吞咽困难的上呼吸道感觉测试-对临床实践和未来研究方向的影响。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Dysphagia Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1007/s00455-024-10789-w
Norita Regio, Ruby Hutton, Emma S Wallace
{"title":"吞咽困难的上呼吸道感觉测试-对临床实践和未来研究方向的影响。","authors":"Norita Regio, Ruby Hutton, Emma S Wallace","doi":"10.1007/s00455-024-10789-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adequate upper airway (oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal) sensation is crucial for safe and efficient swallowing and airway protection. Despite its importance, methods of upper airway sensory testing for individuals with dysphagia remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to summarise and appraise current methods of upper airway sensory testing to inform dysphagia clinical practice and future research directions. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that reported a method of upper airway sensory testing in individuals with dysphagia were included. Of the 1187 studies identified and screened, 54 met the inclusion criteria. Four types of upper airway sensory testing were reported: Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing with Sensory Testing (n = 31), Cough Reflex Testing (n = 22), Gag Reflex Testing (n = 5) and Gustatory (taste) Testing (n = 2). Indeterminate \"tests of sensory function\" (n = 2) were also reported. Variability in methods was evident across studies and reporting was insufficient for reliable replication. This review provides a comprehensive overview of methods of upper airway sensory testing in the dysphagia literature for dysphagia clinicians and researchers. The results indicate a need to develop a valid and reliable upper airway sensory testing protocol for individuals with dysphagia to improve assessment and targeted treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper Airway Sensory Testing in Dysphagia - Implications for Clinical Practice and Future Research Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Norita Regio, Ruby Hutton, Emma S Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00455-024-10789-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adequate upper airway (oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal) sensation is crucial for safe and efficient swallowing and airway protection. Despite its importance, methods of upper airway sensory testing for individuals with dysphagia remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to summarise and appraise current methods of upper airway sensory testing to inform dysphagia clinical practice and future research directions. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that reported a method of upper airway sensory testing in individuals with dysphagia were included. Of the 1187 studies identified and screened, 54 met the inclusion criteria. Four types of upper airway sensory testing were reported: Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing with Sensory Testing (n = 31), Cough Reflex Testing (n = 22), Gag Reflex Testing (n = 5) and Gustatory (taste) Testing (n = 2). Indeterminate \\\"tests of sensory function\\\" (n = 2) were also reported. Variability in methods was evident across studies and reporting was insufficient for reliable replication. This review provides a comprehensive overview of methods of upper airway sensory testing in the dysphagia literature for dysphagia clinicians and researchers. The results indicate a need to develop a valid and reliable upper airway sensory testing protocol for individuals with dysphagia to improve assessment and targeted treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dysphagia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dysphagia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-024-10789-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-024-10789-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

充足的上呼吸道(口腔、咽部和喉部)感觉对于安全有效的吞咽和气道保护至关重要。尽管它很重要,但对于吞咽困难患者的上呼吸道感觉测试方法仍然定义不清。本研究的目的是总结和评价现有的上呼吸道感觉检测方法,为吞咽困难的临床实践和未来的研究方向提供依据。采用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。研究报告了一种方法的上呼吸道感觉测试的个体吞咽困难包括在内。在确定和筛选的1187项研究中,54项符合纳入标准。报告了四种上呼吸道感觉测试:软性内镜下吞咽评估及感觉测试(n = 31)、咳嗽反射测试(n = 22)、呕吐反射测试(n = 5)和味觉测试(n = 2)。不确定的“感觉功能测试”(n = 2)也有报道。研究方法的可变性很明显,报告不足以可靠地复制。这篇综述为吞咽困难临床医生和研究人员提供了吞咽困难文献中上呼吸道感觉测试方法的全面概述。结果表明,需要为吞咽困难患者制定有效可靠的上呼吸道感觉测试方案,以改进评估和有针对性的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Upper Airway Sensory Testing in Dysphagia - Implications for Clinical Practice and Future Research Directions.

Adequate upper airway (oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal) sensation is crucial for safe and efficient swallowing and airway protection. Despite its importance, methods of upper airway sensory testing for individuals with dysphagia remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to summarise and appraise current methods of upper airway sensory testing to inform dysphagia clinical practice and future research directions. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that reported a method of upper airway sensory testing in individuals with dysphagia were included. Of the 1187 studies identified and screened, 54 met the inclusion criteria. Four types of upper airway sensory testing were reported: Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing with Sensory Testing (n = 31), Cough Reflex Testing (n = 22), Gag Reflex Testing (n = 5) and Gustatory (taste) Testing (n = 2). Indeterminate "tests of sensory function" (n = 2) were also reported. Variability in methods was evident across studies and reporting was insufficient for reliable replication. This review provides a comprehensive overview of methods of upper airway sensory testing in the dysphagia literature for dysphagia clinicians and researchers. The results indicate a need to develop a valid and reliable upper airway sensory testing protocol for individuals with dysphagia to improve assessment and targeted treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Evidence for Intermittent Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. A Tool for the Assessment of Swallowing Safety and Efficiency in Adults: Turkish Adaptation of Boston Residue and Clearance Scale. Validity and Reliability of the Swedish Version of the Gugging Swallowing Screen for use in Acute Stroke Care. Dysphagia in Head and Neck Radiotherapy: The Influence of Pharyngeal Constrictor Anatomy and Dosimetry. Effects of Thickening Agents on the Mucociliary Transport Function: Comparison by the Type of Thickening Agents and the Viscosity of Thickened Water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1