欧洲剖腹产率及其对产科专家培训的影响:欧洲妇产科委员会(EBCOG)培训认证医院访问计划常设委员会的定性审查:

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.044
Juriy Wladimiroff , Sofia Tsiapakidou , Tahir Mahmood , Petr Velebil
{"title":"欧洲剖腹产率及其对产科专家培训的影响:欧洲妇产科委员会(EBCOG)培训认证医院访问计划常设委员会的定性审查:","authors":"Juriy Wladimiroff ,&nbsp;Sofia Tsiapakidou ,&nbsp;Tahir Mahmood ,&nbsp;Petr Velebil","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Information is presented from hospital visiting reports with focus on Caesarean section and vaginal instrumental delivery rates from training units in European countries during the period 1999 -2023. In a considerable number of countries training units were audited more than once, allowing assessment of trends in both obstetric interventions. There is a notable rise in Caesarean section rate in a number of European countries, with the highest rates in Poland (55.1%), Turkey (54.8%) and Greece (48.6%). Conversely Caesarean sections were low in France (19.3%) associated with a higher rate of instrumental vaginal delivery rates. Some countries like Germany and Poland have high variability in their rates, indicating fluctuations or regional differences over the years.</div><div>Vaginal instrumental delivery rates varied across countries having very low rates (Turkey with 1.0% and Poland with 1.2%) and others having relatively high rates (like Switzerland, France and Belgium). Germany and Belgium showed a balanced use of both Caesarean sections and vaginal instrumental deliveries but with considerable variability in both practices. Countries in Central Europe display marked differences in Caesarean section rate: Hungary 37.8%; Slovakia 34.5%, Czech Republic 27.5% and Slovenia 20.7%. Apart from Poland (1.2%), differences in vaginal instrumental delivery rate between these countries are relatively small with Hungary 2.7%, Slovakia 2.8% , Czech Republic 2.9% and Slovenia 2.9%. Low instrumental delivery rates have major effect on the quality of training for the trainees in their formative years. Having a limited experience in this area of clinical practice would influence their future clinical obstetric practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"304 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caesarean section rates across Europe and its impact on specialist training in Obstetrics: A qualitative review by the Standing Committee of Hospital Visiting Programme for Training Recognition of the European Board and College of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG):\",\"authors\":\"Juriy Wladimiroff ,&nbsp;Sofia Tsiapakidou ,&nbsp;Tahir Mahmood ,&nbsp;Petr Velebil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Information is presented from hospital visiting reports with focus on Caesarean section and vaginal instrumental delivery rates from training units in European countries during the period 1999 -2023. In a considerable number of countries training units were audited more than once, allowing assessment of trends in both obstetric interventions. There is a notable rise in Caesarean section rate in a number of European countries, with the highest rates in Poland (55.1%), Turkey (54.8%) and Greece (48.6%). Conversely Caesarean sections were low in France (19.3%) associated with a higher rate of instrumental vaginal delivery rates. Some countries like Germany and Poland have high variability in their rates, indicating fluctuations or regional differences over the years.</div><div>Vaginal instrumental delivery rates varied across countries having very low rates (Turkey with 1.0% and Poland with 1.2%) and others having relatively high rates (like Switzerland, France and Belgium). Germany and Belgium showed a balanced use of both Caesarean sections and vaginal instrumental deliveries but with considerable variability in both practices. Countries in Central Europe display marked differences in Caesarean section rate: Hungary 37.8%; Slovakia 34.5%, Czech Republic 27.5% and Slovenia 20.7%. Apart from Poland (1.2%), differences in vaginal instrumental delivery rate between these countries are relatively small with Hungary 2.7%, Slovakia 2.8% , Czech Republic 2.9% and Slovenia 2.9%. Low instrumental delivery rates have major effect on the quality of training for the trainees in their formative years. Having a limited experience in this area of clinical practice would influence their future clinical obstetric practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"volume\":\"304 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了 1999 年至 2023 年期间欧洲国家培训单位的医院访视报告信息,重点关注剖腹产率和阴道器械接生率。在相当多的国家中,对培训单位进行了不止一次的审计,从而对这两种产科干预措施的趋势进行了评估。一些欧洲国家的剖腹产率明显上升,其中波兰(55.1%)、土耳其(54.8%)和希腊(48.6%)的剖腹产率最高。相反,法国的剖腹产率较低(19.3%),这与较高的器械阴道分娩率有关。一些国家(如德国和波兰)的阴道器械接生率变化很大,表明多年来存在波动或地区差异。不同国家的阴道器械接生率各不相同,有的国家接生率很低(土耳其为 1.0%,波兰为 1.2%),有的国家接生率相对较高(如瑞士、法国和比利时)。德国和比利时的剖腹产率和阴道器械接生率比较均衡,但两者的差异很大。中欧国家的剖腹产率差异明显:匈牙利为 37.8%,斯洛伐克为 34.5%,捷克共和国为 27.5%,斯洛文尼亚为 20.7%。除波兰(1.2%)外,这些国家的阴道器械接生率差异相对较小,匈牙利为 2.7%,斯洛伐克为 2.8%,捷克共和国为 2.9%,斯洛文尼亚为 2.9%。器械接生率低对处于成长期的学员的培训质量有很大影响。在这一领域的临床实践经验有限,将影响他们未来的临床产科实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caesarean section rates across Europe and its impact on specialist training in Obstetrics: A qualitative review by the Standing Committee of Hospital Visiting Programme for Training Recognition of the European Board and College of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG):
Information is presented from hospital visiting reports with focus on Caesarean section and vaginal instrumental delivery rates from training units in European countries during the period 1999 -2023. In a considerable number of countries training units were audited more than once, allowing assessment of trends in both obstetric interventions. There is a notable rise in Caesarean section rate in a number of European countries, with the highest rates in Poland (55.1%), Turkey (54.8%) and Greece (48.6%). Conversely Caesarean sections were low in France (19.3%) associated with a higher rate of instrumental vaginal delivery rates. Some countries like Germany and Poland have high variability in their rates, indicating fluctuations or regional differences over the years.
Vaginal instrumental delivery rates varied across countries having very low rates (Turkey with 1.0% and Poland with 1.2%) and others having relatively high rates (like Switzerland, France and Belgium). Germany and Belgium showed a balanced use of both Caesarean sections and vaginal instrumental deliveries but with considerable variability in both practices. Countries in Central Europe display marked differences in Caesarean section rate: Hungary 37.8%; Slovakia 34.5%, Czech Republic 27.5% and Slovenia 20.7%. Apart from Poland (1.2%), differences in vaginal instrumental delivery rate between these countries are relatively small with Hungary 2.7%, Slovakia 2.8% , Czech Republic 2.9% and Slovenia 2.9%. Low instrumental delivery rates have major effect on the quality of training for the trainees in their formative years. Having a limited experience in this area of clinical practice would influence their future clinical obstetric practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Inside Back Cover - Editors with images Corrigendum to “Prophylactic tranexamic acid during myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 276 (2022) 82–91] Survival outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with disease involving the lower uterine segment: A meta-analysis Outcomes of first assisted reproductive technology treatment in infertile women with and without antinuclear antibodies: A prospective cohort study Maternal and neonatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labor with delayed pushing: A study of French Perinatal practices before and after guideline changes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1