公众对保护、恢复和加速适应大堡礁气候变化的新型干预措施的支持

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean & Coastal Management Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107489
Henry A. Bartelet , Stewart Lockie , Brent W. Ritchie , Csilla Demeter , Lintje Sie , Bruce Taylor
{"title":"公众对保护、恢复和加速适应大堡礁气候变化的新型干预措施的支持","authors":"Henry A. Bartelet ,&nbsp;Stewart Lockie ,&nbsp;Brent W. Ritchie ,&nbsp;Csilla Demeter ,&nbsp;Lintje Sie ,&nbsp;Bruce Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Novel technological interventions are under development to build the resilience of ecosystems by providing short-term protection from climate extremes, enhancing recovery from disturbance, and accelerating adaptation to changed climate states. Drawing on surveys of Australian residents (<em>n</em> = 5320) conducted in 2018 and 2022, this paper investigates support for the development and deployment of six novel interventions on the Great Barrier Reef (marine cloud brightening, fogging, rubble stabilization, coral seeding, natural breeding for heat tolerance, and genetic engineering) and how support varies across time, social groups, perception of climate risk, and approach to intervention. It finds strong support for research and small-scale trials of all six interventions although support was highest for coral seeding, followed by rubble stabilization, fogging, natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Reflecting their early stage of development, support for large-scale deployment of novel interventions across the Great Barrier Reef moderated, with respondents indicating strongest support for deployment of coral seeding, rubble stabilization, and fogging and lower support for natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Trust in science to deliver solutions was a consistently strong predictor of support for both intervention R&amp;D and large-scale deployment. The perceived ability to identify and test environmental impacts was a strong predictor of support for scaled deployment. Perceived climate threat, trust in the Reef's management authority, and ethics were also consistently associated with support for intervention R&amp;D and implementation. With the vast majority of Australian residents supporting strong action to protect and restore coral reefs the maintenance of trust in scientists and scientific institutions stands out as critical to support for the implementation of novel interventions at scale, including the ability of researchers to identify and assess the environmental risks of these interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 107489"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public support for novel interventions to protect, restore, and accelerate adaptation to climate change in the Great Barrier Reef\",\"authors\":\"Henry A. Bartelet ,&nbsp;Stewart Lockie ,&nbsp;Brent W. Ritchie ,&nbsp;Csilla Demeter ,&nbsp;Lintje Sie ,&nbsp;Bruce Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Novel technological interventions are under development to build the resilience of ecosystems by providing short-term protection from climate extremes, enhancing recovery from disturbance, and accelerating adaptation to changed climate states. Drawing on surveys of Australian residents (<em>n</em> = 5320) conducted in 2018 and 2022, this paper investigates support for the development and deployment of six novel interventions on the Great Barrier Reef (marine cloud brightening, fogging, rubble stabilization, coral seeding, natural breeding for heat tolerance, and genetic engineering) and how support varies across time, social groups, perception of climate risk, and approach to intervention. It finds strong support for research and small-scale trials of all six interventions although support was highest for coral seeding, followed by rubble stabilization, fogging, natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Reflecting their early stage of development, support for large-scale deployment of novel interventions across the Great Barrier Reef moderated, with respondents indicating strongest support for deployment of coral seeding, rubble stabilization, and fogging and lower support for natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Trust in science to deliver solutions was a consistently strong predictor of support for both intervention R&amp;D and large-scale deployment. The perceived ability to identify and test environmental impacts was a strong predictor of support for scaled deployment. Perceived climate threat, trust in the Reef's management authority, and ethics were also consistently associated with support for intervention R&amp;D and implementation. With the vast majority of Australian residents supporting strong action to protect and restore coral reefs the maintenance of trust in scientists and scientific institutions stands out as critical to support for the implementation of novel interventions at scale, including the ability of researchers to identify and assess the environmental risks of these interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"260 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124004745\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124004745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前正在开发新型技术干预措施,通过提供短期保护以抵御极端气候、加强从干扰中恢复以及加速适应变化的气候状态来增强生态系统的复原力。本文利用 2018 年和 2022 年进行的澳大利亚居民调查(n = 5320),调查了对大堡礁上六种新型干预措施(海洋云增亮、雾化、碎石稳定、珊瑚播种、耐热性自然育种和基因工程)的开发和部署的支持情况,以及不同时间、社会群体、气候风险认知和干预方法之间的支持差异。研究发现,所有六项干预措施的研究和小规模试验都得到了强有力的支持,但支持率最高的是珊瑚播种,其次是瓦砾稳定化、雾化、自然育种、海洋云增亮和基因工程。受访者对在大堡礁大规模部署新型干预措施的支持度有所缓和,这反映出这些干预措施尚处于早期发展阶段,受访者对部署珊瑚播种、瓦砾稳定化和雾化措施的支持度最高,而对自然繁育、海洋云增亮和基因工程的支持度较低。对科学提供解决方案的信任一直是支持干预研究与开发和大规模部署的有力预测因素。识别和测试环境影响的能力是支持大规模部署的有力预测因素。对气候威胁的感知、对珊瑚礁管理机构的信任以及道德规范也与对干预研究与开发和实施的支持密切相关。由于绝大多数澳大利亚居民支持采取强有力的行动来保护和恢复珊瑚礁,因此保持对科学家和科研机构的信任对于支持大规模实施新型干预措施(包括研究人员识别和评估这些干预措施的环境风险的能力)至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public support for novel interventions to protect, restore, and accelerate adaptation to climate change in the Great Barrier Reef
Novel technological interventions are under development to build the resilience of ecosystems by providing short-term protection from climate extremes, enhancing recovery from disturbance, and accelerating adaptation to changed climate states. Drawing on surveys of Australian residents (n = 5320) conducted in 2018 and 2022, this paper investigates support for the development and deployment of six novel interventions on the Great Barrier Reef (marine cloud brightening, fogging, rubble stabilization, coral seeding, natural breeding for heat tolerance, and genetic engineering) and how support varies across time, social groups, perception of climate risk, and approach to intervention. It finds strong support for research and small-scale trials of all six interventions although support was highest for coral seeding, followed by rubble stabilization, fogging, natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Reflecting their early stage of development, support for large-scale deployment of novel interventions across the Great Barrier Reef moderated, with respondents indicating strongest support for deployment of coral seeding, rubble stabilization, and fogging and lower support for natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Trust in science to deliver solutions was a consistently strong predictor of support for both intervention R&D and large-scale deployment. The perceived ability to identify and test environmental impacts was a strong predictor of support for scaled deployment. Perceived climate threat, trust in the Reef's management authority, and ethics were also consistently associated with support for intervention R&D and implementation. With the vast majority of Australian residents supporting strong action to protect and restore coral reefs the maintenance of trust in scientists and scientific institutions stands out as critical to support for the implementation of novel interventions at scale, including the ability of researchers to identify and assess the environmental risks of these interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Asia‒Europe liner shipping network design model considering Arctic route and black carbon tax Energy consumption and emission analysis for electric container ships Evaluating the feasibility of coastal protection scenarios on a city scale across plausible pathways scenarios for both sea level rise and urban development Evaluation of MPA effects on small-scale fisheries: A long-term landings-based monitoring approach Improving the depth and complexity of stakeholder deliberation using images: Experimental evidence from Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1