在假体周围股骨骨折的手术治疗中使用 1 毫米 Cerclage 缆索。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593241302655
Harrison S Brown, Bryce Wall, Simon C Mears, Benjamin M Stronach, Eric R Siegel, Jeffrey B Stambough
{"title":"在假体周围股骨骨折的手术治疗中使用 1 毫米 Cerclage 缆索。","authors":"Harrison S Brown, Bryce Wall, Simon C Mears, Benjamin M Stronach, Eric R Siegel, Jeffrey B Stambough","doi":"10.1177/21514593241302655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>1 mm cerclage cables have been introduced that can be placed under plates and hold reduction of periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Their utilization remains controversial due to the risk of nonunion secondary to periosteal stripping associated for their application. We compared surgical outcomes in patients with THA PPFFx treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and cables vs patients with PPFFx treated with ORIF without cables. We hypothesized that cable use would decrease hardware failure and nonunion rates.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 42 cases of PPFFx around THA performed from 2015 to 2021. Twenty-three PPFFx were treated with plate and 1 mm cerclage cables, and 19 PPFFx were treated with plate without cables. Primary surgical outcomes included hardware failure, nonunion, reoperation, and time to radiographic union.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in nonunion rates: 9% in the cerclage cable group vs 16% in the plate-only group (<i>P</i> = .64). The average time to union was 6.0 months among 17 observed unions in the cerclage cable group, vs 8.0 months among 15 observed unions in the plate-only group, but this failed to reach significance (<i>P</i> = .12). There was no statistical difference in overall complication rates (13% cerclage vs 16% plate) requiring reoperation (<i>P</i> = 1.0).</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>The utilization of 1 mm cerclage cables to hold reduction of PPFFx provides an easy method to hold fixation with a low overall complication rate and no significant differences in nonunion rate or time to union when compared to cases performed without cables.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"15 ","pages":"21514593241302655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of 1 mm Cerclage Cables in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Harrison S Brown, Bryce Wall, Simon C Mears, Benjamin M Stronach, Eric R Siegel, Jeffrey B Stambough\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21514593241302655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>1 mm cerclage cables have been introduced that can be placed under plates and hold reduction of periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Their utilization remains controversial due to the risk of nonunion secondary to periosteal stripping associated for their application. We compared surgical outcomes in patients with THA PPFFx treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and cables vs patients with PPFFx treated with ORIF without cables. We hypothesized that cable use would decrease hardware failure and nonunion rates.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 42 cases of PPFFx around THA performed from 2015 to 2021. Twenty-three PPFFx were treated with plate and 1 mm cerclage cables, and 19 PPFFx were treated with plate without cables. Primary surgical outcomes included hardware failure, nonunion, reoperation, and time to radiographic union.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in nonunion rates: 9% in the cerclage cable group vs 16% in the plate-only group (<i>P</i> = .64). The average time to union was 6.0 months among 17 observed unions in the cerclage cable group, vs 8.0 months among 15 observed unions in the plate-only group, but this failed to reach significance (<i>P</i> = .12). There was no statistical difference in overall complication rates (13% cerclage vs 16% plate) requiring reoperation (<i>P</i> = 1.0).</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>The utilization of 1 mm cerclage cables to hold reduction of PPFFx provides an easy method to hold fixation with a low overall complication rate and no significant differences in nonunion rate or time to union when compared to cases performed without cables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"21514593241302655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241302655\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241302655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:1毫米的Cerclage缆线可放置在钢板下,用于全髋关节置换术(THA)中股骨假体周围骨折(PPFFx)的复位。由于在使用过程中存在因骨膜剥离而继发不愈合的风险,因此对其使用仍存在争议。我们比较了采用开放复位内固定术(ORIF)和缆线治疗的全髋关节置换术 PPFFx 患者与不使用缆线的开放复位内固定术 PPFFx 患者的手术效果。我们假设使用钢缆可降低硬件故障率和不愈合率:我们回顾性分析了2015年至2021年期间在THA周围进行的42例PPFFx病例。23例PPFFx使用钢板和1毫米cerclage钢索治疗,19例PPFFx使用钢板而不使用钢索治疗。主要手术结果包括硬件故障、不愈合、再次手术和影像学愈合时间:结果:未愈合率无明显差异:结果:未愈合率无明显差异:Cerclage钢缆组为9%,纯钢板组为16%(P = .64)。Cerclage电缆组17个观察到的骨结合平均时间为6.0个月,而纯板组15个观察到的骨结合平均时间为8.0个月,但两者之间没有显著性差异(P = .12)。需要再次手术的总体并发症发生率(cerclage 13% vs plate 16%)没有统计学差异(P = 1.0):讨论与结论:使用1毫米的cerclage钢缆固定PPFFx的缩小部分,提供了一种简单的固定方法,总体并发症发生率较低,与不使用钢缆的病例相比,非愈合率和愈合时间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of 1 mm Cerclage Cables in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

Introduction: 1 mm cerclage cables have been introduced that can be placed under plates and hold reduction of periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Their utilization remains controversial due to the risk of nonunion secondary to periosteal stripping associated for their application. We compared surgical outcomes in patients with THA PPFFx treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and cables vs patients with PPFFx treated with ORIF without cables. We hypothesized that cable use would decrease hardware failure and nonunion rates.

Materials & methods: We retrospectively reviewed 42 cases of PPFFx around THA performed from 2015 to 2021. Twenty-three PPFFx were treated with plate and 1 mm cerclage cables, and 19 PPFFx were treated with plate without cables. Primary surgical outcomes included hardware failure, nonunion, reoperation, and time to radiographic union.

Results: There was no significant difference in nonunion rates: 9% in the cerclage cable group vs 16% in the plate-only group (P = .64). The average time to union was 6.0 months among 17 observed unions in the cerclage cable group, vs 8.0 months among 15 observed unions in the plate-only group, but this failed to reach significance (P = .12). There was no statistical difference in overall complication rates (13% cerclage vs 16% plate) requiring reoperation (P = 1.0).

Discussion & conclusion: The utilization of 1 mm cerclage cables to hold reduction of PPFFx provides an easy method to hold fixation with a low overall complication rate and no significant differences in nonunion rate or time to union when compared to cases performed without cables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Low Rate of Teriparatide Supplementation for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures in Elderly Females. Use of 1 mm Cerclage Cables in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures. Evaluation of Post-Operative Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fracture Interventions: A Systematic Review. The Second Hip Fracture is not an Independent Predictor of Poor Outcomes in Elderly Patients - A Case-Control Study. Hip Fracture Patterns, Hospital Course, and Mortality Differ Between Males and Females.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1