中重度特应性皮炎瘙痒症患者无需局部治疗的系统性靶向疗法疗效比较:网络荟萃分析。

Mei Xiong, Qiaoli Gao, Hu Ren, Tingting Zhong
{"title":"中重度特应性皮炎瘙痒症患者无需局部治疗的系统性靶向疗法疗效比较:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Mei Xiong, Qiaoli Gao, Hu Ren, Tingting Zhong","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2432930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pruritus is the most prevalent and severe symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This network meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy of systemic targeted monotherapies in alleviating pruritus among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from phase 3/4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until 24 August 2024, focusing on targeted therapies for moderate-to-severe AD. The outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving <i>a</i> ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline on the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). This analysis included both primary endpoints (week 12 or week 16) and secondary endpoints (weeks 2, 4, and 8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven reports comprising 16 studies with 8,462 participants were included. At all time points examined, targeted therapies demonstrated statistically significant efficacy over placebo, with upadacitinib 30 mg showing the highest response rate. The next most effective treatments at the primary endpoint were abrocitinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, dupilumab 300 mg, and lebrikizumab 250 mg. Cumulative ranking probabilities at secondary endpoints varied based on time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted therapies, particularly upadacitinib 30 mg, showed significant advantages in managing moderate-to-severe AD pruritus. Further direct comparative trials are needed for conclusive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2432930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for pruritus in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis without topical treatment: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mei Xiong, Qiaoli Gao, Hu Ren, Tingting Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2024.2432930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pruritus is the most prevalent and severe symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This network meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy of systemic targeted monotherapies in alleviating pruritus among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from phase 3/4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until 24 August 2024, focusing on targeted therapies for moderate-to-severe AD. The outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving <i>a</i> ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline on the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). This analysis included both primary endpoints (week 12 or week 16) and secondary endpoints (weeks 2, 4, and 8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven reports comprising 16 studies with 8,462 participants were included. At all time points examined, targeted therapies demonstrated statistically significant efficacy over placebo, with upadacitinib 30 mg showing the highest response rate. The next most effective treatments at the primary endpoint were abrocitinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, dupilumab 300 mg, and lebrikizumab 250 mg. Cumulative ranking probabilities at secondary endpoints varied based on time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted therapies, particularly upadacitinib 30 mg, showed significant advantages in managing moderate-to-severe AD pruritus. Further direct comparative trials are needed for conclusive evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"2432930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2432930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2432930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性瘙痒症是特应性皮炎(AD)最普遍、最严重的症状:慢性瘙痒是特应性皮炎(AD)最普遍、最严重的症状:本网络荟萃分析旨在评估系统性靶向单一疗法在缓解中重度特应性皮炎成人和青少年瘙痒症方面的疗效比较:数据收集自2024年8月24日前发表的3/4期随机对照试验(RCT),重点是治疗中重度AD的靶向疗法。结果测量指标为瘙痒数字评定量表(NRS)较基线改善≥4分的患者比例。该分析包括主要终点(第12周或第16周)和次要终点(第2周、第4周和第8周):结果:共纳入了 11 份报告,16 项研究,8462 名参与者。在所有考察的时间点上,靶向疗法的疗效在统计学上均显著优于安慰剂,其中乌达帕替尼 30 毫克的应答率最高。在主要终点上,疗效次之的疗法是阿罗西替尼 200 毫克、达帕替尼 15 毫克、达比鲁单抗 300 毫克和来布利珠单抗 250 毫克。次要终点的累积排名概率因时间点而异:结论:靶向疗法,尤其是高达替尼30毫克,在治疗中重度AD瘙痒症方面具有显著优势。要获得确凿证据,还需要进一步的直接比较试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for pruritus in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis without topical treatment: a network meta-analysis.

Background: Chronic pruritus is the most prevalent and severe symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD).

Objective: This network meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy of systemic targeted monotherapies in alleviating pruritus among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.

Methods: Data were collected from phase 3/4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until 24 August 2024, focusing on targeted therapies for moderate-to-severe AD. The outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline on the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). This analysis included both primary endpoints (week 12 or week 16) and secondary endpoints (weeks 2, 4, and 8).

Results: Eleven reports comprising 16 studies with 8,462 participants were included. At all time points examined, targeted therapies demonstrated statistically significant efficacy over placebo, with upadacitinib 30 mg showing the highest response rate. The next most effective treatments at the primary endpoint were abrocitinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, dupilumab 300 mg, and lebrikizumab 250 mg. Cumulative ranking probabilities at secondary endpoints varied based on time points.

Conclusion: Targeted therapies, particularly upadacitinib 30 mg, showed significant advantages in managing moderate-to-severe AD pruritus. Further direct comparative trials are needed for conclusive evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of sofpironium in treatment of primary hyperhidrosis: a systematic review. Efficacy and safety of 308-nm Excimer lamp combined with Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment as monotherapy in treating children with limited vitiligo: a randomized controlled trial. The wide variety of methotrexate dosing regimens for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Comparing Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision in the management of head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a scoping review. The primary role of sebum in the pathophysiology of acne vulgaris and its therapeutic relevance in acne management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1