在落叶林林下重新种植酢浆草可抑制外来入侵的 Rhamnus cathartica

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107438
Michael J. Schuster , Peter D. Wragg , Alex M. Roth , Paul Bockenstedt , Lee Frelich , Peter B. Reich
{"title":"在落叶林林下重新种植酢浆草可抑制外来入侵的 Rhamnus cathartica","authors":"Michael J. Schuster ,&nbsp;Peter D. Wragg ,&nbsp;Alex M. Roth ,&nbsp;Paul Bockenstedt ,&nbsp;Lee Frelich ,&nbsp;Peter B. Reich","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Common buckthorn (<em>Rhamnus cathartica</em>) is one of the most widespread invaders of temperate forest and woodland understories in North America. Eradication of buckthorn is a common management goal, but one that is rarely realized since buckthorn quickly re-establishes in managed communities with low biotic resistance. In the years following management, pre-existing native propagules that could potentially re-establish and resist buckthorn re-establishment are scarce whereas buckthorn propagule pressure remains high. Thus, invaded understories often return to or remain in a buckthorn-dominated state when efforts focus only on treating buckthorn over a short period of time. Here, we test the hypothesis that post-management seeding of native graminoids and forbs increases competition and reduces buckthorn re-establishment. We compared pairs of seeded and unseeded plots (<em>n</em> = 35) across 7 sites undergoing buckthorn management near St. Paul, Minnesota, USA from 2017 to 2022. Over that time, we monitored herbaceous cover and light availability as well as the germination, growth, and survival of four cohorts of buckthorn seeds planted into each plot. We found that seeding increased cover of native herbaceous species (especially <em>Elymus</em> grasses and other graminoids) in areas with &gt;7 % tree canopy openness, which in turn reduced light availability to germinating buckthorn by one third. These changes in herbaceous cover and light availability reduced buckthorn growth and survival in complex ways. Effects of seeding on buckthorn were strongest immediately following initial management and in areas with greater tree canopy openness. By the end of the experiment, buckthorn germinating one- and two-years after initial management were 47 % less abundant and 81 % smaller in seeded areas compared to unseeded ones with more than 10 % tree canopy openness. Our findings indicate that post-management seeding of <em>Elymus</em> grasses and other graminoids can partially suppress buckthorn re-establishment in semi-open forests and woodlands following initial management (a critical period wherein buckthorn propagule pressure is high and ambient biotic resistance is low). By augmenting biotic resistance through post-management seeding, managers can effectively limit future invasion and reduce demands for additional management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revegetation of Elymus grasses suppresses invasive Rhamnus cathartica in deciduous forest understories\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Schuster ,&nbsp;Peter D. Wragg ,&nbsp;Alex M. Roth ,&nbsp;Paul Bockenstedt ,&nbsp;Lee Frelich ,&nbsp;Peter B. Reich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Common buckthorn (<em>Rhamnus cathartica</em>) is one of the most widespread invaders of temperate forest and woodland understories in North America. Eradication of buckthorn is a common management goal, but one that is rarely realized since buckthorn quickly re-establishes in managed communities with low biotic resistance. In the years following management, pre-existing native propagules that could potentially re-establish and resist buckthorn re-establishment are scarce whereas buckthorn propagule pressure remains high. Thus, invaded understories often return to or remain in a buckthorn-dominated state when efforts focus only on treating buckthorn over a short period of time. Here, we test the hypothesis that post-management seeding of native graminoids and forbs increases competition and reduces buckthorn re-establishment. We compared pairs of seeded and unseeded plots (<em>n</em> = 35) across 7 sites undergoing buckthorn management near St. Paul, Minnesota, USA from 2017 to 2022. Over that time, we monitored herbaceous cover and light availability as well as the germination, growth, and survival of four cohorts of buckthorn seeds planted into each plot. We found that seeding increased cover of native herbaceous species (especially <em>Elymus</em> grasses and other graminoids) in areas with &gt;7 % tree canopy openness, which in turn reduced light availability to germinating buckthorn by one third. These changes in herbaceous cover and light availability reduced buckthorn growth and survival in complex ways. Effects of seeding on buckthorn were strongest immediately following initial management and in areas with greater tree canopy openness. By the end of the experiment, buckthorn germinating one- and two-years after initial management were 47 % less abundant and 81 % smaller in seeded areas compared to unseeded ones with more than 10 % tree canopy openness. Our findings indicate that post-management seeding of <em>Elymus</em> grasses and other graminoids can partially suppress buckthorn re-establishment in semi-open forests and woodlands following initial management (a critical period wherein buckthorn propagule pressure is high and ambient biotic resistance is low). By augmenting biotic resistance through post-management seeding, managers can effectively limit future invasion and reduce demands for additional management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普通沙棘(Rhamnus cathartica)是北美温带森林和林地林下最广泛的入侵者之一。根除沙棘是一种常见的管理目标,但很少能实现,因为沙棘很快就会在生物抗性较低的管理群落中重新建立。在管理后的几年里,有可能重新建立并抵抗沙棘重新建立的原有本地繁殖体很少,而沙棘的繁殖压力却居高不下。因此,如果只在短时间内集中治理沙棘,受入侵的林下植物往往会恢复或保持以沙棘为主的状态。在这里,我们验证了一个假设,即在治理后播种本地禾本科植物和草本植物会增加竞争并减少沙棘的重新建立。从 2017 年到 2022 年,我们在美国明尼苏达州圣保罗附近 7 个进行沙棘管理的地点比较了播种地块和未播种地块(n = 35)。在此期间,我们监测了草本植物的覆盖度和光照可用性,以及每块地里播种的四批沙棘种子的发芽、生长和存活情况。我们发现,在树冠开阔度为>7%的地区,播种增加了本地草本植物(尤其是酢浆草和其他禾本科植物)的覆盖率,这反过来又将沙棘发芽时的光照可用性降低了三分之一。草本植物覆盖和光照的这些变化以复杂的方式降低了沙棘的生长和存活率。播种对沙棘的影响在初始管理后和树冠开阔度较大的地区最为明显。实验结束时,与树冠开阔度超过 10% 的未播种地区相比,播种地区在初始管理后一年和两年发芽的沙棘数量减少了 47%,面积缩小了 81%。我们的研究结果表明,管理后播种稗草和其他禾本科植物可以部分抑制沙棘在初始管理后(沙棘繁殖压力大而环境生物抗性低的关键时期)的半疏林和林地中重新建立。通过管理后播种来增强生物抗性,管理者可以有效地限制未来的入侵,减少对额外管理的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revegetation of Elymus grasses suppresses invasive Rhamnus cathartica in deciduous forest understories
Common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) is one of the most widespread invaders of temperate forest and woodland understories in North America. Eradication of buckthorn is a common management goal, but one that is rarely realized since buckthorn quickly re-establishes in managed communities with low biotic resistance. In the years following management, pre-existing native propagules that could potentially re-establish and resist buckthorn re-establishment are scarce whereas buckthorn propagule pressure remains high. Thus, invaded understories often return to or remain in a buckthorn-dominated state when efforts focus only on treating buckthorn over a short period of time. Here, we test the hypothesis that post-management seeding of native graminoids and forbs increases competition and reduces buckthorn re-establishment. We compared pairs of seeded and unseeded plots (n = 35) across 7 sites undergoing buckthorn management near St. Paul, Minnesota, USA from 2017 to 2022. Over that time, we monitored herbaceous cover and light availability as well as the germination, growth, and survival of four cohorts of buckthorn seeds planted into each plot. We found that seeding increased cover of native herbaceous species (especially Elymus grasses and other graminoids) in areas with >7 % tree canopy openness, which in turn reduced light availability to germinating buckthorn by one third. These changes in herbaceous cover and light availability reduced buckthorn growth and survival in complex ways. Effects of seeding on buckthorn were strongest immediately following initial management and in areas with greater tree canopy openness. By the end of the experiment, buckthorn germinating one- and two-years after initial management were 47 % less abundant and 81 % smaller in seeded areas compared to unseeded ones with more than 10 % tree canopy openness. Our findings indicate that post-management seeding of Elymus grasses and other graminoids can partially suppress buckthorn re-establishment in semi-open forests and woodlands following initial management (a critical period wherein buckthorn propagule pressure is high and ambient biotic resistance is low). By augmenting biotic resistance through post-management seeding, managers can effectively limit future invasion and reduce demands for additional management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Nature-based mitigation of shoreline erosion risks in tidal marshes created by managed realignment vs. sediment nourishment Facilitative interactions promote biodiversity in various ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem management and restoration Quantifying restored riparian buffer delineation accuracy and detectability in multitemporal imagery 29 years of carbon sequestration in two constructed riverine wetlands Bio-degradable ‘reef bags’ used for rubble stabilisation and their impact on rubble stability, binding, coral recruitment and fish occupancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1