膀胱过度活动症治疗趋势:膀胱过度活动症治疗趋势:临床治疗路径、实践指南和治疗使用模式之间的关联。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Neurourology and Urodynamics Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1002/nau.25627
Hodan Mohamud, Shada Sinclair, Susanna Gunamany, Claire S Burton, Chiyuan A Zhang, Raveen Syan, Ekene A Enemchukwu
{"title":"膀胱过度活动症治疗趋势:膀胱过度活动症治疗趋势:临床治疗路径、实践指南和治疗使用模式之间的关联。","authors":"Hodan Mohamud, Shada Sinclair, Susanna Gunamany, Claire S Burton, Chiyuan A Zhang, Raveen Syan, Ekene A Enemchukwu","doi":"10.1002/nau.25627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic condition with significant financial and health-related consequences. Guidelines and treatment pathways were created to optimize care and provide a clinical framework for diagnosing and managing OAB. However, the impact of these efforts and patterns of medical treatment for OAB are poorly understood. Therefore, we sought to evaluate overall trends in therapy utilization before and after the 2014 American Urological Association (AUA)/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) OAB guideline amendment and publication of the OAB clinical care pathway in 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from Optum, a national administrative health and pharmacy claims database, between 2013 and 2018. All adult patients diagnosed with idiopathic OAB were identified by the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th Revision codes. Oral OAB therapies were identified using National Drug Codes, while third-line therapy procedures, onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The study's primary outcome was the annual number of OAB prescriptions filled by pharmacotherapy class and the number of minimally invasive therapies performed during the study period. The secondary outcome was the association between OAB therapy utilization and various clinical and sociodemographic factors. Patterns of care were analyzed from 2013 to 2018, and initial treatment with each therapy was collected, excluding repeat procedures from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1 825 782 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 61.1 ± 16.7 years, and 1 071 420 patients were female (58.7%). The number of new OAB diagnoses increased by 369% from 2013 to 2017. During the 6-year study period, 347 052 (19%) patients were treated with oral and/or third-line therapies. The overall number of oral medications prescribed peaked in 2016, followed by a 17% decline between 2016 and 2018. In 2013, the two most prescribed oral medications were oxybutynin (46%) and solifenacin (31.8%). By 2018, mirabegron (18.5%) surpassed solifenacin (16.5%), with oxybutynin still accounting for most prescriptions written (55%). Eighty percent of all initial mirabegron prescriptions were filled by patients over the age of 65. The rate of third-line therapy procedures almost doubled between 2013 and 2018 (9-17 procedures per 1000 OAB patients, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following the publication of the first OAB guidelines, there was an increase in OAB diagnoses, followed by a decrease in anticholinergic medication use, and a rise in beta-3 agonist utilization in patients over 65 years old. Additionally, there was greater adoption of third-line OAB therapies. These trends indicate that OAB therapy guidelines and clinical practice pathways may influence treatment patterns. Given the recent publication of the OAB guidelines, further studies are necessary to assess their impact on therapy utilization patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Overactive Bladder Therapy: Associations Between Clinical Care Pathways, Practice Guidelines, and Therapy Utilization Patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Hodan Mohamud, Shada Sinclair, Susanna Gunamany, Claire S Burton, Chiyuan A Zhang, Raveen Syan, Ekene A Enemchukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nau.25627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic condition with significant financial and health-related consequences. Guidelines and treatment pathways were created to optimize care and provide a clinical framework for diagnosing and managing OAB. However, the impact of these efforts and patterns of medical treatment for OAB are poorly understood. Therefore, we sought to evaluate overall trends in therapy utilization before and after the 2014 American Urological Association (AUA)/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) OAB guideline amendment and publication of the OAB clinical care pathway in 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from Optum, a national administrative health and pharmacy claims database, between 2013 and 2018. All adult patients diagnosed with idiopathic OAB were identified by the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th Revision codes. Oral OAB therapies were identified using National Drug Codes, while third-line therapy procedures, onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The study's primary outcome was the annual number of OAB prescriptions filled by pharmacotherapy class and the number of minimally invasive therapies performed during the study period. The secondary outcome was the association between OAB therapy utilization and various clinical and sociodemographic factors. Patterns of care were analyzed from 2013 to 2018, and initial treatment with each therapy was collected, excluding repeat procedures from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1 825 782 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 61.1 ± 16.7 years, and 1 071 420 patients were female (58.7%). The number of new OAB diagnoses increased by 369% from 2013 to 2017. During the 6-year study period, 347 052 (19%) patients were treated with oral and/or third-line therapies. The overall number of oral medications prescribed peaked in 2016, followed by a 17% decline between 2016 and 2018. In 2013, the two most prescribed oral medications were oxybutynin (46%) and solifenacin (31.8%). By 2018, mirabegron (18.5%) surpassed solifenacin (16.5%), with oxybutynin still accounting for most prescriptions written (55%). Eighty percent of all initial mirabegron prescriptions were filled by patients over the age of 65. The rate of third-line therapy procedures almost doubled between 2013 and 2018 (9-17 procedures per 1000 OAB patients, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following the publication of the first OAB guidelines, there was an increase in OAB diagnoses, followed by a decrease in anticholinergic medication use, and a rise in beta-3 agonist utilization in patients over 65 years old. Additionally, there was greater adoption of third-line OAB therapies. These trends indicate that OAB therapy guidelines and clinical practice pathways may influence treatment patterns. Given the recent publication of the OAB guidelines, further studies are necessary to assess their impact on therapy utilization patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurourology and Urodynamics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurourology and Urodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25627\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:膀胱过度活动症(OAB)是一种慢性疾病,会对经济和健康造成重大影响。制定指南和治疗路径的目的是优化护理,并为诊断和管理 OAB 提供临床框架。然而,人们对这些努力的影响以及 OAB 的医疗模式知之甚少。因此,我们试图评估2014年美国泌尿外科协会(AUA)/泌尿动力学、女性盆腔医学和泌尿生殖系统重建学会(SUFU)OAB指南修订和2016年OAB临床护理路径发布前后治疗利用的总体趋势:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了 2013 年至 2018 年期间来自 Optum 的数据,Optum 是一个全国性的行政健康和药房索赔数据库。所有确诊为特发性 OAB 的成年患者均通过国际疾病分类第 9 版和第 10 版代码进行识别。口服 OAB 疗法使用国家药品代码进行识别,而三线治疗程序,即阿糖胞苷(onabotulinumtoxinA,BTX)、骶神经调节(SNM)和经皮胫神经刺激(PTNS),则使用当前程序术语(CPT)代码进行识别。研究的主要结果是研究期间按药物疗法类别开具的年度 OAB 处方数量和进行的微创疗法数量。次要结果是 OAB 治疗利用率与各种临床和社会人口因素之间的关联。对2013年至2018年的护理模式进行了分析,并收集了每种疗法的初始治疗情况,将重复治疗排除在分析之外:研究共纳入1 825 782名患者。平均年龄为(61.1 ± 16.7)岁,1 071 420 名患者为女性(58.7%)。从 2013 年到 2017 年,新诊断出的 OAB 患者人数增加了 369%。在 6 年的研究期间,347 052 名患者(19%)接受了口服和/或三线疗法治疗。口服药物处方总量在2016年达到峰值,随后在2016年至2018年期间下降了17%。2013 年,处方最多的两种口服药物是奥昔布宁(46%)和索利非那新(31.8%)。到 2018 年,米拉贝琼(18.5%)超过了索利那新(16.5%),奥昔布宁仍占处方量的大多数(55%)。80%的米贝琼初始处方由 65 岁以上的患者开具。2013 年至 2018 年间,三线治疗程序率几乎翻了一番(每 1000 名 OAB 患者中有 9-17 个程序,P 结论:第一份 OAB 指南发布后,OAB 诊断增加,随后抗胆碱能药物使用减少,65 岁以上患者使用 beta-3 激动剂的比例上升。此外,采用三线 OAB 疗法的人数也有所增加。这些趋势表明,OAB 治疗指南和临床实践路径可能会影响治疗模式。鉴于最近公布了 OAB 指南,有必要开展进一步研究,以评估其对治疗利用模式的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in Overactive Bladder Therapy: Associations Between Clinical Care Pathways, Practice Guidelines, and Therapy Utilization Patterns.

Introduction: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic condition with significant financial and health-related consequences. Guidelines and treatment pathways were created to optimize care and provide a clinical framework for diagnosing and managing OAB. However, the impact of these efforts and patterns of medical treatment for OAB are poorly understood. Therefore, we sought to evaluate overall trends in therapy utilization before and after the 2014 American Urological Association (AUA)/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) OAB guideline amendment and publication of the OAB clinical care pathway in 2016.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from Optum, a national administrative health and pharmacy claims database, between 2013 and 2018. All adult patients diagnosed with idiopathic OAB were identified by the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th Revision codes. Oral OAB therapies were identified using National Drug Codes, while third-line therapy procedures, onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The study's primary outcome was the annual number of OAB prescriptions filled by pharmacotherapy class and the number of minimally invasive therapies performed during the study period. The secondary outcome was the association between OAB therapy utilization and various clinical and sociodemographic factors. Patterns of care were analyzed from 2013 to 2018, and initial treatment with each therapy was collected, excluding repeat procedures from the analysis.

Results: 1 825 782 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 61.1 ± 16.7 years, and 1 071 420 patients were female (58.7%). The number of new OAB diagnoses increased by 369% from 2013 to 2017. During the 6-year study period, 347 052 (19%) patients were treated with oral and/or third-line therapies. The overall number of oral medications prescribed peaked in 2016, followed by a 17% decline between 2016 and 2018. In 2013, the two most prescribed oral medications were oxybutynin (46%) and solifenacin (31.8%). By 2018, mirabegron (18.5%) surpassed solifenacin (16.5%), with oxybutynin still accounting for most prescriptions written (55%). Eighty percent of all initial mirabegron prescriptions were filled by patients over the age of 65. The rate of third-line therapy procedures almost doubled between 2013 and 2018 (9-17 procedures per 1000 OAB patients, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Following the publication of the first OAB guidelines, there was an increase in OAB diagnoses, followed by a decrease in anticholinergic medication use, and a rise in beta-3 agonist utilization in patients over 65 years old. Additionally, there was greater adoption of third-line OAB therapies. These trends indicate that OAB therapy guidelines and clinical practice pathways may influence treatment patterns. Given the recent publication of the OAB guidelines, further studies are necessary to assess their impact on therapy utilization patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Short-Term Effect of Magnetic Stimulation Added to Bladder Training in Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial". Development of a Clinically Relevant Preclinical Animal Model to Mimic Suburethral Implantation of Support Materials for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Impact of Overactive Bladder and Dry Mouth on Subjective and Comprehensive Sleep Quality in Older Adults With Nocturia. Patient Reported Outcomes Due to Bladder Neck Obstruction in Women Treated With Botulinum Toxin A Injection. Trends in Overactive Bladder Therapy: Associations Between Clinical Care Pathways, Practice Guidelines, and Therapy Utilization Patterns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1