Khushboo Gala, June Tome, Mary Krall, Devin Tian, John B League, Eric J Vargas, Darrell S Pardi, Amanda M Johnson, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂患者结肠镜检查前的肠道准备质量。","authors":"Khushboo Gala, June Tome, Mary Krall, Devin Tian, John B League, Eric J Vargas, Darrell S Pardi, Amanda M Johnson, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We aimed to assess the quality of bowel preparation in a matched cohort of patients actively using and not using GLP-1 RAs in a large health system in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing colonoscopy in 22 endoscopy units across 18 sites in the US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort comprised 6235 patients (3344 cases and 2891 controls). Baseline variables causing suboptimal bowel preparation were setting of procedure (inpatient), sex (male), BMI (higher), T2D, IBD, opioid medications, heart failure, and cirrhosis. Total BBPS was significantly higher in controls even after controlling for the abovementioned variables (p < 0.01). Cases were significantly more likely to meet the definition of inadequate bowel preparation. There was no significant difference between different classes of GLP-1 RAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients using GLP-1 RAs are more likely to have inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy, even accounting for other comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.\",\"authors\":\"Khushboo Gala, June Tome, Mary Krall, Devin Tian, John B League, Eric J Vargas, Darrell S Pardi, Amanda M Johnson, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We aimed to assess the quality of bowel preparation in a matched cohort of patients actively using and not using GLP-1 RAs in a large health system in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing colonoscopy in 22 endoscopy units across 18 sites in the US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort comprised 6235 patients (3344 cases and 2891 controls). Baseline variables causing suboptimal bowel preparation were setting of procedure (inpatient), sex (male), BMI (higher), T2D, IBD, opioid medications, heart failure, and cirrhosis. Total BBPS was significantly higher in controls even after controlling for the abovementioned variables (p < 0.01). Cases were significantly more likely to meet the definition of inadequate bowel preparation. There was no significant difference between different classes of GLP-1 RAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients using GLP-1 RAs are more likely to have inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy, even accounting for other comorbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.
Background and aims: We aimed to assess the quality of bowel preparation in a matched cohort of patients actively using and not using GLP-1 RAs in a large health system in the United States.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing colonoscopy in 22 endoscopy units across 18 sites in the US.
Results: Our cohort comprised 6235 patients (3344 cases and 2891 controls). Baseline variables causing suboptimal bowel preparation were setting of procedure (inpatient), sex (male), BMI (higher), T2D, IBD, opioid medications, heart failure, and cirrhosis. Total BBPS was significantly higher in controls even after controlling for the abovementioned variables (p < 0.01). Cases were significantly more likely to meet the definition of inadequate bowel preparation. There was no significant difference between different classes of GLP-1 RAs.
Conclusions: Patients using GLP-1 RAs are more likely to have inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy, even accounting for other comorbidities.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.