as a Primary Screening Tool for Detecting Right-to-Left Shunt in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients?

Background: Cryptogenic stroke (CS), a subtype of ischemic stroke with undetermined etiology, accounts for approximately 25% of the cases. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an important potential cause of CS via paradoxical embolism. While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the current gold standard for PFO detection, transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound offers a noninvasive alternative with potential advantages in sensitivity for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection. This study's main goal is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TCD compared to TEE for PFO detection in CS patients.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 110 patients aged 18-65 years with confirmed CS from 2020 to 2024. All underwent TCD screening for RLS using a standardized protocol. Subsequently, they were categorized based on a simplified version of the Spencer Logarithmic Scale, followed by confirmatory TEE. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, TCD results, and indications for PFO closure were analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 45 years, with 58.2% being males. TEE identified PFO in 44.5% (49/110) of subjects. TCD accurately detected RLS in 42 of the 49 PFO cases (85.7%) confirmed by TEE. For PFO detection, TCD demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.4%, specificity of 88.5%, PPV of 85.4%, and Youden's index of 0.73. Notably, of the seven PFO cases missed by TCD, none received percutaneous closure based on clinical criteria.

Conclusions: TCD exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for detecting high-risk PFO in patients with CS when compared to the gold-standard TEE. As a noninvasive modality, TCD may serve as an effective screening tool to identify CS patients who could potentially benefit from confirmatory TEE and subsequent PFO closure intervention. The findings support the use of TCD as a screening tool to triage CS patients for confirmatory TEE and potential PFO closure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
期刊最新文献
Acceptability and Feasibility of Using Hair Samples for Chronic Stress Measurement Among Transgender Women in Brazil Accelerating Brain MR Imaging With Multisequence and Convolutional Neural Networks Behavioral Analyses in Dark Agouti Rats Following Repeated Systemic Treatment With Fingolimod (FTY720) Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Future Stroke: Evidence From CHARLS and Mendelian Randomization Analyses Evaluation of Carotid Stenosis in a High-Stroke-Risk Population by Hemodynamic Dual-Parameters Based on Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1