"碳排放与不平等之间的相互作用:复杂网络方法"

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2024.100520
José Alejandro Fernández Fernández , Miguel Ángel Casquet Cano , Sonia Quiroga
{"title":"\"碳排放与不平等之间的相互作用:复杂网络方法\"","authors":"José Alejandro Fernández Fernández ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Casquet Cano ,&nbsp;Sonia Quiroga","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sustainable development process faces two key challenges: income inequality and carbon emissions, but their relationship remains unclear. This study analyzes interrelations between greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and income inequality across European countries, using the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) framework. First, the main determinants of greenhouse gas emissions are identified through Random Forest analysis, then two inequality groups are created via cluster analysis based on SDG1 and SDG10. Finally, two complex networks are constructed based on the inequality groups and main emission determinants to determine the most relevant factors influencing each group's impact on global emissions.</div><div>Our research reveals significant differences between countries with low and high levels of inequality. In the high-inequality group, productivity and emissions are negatively correlated, whereas, in the low-inequality group, the relationship is positive. This trade-off indicates that countries with lower inequality tend to have greater energy efficiency, but improvements in quality of life lead to higher consumption levels, influenced by the Marginal Propensity to Emit and consumer status levels. The negative relationship in the high-inequality group suggests a potential income threshold where productivity increases reduce emissions due to energy efficiency offsetting consumption increases. In agricultural activities, countries with higher inequality see a positive impact on emissions, whereas in countries with lower inequality, agriculture tends to be more productive with lower emissions. In countries with higher inequality, increased government investments correlate with higher emissions. Conversely, in countries with lower inequality, investments align with zero-carbon efforts, showing a negative correlation with emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100520"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The interplay between carbon emissions and inequality: A complex networks approach”\",\"authors\":\"José Alejandro Fernández Fernández ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Casquet Cano ,&nbsp;Sonia Quiroga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The sustainable development process faces two key challenges: income inequality and carbon emissions, but their relationship remains unclear. This study analyzes interrelations between greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and income inequality across European countries, using the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) framework. First, the main determinants of greenhouse gas emissions are identified through Random Forest analysis, then two inequality groups are created via cluster analysis based on SDG1 and SDG10. Finally, two complex networks are constructed based on the inequality groups and main emission determinants to determine the most relevant factors influencing each group's impact on global emissions.</div><div>Our research reveals significant differences between countries with low and high levels of inequality. In the high-inequality group, productivity and emissions are negatively correlated, whereas, in the low-inequality group, the relationship is positive. This trade-off indicates that countries with lower inequality tend to have greater energy efficiency, but improvements in quality of life lead to higher consumption levels, influenced by the Marginal Propensity to Emit and consumer status levels. The negative relationship in the high-inequality group suggests a potential income threshold where productivity increases reduce emissions due to energy efficiency offsetting consumption increases. In agricultural activities, countries with higher inequality see a positive impact on emissions, whereas in countries with lower inequality, agriculture tends to be more productive with lower emissions. In countries with higher inequality, increased government investments correlate with higher emissions. Conversely, in countries with lower inequality, investments align with zero-carbon efforts, showing a negative correlation with emissions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展进程面临两大挑战:收入不平等和碳排放,但它们之间的关系仍不明确。本研究利用可持续发展目标(SDG)框架,分析了欧洲各国温室气体排放(GHG)与收入不平等之间的相互关系。首先,通过随机森林分析确定温室气体排放的主要决定因素,然后根据 SDG1 和 SDG10 通过聚类分析创建两个不平等群体。最后,根据不平等组别和主要排放决定因素构建了两个复杂网络,以确定影响每个组别对全球排放影响的最相关因素。在高不平等组中,生产率和排放量呈负相关,而在低不平等组中,两者呈正相关。这种权衡表明,不平等程度较低的国家往往能效较高,但生活质量的改善会导致消费水平的提高,这受到边际排放倾向和消费者地位水平的影响。高不平等组中的负相关表明,在一个潜在的收入临界点上,由于能源效率抵消了消费的增长,生产率的提高减少了排放。在农业活动中,不平等程度较高的国家会对排放产生积极影响,而在不平等程度较低的国家,农业往往生产率更高,排放更低。在不平等程度较高的国家,政府投资的增加与排放量的增加相关。相反,在不平等程度较低的国家,投资与零碳努力相一致,与排放量呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“The interplay between carbon emissions and inequality: A complex networks approach”
The sustainable development process faces two key challenges: income inequality and carbon emissions, but their relationship remains unclear. This study analyzes interrelations between greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and income inequality across European countries, using the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) framework. First, the main determinants of greenhouse gas emissions are identified through Random Forest analysis, then two inequality groups are created via cluster analysis based on SDG1 and SDG10. Finally, two complex networks are constructed based on the inequality groups and main emission determinants to determine the most relevant factors influencing each group's impact on global emissions.
Our research reveals significant differences between countries with low and high levels of inequality. In the high-inequality group, productivity and emissions are negatively correlated, whereas, in the low-inequality group, the relationship is positive. This trade-off indicates that countries with lower inequality tend to have greater energy efficiency, but improvements in quality of life lead to higher consumption levels, influenced by the Marginal Propensity to Emit and consumer status levels. The negative relationship in the high-inequality group suggests a potential income threshold where productivity increases reduce emissions due to energy efficiency offsetting consumption increases. In agricultural activities, countries with higher inequality see a positive impact on emissions, whereas in countries with lower inequality, agriculture tends to be more productive with lower emissions. In countries with higher inequality, increased government investments correlate with higher emissions. Conversely, in countries with lower inequality, investments align with zero-carbon efforts, showing a negative correlation with emissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
An in-depth multiscale analysis of farmland abandonment and recultivation dynamics in the Yangtze River Delta, China: A landscape ecology perspective empowered by google earth engine Security vs efficiency of the water-energy-food nexus. A study of the economies of the regions of Spain Enhancing environmental sustainability: Optimal municipal-industrial waste burial site selection in Bandar Abbas, Iran using a fuzzy multi-criteria approach incorporating physical-geotechnical factor Policy effects of water rights trading (WRT) Vulnerability of small-scale farming livelihoods under climate variability in a globally important archipelago of the Global South
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1