有营养不良风险的老年内科病人急性期后口服营养补充剂的健康经济价值:基于美国的建模方法。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086787
Shanshan Wang, Jason Shafrin, Kirk W Kerr, Philipp Schuetz
{"title":"有营养不良风险的老年内科病人急性期后口服营养补充剂的健康经济价值:基于美国的建模方法。","authors":"Shanshan Wang, Jason Shafrin, Kirk W Kerr, Philipp Schuetz","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the health economic value of postdischarge oral nutrition supplement (ONS) consumption among elderly adults who were malnourished during hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cost-effectiveness model was developed from a US payer perspective based on a recent meta-analysis of randomised trials of nutritional support following hospital discharge and studies of US hospital mortality, readmission rates and costs.</p><p><strong>Participants and setting: </strong>The target population of this study was postacute care US patients aged ≥65 years who were identified as malnourished during hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Intervention and outcome measures: </strong>A decision-tree model was used to evaluate the impact of postacute care daily consumption of ONS compared with no ONS. Outcomes were evaluated over a 1-year time interval. Clinical outcomes of interest included readmission and mortality rates. Economic value of ONS was quantified using three different metrics: cost per death averted, cost per readmission avoided and direct cost savings resulting from changes in postacute mortality and readmission rates. The economic value of ONS was also measured by gains in quality-adjusted life-years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with patients not receiving ONS after hospital discharge, use of ONS during the postacute phase reduced mortality by 36.3% and readmissions by 11.0%. Reductions in readmissions resulted in annual savings of US$1113 per person. When extrapolating the results to the estimated 1 693 034 hospitalised elderly US adults at risk of malnutrition, the use of ONS after hospital discharge would prevent 67 747 deaths and 116 570 hospital readmissions per year. With the estimated cost of nutritional support at US$175 per patient per month corresponding to two servings ONS per day, the ONS cost per death and readmission avoided was estimated at US$4380 and US$2546, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postdischarge use of ONS among patients at risk for malnutrition is highly cost-effective with important reductions in mortality and readmission rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health economic value of postacute oral nutritional supplementation in older adult medical patients at risk for malnutrition: a US-based modelling approach.\",\"authors\":\"Shanshan Wang, Jason Shafrin, Kirk W Kerr, Philipp Schuetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the health economic value of postdischarge oral nutrition supplement (ONS) consumption among elderly adults who were malnourished during hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cost-effectiveness model was developed from a US payer perspective based on a recent meta-analysis of randomised trials of nutritional support following hospital discharge and studies of US hospital mortality, readmission rates and costs.</p><p><strong>Participants and setting: </strong>The target population of this study was postacute care US patients aged ≥65 years who were identified as malnourished during hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Intervention and outcome measures: </strong>A decision-tree model was used to evaluate the impact of postacute care daily consumption of ONS compared with no ONS. Outcomes were evaluated over a 1-year time interval. Clinical outcomes of interest included readmission and mortality rates. Economic value of ONS was quantified using three different metrics: cost per death averted, cost per readmission avoided and direct cost savings resulting from changes in postacute mortality and readmission rates. The economic value of ONS was also measured by gains in quality-adjusted life-years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with patients not receiving ONS after hospital discharge, use of ONS during the postacute phase reduced mortality by 36.3% and readmissions by 11.0%. Reductions in readmissions resulted in annual savings of US$1113 per person. When extrapolating the results to the estimated 1 693 034 hospitalised elderly US adults at risk of malnutrition, the use of ONS after hospital discharge would prevent 67 747 deaths and 116 570 hospital readmissions per year. With the estimated cost of nutritional support at US$175 per patient per month corresponding to two servings ONS per day, the ONS cost per death and readmission avoided was estimated at US$4380 and US$2546, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postdischarge use of ONS among patients at risk for malnutrition is highly cost-effective with important reductions in mortality and readmission rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086787\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health economic value of postacute oral nutritional supplementation in older adult medical patients at risk for malnutrition: a US-based modelling approach.

Objective: To estimate the health economic value of postdischarge oral nutrition supplement (ONS) consumption among elderly adults who were malnourished during hospitalisation.

Design: A cost-effectiveness model was developed from a US payer perspective based on a recent meta-analysis of randomised trials of nutritional support following hospital discharge and studies of US hospital mortality, readmission rates and costs.

Participants and setting: The target population of this study was postacute care US patients aged ≥65 years who were identified as malnourished during hospitalisation.

Intervention and outcome measures: A decision-tree model was used to evaluate the impact of postacute care daily consumption of ONS compared with no ONS. Outcomes were evaluated over a 1-year time interval. Clinical outcomes of interest included readmission and mortality rates. Economic value of ONS was quantified using three different metrics: cost per death averted, cost per readmission avoided and direct cost savings resulting from changes in postacute mortality and readmission rates. The economic value of ONS was also measured by gains in quality-adjusted life-years.

Results: Compared with patients not receiving ONS after hospital discharge, use of ONS during the postacute phase reduced mortality by 36.3% and readmissions by 11.0%. Reductions in readmissions resulted in annual savings of US$1113 per person. When extrapolating the results to the estimated 1 693 034 hospitalised elderly US adults at risk of malnutrition, the use of ONS after hospital discharge would prevent 67 747 deaths and 116 570 hospital readmissions per year. With the estimated cost of nutritional support at US$175 per patient per month corresponding to two servings ONS per day, the ONS cost per death and readmission avoided was estimated at US$4380 and US$2546, respectively.

Conclusions: Postdischarge use of ONS among patients at risk for malnutrition is highly cost-effective with important reductions in mortality and readmission rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis. Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study. Association between life satisfaction and health behaviours among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Determinants of inpatient satisfaction and hospital recommendation: experiences from a cross-sectional study of a tertiary general hospital in China. Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1