倾向评分匹配分析评估辅助治疗对食管鳞状细胞癌 R0 切除术后疾病复发的益处。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-806
Yuqin Cao, Qingqing Hu, Yajie Zhang, Chengqiang Li, Yuan Zhou, Yongjing Zhang, Hong Qiu, Hecheng Li
{"title":"倾向评分匹配分析评估辅助治疗对食管鳞状细胞癌 R0 切除术后疾病复发的益处。","authors":"Yuqin Cao, Qingqing Hu, Yajie Zhang, Chengqiang Li, Yuan Zhou, Yongjing Zhang, Hong Qiu, Hecheng Li","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is common in China and has a poor prognosis despite radical surgery. Guidelines around the use of adjuvant therapy (AT) in ESCC are indecisive. We assessed the benefit of AT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in Chinese patients with ESCC using propensity score (PS) matching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used hospital electronic medical records (EMRs) of 523 adults diagnosed between 2013 to 2019 with pathologically confirmed ESCC after R0 esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. PSs were calculated using a generalized linear regression model based on demographic, clinical, and pathologic features. Patients with and without AT were matched using nearest neighbor method and caliper value 0.05. Subgroup analyses were stratified by PS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Younger patients with more advanced/poorly differentiated disease were more likely to receive AT (P<0.05). There were 137 matched pairs in the AT/No AT groups. After matching, the AT group tended to have longer median RFS [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.21 years (1.54-3.20)] than the No AT group [1.75 years (1.37-2.21)] (P=0.18). The benefit was significant in patients with PS ≥0.40 [hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.87, median RFS (95% CI): 2.22 years (1.30-3.52) versus 1.23 years (0.90-1.64), P=0.03]. In other PS subgroups, median RFS was similar in AT and No AT groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjusting for baseline characteristics, AT tended to improve RFS after R0 esophagectomy in Chinese patients, with significant benefit associated with a higher PS score. The utility of PS to guide patient selection for AT in clinical practice needs further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 10","pages":"6651-6663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A propensity score-matched analysis to evaluate the benefit of adjuvant therapy on disease recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Yuqin Cao, Qingqing Hu, Yajie Zhang, Chengqiang Li, Yuan Zhou, Yongjing Zhang, Hong Qiu, Hecheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is common in China and has a poor prognosis despite radical surgery. Guidelines around the use of adjuvant therapy (AT) in ESCC are indecisive. We assessed the benefit of AT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in Chinese patients with ESCC using propensity score (PS) matching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used hospital electronic medical records (EMRs) of 523 adults diagnosed between 2013 to 2019 with pathologically confirmed ESCC after R0 esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. PSs were calculated using a generalized linear regression model based on demographic, clinical, and pathologic features. Patients with and without AT were matched using nearest neighbor method and caliper value 0.05. Subgroup analyses were stratified by PS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Younger patients with more advanced/poorly differentiated disease were more likely to receive AT (P<0.05). There were 137 matched pairs in the AT/No AT groups. After matching, the AT group tended to have longer median RFS [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.21 years (1.54-3.20)] than the No AT group [1.75 years (1.37-2.21)] (P=0.18). The benefit was significant in patients with PS ≥0.40 [hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.87, median RFS (95% CI): 2.22 years (1.30-3.52) versus 1.23 years (0.90-1.64), P=0.03]. In other PS subgroups, median RFS was similar in AT and No AT groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjusting for baseline characteristics, AT tended to improve RFS after R0 esophagectomy in Chinese patients, with significant benefit associated with a higher PS score. The utility of PS to guide patient selection for AT in clinical practice needs further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"6651-6663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565312/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-806\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)在中国很常见,尽管进行了根治性手术,但预后较差。ESCC的辅助治疗(AT)指南尚不明确。我们采用倾向评分(PS)匹配法评估了辅助治疗对中国ESCC患者无复发生存期(RFS)的益处:这项回顾性队列研究使用了医院的电子病历(EMR),研究对象是在2013年至2019年期间确诊为病理确诊ESCC的523名成人患者,这些患者均接受了R0食管切除术,但未接受新辅助治疗。根据人口学、临床和病理学特征,采用广义线性回归模型计算PSs。采用最近邻法和卡方值 0.05 对有 AT 和无 AT 的患者进行配对。根据PS进行分组分析:结果:年龄较轻、疾病较晚期/分化较差的患者更有可能接受AT治疗(PC结论:调整基线特征后,AT往往能改善中国患者R0食管切除术后的RFS,PS评分越高,获益越明显。在临床实践中,PS在指导患者选择AT方面的效用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A propensity score-matched analysis to evaluate the benefit of adjuvant therapy on disease recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy.

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is common in China and has a poor prognosis despite radical surgery. Guidelines around the use of adjuvant therapy (AT) in ESCC are indecisive. We assessed the benefit of AT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in Chinese patients with ESCC using propensity score (PS) matching.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used hospital electronic medical records (EMRs) of 523 adults diagnosed between 2013 to 2019 with pathologically confirmed ESCC after R0 esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. PSs were calculated using a generalized linear regression model based on demographic, clinical, and pathologic features. Patients with and without AT were matched using nearest neighbor method and caliper value 0.05. Subgroup analyses were stratified by PS.

Results: Younger patients with more advanced/poorly differentiated disease were more likely to receive AT (P<0.05). There were 137 matched pairs in the AT/No AT groups. After matching, the AT group tended to have longer median RFS [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.21 years (1.54-3.20)] than the No AT group [1.75 years (1.37-2.21)] (P=0.18). The benefit was significant in patients with PS ≥0.40 [hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.87, median RFS (95% CI): 2.22 years (1.30-3.52) versus 1.23 years (0.90-1.64), P=0.03]. In other PS subgroups, median RFS was similar in AT and No AT groups.

Conclusions: After adjusting for baseline characteristics, AT tended to improve RFS after R0 esophagectomy in Chinese patients, with significant benefit associated with a higher PS score. The utility of PS to guide patient selection for AT in clinical practice needs further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
期刊最新文献
How can osteosynthesis material used for fracture fixation undergo intrathoracic migration?-a systematic literature review. Identification of prognostic factors of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a retrospective cohort of 106 patients. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute medium- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study. Impact of high spinal anesthesia in pediatric congenital heart surgery on postoperative recovery: a retrospective propensity score-matched study. Impact of lymph node evaluation standard in patients undergoing lung resection for clinical stage IA pulmonary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1