家庭经颅直流电刺激对慢性疼痛的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241292677
Annibale Antonioni, Andrea Baroni, Giulia Fregna, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Sofia Straudi
{"title":"家庭经颅直流电刺激对慢性疼痛的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Annibale Antonioni, Andrea Baroni, Giulia Fregna, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Sofia Straudi","doi":"10.1177/20552076241292677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying strategies for home-based patient management is crucial. As pain is highly prevalent and imposes significant burdens, interest in its remote management is steadily increasing. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) seems promising in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of home-based tDCS in pain management (PROSPERO, CRD42023452899). The extracted data included clinical conditions, interventions, comparators, outcome measures, adverse effects, and risk of bias; the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 records (9 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 446 participants, 266 undergoing tDCS) were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis showed that home-based tDCS might produce large and clinically relevant improvement in chronic pain intensity at the end of the intervention (standard mean difference [SMD] -0.95, 95% CI -1.34 to -0.56; <i>p</i> < 0.01; 404 participants, low certainty), as well as small clinically unimportant improvement at short-term follow-up (SMD -0.50, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.19; <i>p</i> < 0.01; 160 participants, moderate certainty). A subgroup analysis showed that it might clinically improve the chronic pain related to fibromyalgia and knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, home-based tDCS seems to modulate pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, and heat and cold tolerance at the end of the intervention. Notably, tDCS appeared to be generally safe, well-accepted and easily applied at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low to moderate certainty evidence suggests that home-based self-administered tDCS is a safe and effective tool for managing various types of chronic pain. Further well-designed, large-scale RCTs are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"10 ","pages":"20552076241292677"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Annibale Antonioni, Andrea Baroni, Giulia Fregna, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Sofia Straudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241292677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying strategies for home-based patient management is crucial. As pain is highly prevalent and imposes significant burdens, interest in its remote management is steadily increasing. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) seems promising in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of home-based tDCS in pain management (PROSPERO, CRD42023452899). The extracted data included clinical conditions, interventions, comparators, outcome measures, adverse effects, and risk of bias; the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 records (9 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 446 participants, 266 undergoing tDCS) were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis showed that home-based tDCS might produce large and clinically relevant improvement in chronic pain intensity at the end of the intervention (standard mean difference [SMD] -0.95, 95% CI -1.34 to -0.56; <i>p</i> < 0.01; 404 participants, low certainty), as well as small clinically unimportant improvement at short-term follow-up (SMD -0.50, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.19; <i>p</i> < 0.01; 160 participants, moderate certainty). A subgroup analysis showed that it might clinically improve the chronic pain related to fibromyalgia and knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, home-based tDCS seems to modulate pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, and heat and cold tolerance at the end of the intervention. Notably, tDCS appeared to be generally safe, well-accepted and easily applied at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low to moderate certainty evidence suggests that home-based self-administered tDCS is a safe and effective tool for managing various types of chronic pain. Further well-designed, large-scale RCTs are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"20552076241292677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241292677\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241292677","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:正如 COVID-19 大流行所强调的,确定基于家庭的患者管理策略至关重要。由于疼痛的发病率很高,并给患者带来了沉重的负担,因此对其远程管理的兴趣正在稳步上升。在这种情况下,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)似乎大有可为:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定家庭经颅直流电刺激治疗疼痛的有效性(PROSPERO,CRD42023452899)。提取的数据包括临床条件、干预措施、比较对象、结果测量、不良反应和偏倚风险;并进行了建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)评估:12项记录(9项随机对照试验[RCT],446名参与者,266名接受了tDCS治疗)被纳入系统综述。荟萃分析表明,在干预结束时,基于家庭的 tDCS 可能会对慢性疼痛强度产生较大的、临床相关的改善(标准平均差 [SMD] -0.95,95% CI -1.34 至 -0.56;p p 结论:低度和中度确定性的证据表明,接受 tDCS 治疗的慢性疼痛患者的慢性疼痛强度可能会有所改善:中低度确定性证据表明,家庭自控 tDCS 是一种安全有效的治疗各种慢性疼痛的工具。有必要进一步开展设计良好的大规模 RCT 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: As highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying strategies for home-based patient management is crucial. As pain is highly prevalent and imposes significant burdens, interest in its remote management is steadily increasing. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) seems promising in this context.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of home-based tDCS in pain management (PROSPERO, CRD42023452899). The extracted data included clinical conditions, interventions, comparators, outcome measures, adverse effects, and risk of bias; the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment was carried out.

Results: 12 records (9 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 446 participants, 266 undergoing tDCS) were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis showed that home-based tDCS might produce large and clinically relevant improvement in chronic pain intensity at the end of the intervention (standard mean difference [SMD] -0.95, 95% CI -1.34 to -0.56; p < 0.01; 404 participants, low certainty), as well as small clinically unimportant improvement at short-term follow-up (SMD -0.50, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.19; p < 0.01; 160 participants, moderate certainty). A subgroup analysis showed that it might clinically improve the chronic pain related to fibromyalgia and knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, home-based tDCS seems to modulate pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, and heat and cold tolerance at the end of the intervention. Notably, tDCS appeared to be generally safe, well-accepted and easily applied at home.

Conclusions: Low to moderate certainty evidence suggests that home-based self-administered tDCS is a safe and effective tool for managing various types of chronic pain. Further well-designed, large-scale RCTs are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
期刊最新文献
A national data sharing solution for the prevention and treatment of obesity-a qualitative study of stakeholders' needs. Comparative insights into clinic onboarding and interaction practices for patient engagement in long COVID digital health care. Decoding anxiety: A scoping review of observable cues. The use of assistive technology to promote practical skills in persons with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Effectiveness of computer-based telerehabilitation software (RehaCom) compared to other treatments for patients with cognitive impairments: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1