比较纳他珠单抗对儿童发病型多发性硬化症患者和成人发病型多发性硬化症患者的 SDMT 的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1475161
Marco Puthenparampil, Graziana Scialpi, Marta Gaggiola, Giovanni Zanotelli, Alessandro Miscioscia, Angela Berardi, Alice Riccardi, Margherita Nosadini, Stefano Sartori, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Paolo Gallo
{"title":"比较纳他珠单抗对儿童发病型多发性硬化症患者和成人发病型多发性硬化症患者的 SDMT 的影响。","authors":"Marco Puthenparampil, Graziana Scialpi, Marta Gaggiola, Giovanni Zanotelli, Alessandro Miscioscia, Angela Berardi, Alice Riccardi, Margherita Nosadini, Stefano Sartori, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Paolo Gallo","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1475161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) patients often exhibit a wide range of cognitive deficits. Therefore, therapeutic approaches should aim not only to prevent cognitive decline but also to promote cognitive improvement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the effects of natalizumab (NTZ) on cognitive function, as measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), in both POMS and adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS) patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 63 patients (34 AOMS and 29 POMS) were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Patients were clinically and radiologically assessed every 6 months, and they completed the SDMT at baseline and after at least 24 months of follow-up. SDMT values were reported as corrected values (cSDMT) and z-scores (zSDMT). Annualized cSDMT and zSDMT scores were calculated by dividing the change in scores by the length of the follow-up period (expressed in years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both POMS and AOMS groups showed improvement in annualized cSDMT and zSDMT scores, but the improvement was significantly greater in the POMS group compared to the AOMS group (+3.85 ± 4.32 vs. +1.76 ± 2.80, <i>p</i> = 0.010 for cSDMT; 0.41 ± 0.40 vs. 0.25 ± 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.026 for zSDMT). After re-baselining at 6 months, 93% of POMS patients (27 patients) and 85.3% of AOMS patients (29 patients, <i>p</i> = 0.84) achieved NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity). The NEDA-3 status, along with clinical and demographic parameters at baseline, did not account for the observed SDMT improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The favorable clinical, radiological, and neuropsychological outcomes observed in this study support the use of natalizumab as a viable treatment option in POMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1475161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of natalizumab's effects on SDMT between pediatric-onset and adult-onset multiple sclerosis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Puthenparampil, Graziana Scialpi, Marta Gaggiola, Giovanni Zanotelli, Alessandro Miscioscia, Angela Berardi, Alice Riccardi, Margherita Nosadini, Stefano Sartori, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Paolo Gallo\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneur.2024.1475161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) patients often exhibit a wide range of cognitive deficits. Therefore, therapeutic approaches should aim not only to prevent cognitive decline but also to promote cognitive improvement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the effects of natalizumab (NTZ) on cognitive function, as measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), in both POMS and adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS) patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 63 patients (34 AOMS and 29 POMS) were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Patients were clinically and radiologically assessed every 6 months, and they completed the SDMT at baseline and after at least 24 months of follow-up. SDMT values were reported as corrected values (cSDMT) and z-scores (zSDMT). Annualized cSDMT and zSDMT scores were calculated by dividing the change in scores by the length of the follow-up period (expressed in years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both POMS and AOMS groups showed improvement in annualized cSDMT and zSDMT scores, but the improvement was significantly greater in the POMS group compared to the AOMS group (+3.85 ± 4.32 vs. +1.76 ± 2.80, <i>p</i> = 0.010 for cSDMT; 0.41 ± 0.40 vs. 0.25 ± 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.026 for zSDMT). After re-baselining at 6 months, 93% of POMS patients (27 patients) and 85.3% of AOMS patients (29 patients, <i>p</i> = 0.84) achieved NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity). The NEDA-3 status, along with clinical and demographic parameters at baseline, did not account for the observed SDMT improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The favorable clinical, radiological, and neuropsychological outcomes observed in this study support the use of natalizumab as a viable treatment option in POMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1475161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1475161\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1475161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小儿多发性硬化症(POMS)患者通常表现出多种认知障碍。因此,治疗方法不仅要防止认知功能下降,还要促进认知功能的改善:本研究旨在探讨纳他珠单抗(NTZ)对多发性硬化症患者和成人型多发性硬化症患者认知功能的影响:这项回顾性单中心研究共招募了 63 名患者(34 名 AOMS 患者和 29 名 POMS 患者)。患者每6个月接受一次临床和放射学评估,并在基线和至少24个月的随访后完成SDMT。SDMT值以校正值(cSDMT)和z分数(zSDMT)的形式报告。cSDMT和zSDMT的年化分数是用分数变化除以随访时间(以年为单位)计算得出的:结果:POMS组和AOMS组的cSDMT和zSDMT年化得分均有改善,但POMS组的改善幅度明显大于AOMS组(cSDMT为+3.85 ± 4.32 vs. +1.76 ± 2.80,p = 0.010;zSDMT为0.41 ± 0.40 vs. 0.25 ± 0.34,p = 0.026)。在6个月重新进行基础研究后,93%的POMS患者(27人)和85.3%的AOMS患者(29人,p = 0.84)达到了NEDA-3(无疾病活动迹象)。NEDA-3状态以及基线时的临床和人口统计学参数并不能解释观察到的SDMT改善:结论:本研究观察到的良好临床、放射学和神经心理学结果支持将纳他珠单抗作为治疗 POMS 的可行方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of natalizumab's effects on SDMT between pediatric-onset and adult-onset multiple sclerosis patients.

Background: Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) patients often exhibit a wide range of cognitive deficits. Therefore, therapeutic approaches should aim not only to prevent cognitive decline but also to promote cognitive improvement.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the effects of natalizumab (NTZ) on cognitive function, as measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), in both POMS and adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS) patients.

Method: A total of 63 patients (34 AOMS and 29 POMS) were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Patients were clinically and radiologically assessed every 6 months, and they completed the SDMT at baseline and after at least 24 months of follow-up. SDMT values were reported as corrected values (cSDMT) and z-scores (zSDMT). Annualized cSDMT and zSDMT scores were calculated by dividing the change in scores by the length of the follow-up period (expressed in years).

Results: Both POMS and AOMS groups showed improvement in annualized cSDMT and zSDMT scores, but the improvement was significantly greater in the POMS group compared to the AOMS group (+3.85 ± 4.32 vs. +1.76 ± 2.80, p = 0.010 for cSDMT; 0.41 ± 0.40 vs. 0.25 ± 0.34, p = 0.026 for zSDMT). After re-baselining at 6 months, 93% of POMS patients (27 patients) and 85.3% of AOMS patients (29 patients, p = 0.84) achieved NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity). The NEDA-3 status, along with clinical and demographic parameters at baseline, did not account for the observed SDMT improvement.

Conclusion: The favorable clinical, radiological, and neuropsychological outcomes observed in this study support the use of natalizumab as a viable treatment option in POMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Association between platelet-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and future stroke risk: a national cohort study based on CHARLS. Biopsychosocial rehabilitation therapy in small fiber neuropathy: research protocol to study the effect of rehabilitation treatment. Causal associations of ischemic stroke, metabolic factors, and related medications with epilepsy: a Mendelian randomization study. Editorial: Sudden deafness. Evaluating the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the performance-oriented mobility assessment among patients with chronic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1