微创单侧椎弓根结合对侧经椎板面关节螺钉固定治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病:十年随访研究》。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005224
Bochen An, Bowen Ren, Yihao Liu, Qingzu Liu, Chongyang Liu, Zhenchuan Han, Jianhui Wu, Keya Mao, Jianheng Liu
{"title":"微创单侧椎弓根结合对侧经椎板面关节螺钉固定治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病:十年随访研究》。","authors":"Bochen An, Bowen Ren, Yihao Liu, Qingzu Liu, Chongyang Liu, Zhenchuan Han, Jianhui Wu, Keya Mao, Jianheng Liu","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective study compared unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet joint screw (UPS+TFS) fixation with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the long-term clinical efficacy of UPS+TFS fixation and BPS fixation in MIS-TLIF.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Limited research exists on the long-term clinical outcomes of UPS+TFS fixation in MIS-TLIF. This study addresses this gap by comparing UPS+TFS with the more common BPS fixation technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 151 patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with MIS-TLIF at XXX Hospital (March 2011-December 2012) was conducted. Propensity score matching (1:1) resulted in 32 patients per group (UPS+TFS and BPS). Basic demographic characteristics, preoperative functional scores, perioperative indicators, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Lumbar and leg Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores up to 10 years postoperatively were also compared. The surgical outcomes of both groups were evaluated using the MacNab criteria at the final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UPS+TFS group had significantly lower lumbar VAS scores at three months postoperatively (P<0.05) with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter surgery time, and reduced hospital stay compared to the BPS group (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the JOA or ODI scores between the two groups at 3 months and 1, 3, 5, and 10 years post-surgery (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UPS+TFS and BPS fixation during MIS-TLIF can achieve favorable clinical outcomes with no difference in long-term clinical efficacy. UPS+TFS demonstrates perioperative advantages such as reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, reduced postoperative hospital stay, and less iatrogenic injury. Therefore, MIS-TLIF with UPS+TFS fixation is a reliable treatment for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Unilateral Pedicle Combined with Contralateral Translaminar Facet Joint Screw Fixation for single-segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A 10-year follow-up Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bochen An, Bowen Ren, Yihao Liu, Qingzu Liu, Chongyang Liu, Zhenchuan Han, Jianhui Wu, Keya Mao, Jianheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective study compared unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet joint screw (UPS+TFS) fixation with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the long-term clinical efficacy of UPS+TFS fixation and BPS fixation in MIS-TLIF.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Limited research exists on the long-term clinical outcomes of UPS+TFS fixation in MIS-TLIF. This study addresses this gap by comparing UPS+TFS with the more common BPS fixation technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 151 patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with MIS-TLIF at XXX Hospital (March 2011-December 2012) was conducted. Propensity score matching (1:1) resulted in 32 patients per group (UPS+TFS and BPS). Basic demographic characteristics, preoperative functional scores, perioperative indicators, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Lumbar and leg Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores up to 10 years postoperatively were also compared. The surgical outcomes of both groups were evaluated using the MacNab criteria at the final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UPS+TFS group had significantly lower lumbar VAS scores at three months postoperatively (P<0.05) with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter surgery time, and reduced hospital stay compared to the BPS group (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the JOA or ODI scores between the two groups at 3 months and 1, 3, 5, and 10 years post-surgery (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UPS+TFS and BPS fixation during MIS-TLIF can achieve favorable clinical outcomes with no difference in long-term clinical efficacy. UPS+TFS demonstrates perioperative advantages such as reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, reduced postoperative hospital stay, and less iatrogenic injury. Therefore, MIS-TLIF with UPS+TFS fixation is a reliable treatment for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:这项回顾性研究比较了在接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病的患者中,单侧椎弓根螺钉联合对侧椎板面关节螺钉(UPS+TFS)固定与双侧椎弓根螺钉(BPS)固定:目的:评估 UPS+TFS 固定和 BPS 固定在 MIS-TLIF 中的长期临床疗效:关于MIS-TLIF中UPS+TFS固定的长期临床疗效的研究有限。本研究通过比较 UPS+TFS 与更常见的 BPS 固定技术,填补了这一空白:方法:对 XXX 医院接受 MIS-TLIF 治疗的 151 例单节段腰椎退行性疾病患者(2011 年 3 月至 2012 年 12 月)进行回顾性分析。通过倾向评分匹配(1:1),每组(UPS+TFS 和 BPS)有 32 名患者。比较了两组患者的基本人口统计学特征、术前功能评分、围手术期指标和术后并发症。此外,还比较了腰部和腿部视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry 失能指数(ODI)和日本骨科协会(JOA)术后 10 年的评分。最终随访时,采用 MacNab 标准对两组患者的手术效果进行了评估:结果:UPS+TFS组术后三个月的腰椎VAS评分明显较低(P0.05):结论:MIS-TLIF术中的UPS+TFS和BPS固定可获得良好的临床效果,且长期临床疗效无差异。UPS+TFS具有围手术期优势,如减少术中失血、缩短手术时间、缩短术后住院时间、减少先天性损伤。因此,采用 UPS+TFS 固定的 MIS-TLIF 是治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimally Invasive Unilateral Pedicle Combined with Contralateral Translaminar Facet Joint Screw Fixation for single-segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A 10-year follow-up Study.

Study design: This retrospective study compared unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet joint screw (UPS+TFS) fixation with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.

Objective: To assess the long-term clinical efficacy of UPS+TFS fixation and BPS fixation in MIS-TLIF.

Summary of background data: Limited research exists on the long-term clinical outcomes of UPS+TFS fixation in MIS-TLIF. This study addresses this gap by comparing UPS+TFS with the more common BPS fixation technique.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 151 patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with MIS-TLIF at XXX Hospital (March 2011-December 2012) was conducted. Propensity score matching (1:1) resulted in 32 patients per group (UPS+TFS and BPS). Basic demographic characteristics, preoperative functional scores, perioperative indicators, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Lumbar and leg Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores up to 10 years postoperatively were also compared. The surgical outcomes of both groups were evaluated using the MacNab criteria at the final follow-up.

Results: The UPS+TFS group had significantly lower lumbar VAS scores at three months postoperatively (P<0.05) with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter surgery time, and reduced hospital stay compared to the BPS group (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the JOA or ODI scores between the two groups at 3 months and 1, 3, 5, and 10 years post-surgery (P>0.05).

Conclusion: UPS+TFS and BPS fixation during MIS-TLIF can achieve favorable clinical outcomes with no difference in long-term clinical efficacy. UPS+TFS demonstrates perioperative advantages such as reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, reduced postoperative hospital stay, and less iatrogenic injury. Therefore, MIS-TLIF with UPS+TFS fixation is a reliable treatment for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Temporal Trends of Improvement After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Intraoperative Hypotension Is an Important Modifiable Risk Factor for Major Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery. Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients With Long-term Follow-up. Does Paraspinal Muscle Mass Predict Lumbar Lordosis Before and After Decompression for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis? The Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in Assessing the Risk of Perioperative Complications Following Spinal Fusion Surgery for Pediatric Patients With Scoliosis and Cerebral Palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1