在美国外科学院认可的癌症项目中推广常规吸烟评估的全国性 Just ASK 行动的纵向结果。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00304
Jessica L Burris, Jamie S Ostroff, Eileen M Reilly, Graham W Warren, Rachel C Shelton, Timothy W Mullett
{"title":"在美国外科学院认可的癌症项目中推广常规吸烟评估的全国性 Just ASK 行动的纵向结果。","authors":"Jessica L Burris, Jamie S Ostroff, Eileen M Reilly, Graham W Warren, Rachel C Shelton, Timothy W Mullett","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Persistent smoking after cancer diagnosis causes adverse outcomes while smoking cessation can improve survival. Thus, integration of smoking assessment and cessation assistance into routine cancer care is critical. Aiming for incremental practice change that could be sustained and built upon through future quality improvement (QI) projects, the American College of Surgeons initiated Just ASK in 2022 to increase implementation of smoking assessment among its accredited Cancer Programs. This manuscript describes outcomes from Just ASK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven hundred sixty-two programs enrolled in this cohort study, followed Plan Do Study Act methodology, and used local QI teams to facilitate practice change. The primary outcome was the ask rate (ie, patients asked/patients seen). Programs completed three surveys across the 1-year study (89.8% retention), answering questions about their program plus organizational readiness, implementation barriers, implementation strategies, and clinical practices related to assessing smoking among patients newly diagnosed with cancer. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and analysis of change over time (eg, McNemar chi-squares).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Programs (53.1% community-based) tended to report moderate organizational readiness, multiple implementation barriers, and adoption of 4.63 ± 1.49 of eight possible implementation strategies (eg, training staff/providers). Programs reported frequency of assessing smoking status, documenting it in the electronic health record, advising patients who smoke to quit, and documenting advice and treatment increased over time (all <i>P</i> < .001). The ask rate increased from baseline to mid to final survey (<i>P</i> < .01; 87.79% <i>v</i> 88.65% <i>v</i> 91.92%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Just ASK is the latest, and by far the largest, endeavor to improve assessment of cancer patients' smoking status. Participants reported significant advances within a short time span and study results underscore the potential for national accreditation organizations to transform oncology practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2400304"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal Results From the Nationwide Just ASK Initiative to Promote Routine Smoking Assessment in American College of Surgeons-Accredited Cancer Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L Burris, Jamie S Ostroff, Eileen M Reilly, Graham W Warren, Rachel C Shelton, Timothy W Mullett\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.24.00304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Persistent smoking after cancer diagnosis causes adverse outcomes while smoking cessation can improve survival. Thus, integration of smoking assessment and cessation assistance into routine cancer care is critical. Aiming for incremental practice change that could be sustained and built upon through future quality improvement (QI) projects, the American College of Surgeons initiated Just ASK in 2022 to increase implementation of smoking assessment among its accredited Cancer Programs. This manuscript describes outcomes from Just ASK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven hundred sixty-two programs enrolled in this cohort study, followed Plan Do Study Act methodology, and used local QI teams to facilitate practice change. The primary outcome was the ask rate (ie, patients asked/patients seen). Programs completed three surveys across the 1-year study (89.8% retention), answering questions about their program plus organizational readiness, implementation barriers, implementation strategies, and clinical practices related to assessing smoking among patients newly diagnosed with cancer. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and analysis of change over time (eg, McNemar chi-squares).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Programs (53.1% community-based) tended to report moderate organizational readiness, multiple implementation barriers, and adoption of 4.63 ± 1.49 of eight possible implementation strategies (eg, training staff/providers). Programs reported frequency of assessing smoking status, documenting it in the electronic health record, advising patients who smoke to quit, and documenting advice and treatment increased over time (all <i>P</i> < .001). The ask rate increased from baseline to mid to final survey (<i>P</i> < .01; 87.79% <i>v</i> 88.65% <i>v</i> 91.92%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Just ASK is the latest, and by far the largest, endeavor to improve assessment of cancer patients' smoking status. Participants reported significant advances within a short time span and study results underscore the potential for national accreditation organizations to transform oncology practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2400304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00304\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00304","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癌症确诊后持续吸烟会导致不良后果,而戒烟则可提高生存率。因此,将吸烟评估和戒烟援助纳入常规癌症治疗至关重要。美国外科医生学会于 2022 年启动了 Just ASK 项目,旨在通过未来的质量改进(QI)项目,实现可持续发展的渐进式实践变革,以提高其认可的癌症项目中吸烟评估的实施率。本手稿介绍了 Just ASK 的成果:762 个项目参与了这项队列研究,遵循 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "的方法,并利用当地 QI 团队促进实践变革。主要结果是问诊率(即问诊患者/就诊患者)。在为期一年的研究中,各项目完成了三项调查(89.8% 的保留率),回答了有关其项目、组织准备情况、实施障碍、实施策略以及与评估新诊断癌症患者吸烟情况相关的临床实践等问题。数据分析包括描述性统计和随时间变化的分析(例如,McNemar chi-squares):项目(53.1%以社区为基础)倾向于报告中等程度的组织准备情况、多重实施障碍,并采用了八种可能的实施策略中的4.63 ± 1.49种(例如,培训员工/医疗服务提供者)。据项目报告,评估吸烟状况、在电子健康记录中记录吸烟状况、建议吸烟患者戒烟以及记录建议和治疗的频率随着时间的推移而增加(所有P < .001)。从基线调查到中期调查再到最终调查,询问率均有所上升(P < .01; 分别为 87.79% v 88.65% v 91.92%):结论:Just ASK 是最新的,也是迄今为止规模最大的一项旨在改善癌症患者吸烟状况评估的工作。参与者报告称在短时间内取得了重大进展,研究结果凸显了国家评审组织改变肿瘤学实践的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Longitudinal Results From the Nationwide Just ASK Initiative to Promote Routine Smoking Assessment in American College of Surgeons-Accredited Cancer Programs.

Purpose: Persistent smoking after cancer diagnosis causes adverse outcomes while smoking cessation can improve survival. Thus, integration of smoking assessment and cessation assistance into routine cancer care is critical. Aiming for incremental practice change that could be sustained and built upon through future quality improvement (QI) projects, the American College of Surgeons initiated Just ASK in 2022 to increase implementation of smoking assessment among its accredited Cancer Programs. This manuscript describes outcomes from Just ASK.

Methods: Seven hundred sixty-two programs enrolled in this cohort study, followed Plan Do Study Act methodology, and used local QI teams to facilitate practice change. The primary outcome was the ask rate (ie, patients asked/patients seen). Programs completed three surveys across the 1-year study (89.8% retention), answering questions about their program plus organizational readiness, implementation barriers, implementation strategies, and clinical practices related to assessing smoking among patients newly diagnosed with cancer. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and analysis of change over time (eg, McNemar chi-squares).

Results: Programs (53.1% community-based) tended to report moderate organizational readiness, multiple implementation barriers, and adoption of 4.63 ± 1.49 of eight possible implementation strategies (eg, training staff/providers). Programs reported frequency of assessing smoking status, documenting it in the electronic health record, advising patients who smoke to quit, and documenting advice and treatment increased over time (all P < .001). The ask rate increased from baseline to mid to final survey (P < .01; 87.79% v 88.65% v 91.92%, respectively).

Conclusion: Just ASK is the latest, and by far the largest, endeavor to improve assessment of cancer patients' smoking status. Participants reported significant advances within a short time span and study results underscore the potential for national accreditation organizations to transform oncology practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intermittent or Continuous Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan for First-Line Treatment of RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The IMPROVE Trial. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Trial on Survival Evaluation (HORSE; MITO-18). Effectiveness of a Cardiovascular Health Electronic Health Record Application for Cancer Survivors in Community Oncology Practice: Results From WF-1804CD. US Food and Drug Administration's Directive to Deal With Delayed Confirmatory Trials: Lessons From Pralatrexate and Belinostat for T-Cell Lymphoma. Improving Access to Patient-Focused, Decentralized Clinical Trials Requires Streamlined Regulatory Requirements: An ASCO Research Statement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1