针对心脏肉样瘤病和收缩性心力衰竭患者的药剂师药物滴定计划:回顾性队列研究

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.038965
Daniel Sykora, Nicole Olson, Robert Churchill, B Michelle Kim, Melanie Bratcher, Mohamed Elwazir, Kathleen Young, Sami Ryan, Michelle Brodin, Jan Anderson, Jeremiah Saunders, Omar Abou Ezzeddine, John Bois, John Giudicessi, Leslie Cooper, Andrew Rosenbaum
{"title":"针对心脏肉样瘤病和收缩性心力衰竭患者的药剂师药物滴定计划:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Daniel Sykora, Nicole Olson, Robert Churchill, B Michelle Kim, Melanie Bratcher, Mohamed Elwazir, Kathleen Young, Sami Ryan, Michelle Brodin, Jan Anderson, Jeremiah Saunders, Omar Abou Ezzeddine, John Bois, John Giudicessi, Leslie Cooper, Andrew Rosenbaum","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.038965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is unreported.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional CS clinics, identifying those with a CS diagnosis, HF (LVEF < 50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11-36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) program for GDMT optimization (MTM vs non-MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization [KCMO] score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in KCMO score, LVEF, and cardiovascular event-free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, LVAD/heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age 57 years, 34% female, 64% NYHA Class I-II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean KCMO score was similar at index evaluation (MTM: 23.2; NMTM: 29.6, p=0.83). At follow-up (median 16 months), the KCMO score increased significantly in both groups (MTM: 23.2 to 74.8, p<0.001; NMTM: 29.6 to 58.7, p<0.001), but was higher in MTM (p=0.001). Mean LVEF trended towards higher values in MTM (44.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (HR 11.97 [95%CI 1.58 - 90.54], p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist-led MTM program was associated with favorable GDMT optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in CS patients with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e038965"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pharmacist Medication Titration Program for Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis and Systolic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Sykora, Nicole Olson, Robert Churchill, B Michelle Kim, Melanie Bratcher, Mohamed Elwazir, Kathleen Young, Sami Ryan, Michelle Brodin, Jan Anderson, Jeremiah Saunders, Omar Abou Ezzeddine, John Bois, John Giudicessi, Leslie Cooper, Andrew Rosenbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.124.038965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is unreported.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional CS clinics, identifying those with a CS diagnosis, HF (LVEF < 50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11-36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) program for GDMT optimization (MTM vs non-MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization [KCMO] score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in KCMO score, LVEF, and cardiovascular event-free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, LVAD/heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age 57 years, 34% female, 64% NYHA Class I-II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean KCMO score was similar at index evaluation (MTM: 23.2; NMTM: 29.6, p=0.83). At follow-up (median 16 months), the KCMO score increased significantly in both groups (MTM: 23.2 to 74.8, p<0.001; NMTM: 29.6 to 58.7, p<0.001), but was higher in MTM (p=0.001). Mean LVEF trended towards higher values in MTM (44.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (HR 11.97 [95%CI 1.58 - 90.54], p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist-led MTM program was associated with favorable GDMT optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in CS patients with HF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e038965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多学科方法改善了收缩性心力衰竭(HF)的指导性药物治疗(GDMT),但其对心脏肉样瘤病(CS)所致HF患者的疗效却未见报道:在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们对本机构 CS 诊所的 848 名患者进行了复查,确定了那些确诊为 CS、HF(LVEF 结论:LVEF 为 0.5%)和 HF(LVEF 为 0.5%)的患者:在这项回顾性队列研究中,由药剂师主导的 MTM 计划与良好的 GDMT 优化和较低的 CS HF 患者不良心血管后果风险有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Pharmacist Medication Titration Program for Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis and Systolic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is unreported.

Methods and results: In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional CS clinics, identifying those with a CS diagnosis, HF (LVEF < 50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11-36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) program for GDMT optimization (MTM vs non-MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization [KCMO] score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in KCMO score, LVEF, and cardiovascular event-free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, LVAD/heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age 57 years, 34% female, 64% NYHA Class I-II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean KCMO score was similar at index evaluation (MTM: 23.2; NMTM: 29.6, p=0.83). At follow-up (median 16 months), the KCMO score increased significantly in both groups (MTM: 23.2 to 74.8, p<0.001; NMTM: 29.6 to 58.7, p<0.001), but was higher in MTM (p=0.001). Mean LVEF trended towards higher values in MTM (44.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (HR 11.97 [95%CI 1.58 - 90.54], p=0.002).

Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist-led MTM program was associated with favorable GDMT optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in CS patients with HF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular Outcomes Associated With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Versus Other Types of Single Right Ventricle: A Multicenter Study. Cigarette Smoking, Smoking Cessation, and Heart Failure Subtypes: Insights From the Jackson Heart Study. Clonal Hematopoiesis in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Combined Effects of Air Pollution and Changes in Physical Activity With Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Dyslipidemia. Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Is Associated With Augmented Lysosomal Signaling in Hypercholesterolemic Mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1