{"title":"妇科癌症患者财务毒性和健康相关生活质量的前瞻性变化","authors":"Kazunori Honda, Yusuke Kajimoto, Shiro Suzuki, Masahiko Mori, Kohshiro Nakao, Anri Azuma, Takashi Shibutani, Shoji Nagao, Takahiro Koyanagi, Izumi Kohara, Shuko Tamaki, Midori Yabuki, Lida Teng, Ataru Igarashi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02668-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Financial toxicity impacts the treatment choices, daily life, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. We investigated future variations in financial toxicity and HRQoL of patients with gynecologic cancer, evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study enrolled patients with gynecologic cancer incurring co-payments for anti-cancer drug treatment for over 2 months. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Patients completed the COST, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-OV28, EORTC-QLQ-CX24, EORTC-QLQ-EN24, and EQ-5D-5L. Paired t-tests were used to compare the initial and follow-up responses. Spearman's rank test was used to examine correlations between COST and HRQoL scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one patients (ovarian, 40; cervical, 18; endometrial, 33) completed the questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. The mean COST score was not significantly different between baseline and end of follow-up (19.56 ± 6.63 and 19.97 ± 7.47, respectively; p = 0.439). Significant correlations were found between COST scores and emotional functioning (r = 0.251, p = 0.023), cognitive functioning (r = 0.254, p = 0.020), and financial difficulties (r = - 0.298, p = 0.006), attitude toward disease/treatment (r = 0.356, p = 0.033), poor body image (r = - 0.362, p = 0.042), back and pelvis pain (r = - 0.451, p = 0.010), and taste change (r = - 0.359, p = 0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During anticancer drug therapy for gynecologic cancer, the COST score remained stable and did not correlate with overall HRQoL, although higher scores were associated with worse HRQoL for specific functions and symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective changes in financial toxicity and health-related quality of life in patients with gynecologic cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Kazunori Honda, Yusuke Kajimoto, Shiro Suzuki, Masahiko Mori, Kohshiro Nakao, Anri Azuma, Takashi Shibutani, Shoji Nagao, Takahiro Koyanagi, Izumi Kohara, Shuko Tamaki, Midori Yabuki, Lida Teng, Ataru Igarashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-024-02668-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Financial toxicity impacts the treatment choices, daily life, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. We investigated future variations in financial toxicity and HRQoL of patients with gynecologic cancer, evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study enrolled patients with gynecologic cancer incurring co-payments for anti-cancer drug treatment for over 2 months. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Patients completed the COST, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-OV28, EORTC-QLQ-CX24, EORTC-QLQ-EN24, and EQ-5D-5L. Paired t-tests were used to compare the initial and follow-up responses. Spearman's rank test was used to examine correlations between COST and HRQoL scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one patients (ovarian, 40; cervical, 18; endometrial, 33) completed the questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. The mean COST score was not significantly different between baseline and end of follow-up (19.56 ± 6.63 and 19.97 ± 7.47, respectively; p = 0.439). Significant correlations were found between COST scores and emotional functioning (r = 0.251, p = 0.023), cognitive functioning (r = 0.254, p = 0.020), and financial difficulties (r = - 0.298, p = 0.006), attitude toward disease/treatment (r = 0.356, p = 0.033), poor body image (r = - 0.362, p = 0.042), back and pelvis pain (r = - 0.451, p = 0.010), and taste change (r = - 0.359, p = 0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During anticancer drug therapy for gynecologic cancer, the COST score remained stable and did not correlate with overall HRQoL, although higher scores were associated with worse HRQoL for specific functions and symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02668-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02668-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:财务毒性影响癌症患者的治疗选择、日常生活和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。我们研究了妇科癌症患者财务毒性和HRQoL的未来变化,使用财务毒性综合评分(COST)问卷进行评估。方法:本多中心研究纳入了自费抗癌药物治疗2个月以上的妇科癌症患者。在基线和随访结束时进行问卷调查。患者完成了COST、EORTC-QLQ-C30、EORTC-QLQ-OV28、EORTC-QLQ-CX24、EORTC-QLQ-EN24和EQ-5D-5L。配对t检验用于比较初始和随访反应。采用Spearman等级检验检验COST与HRQoL评分之间的相关性。结果:91例患者(卵巢40例;颈,18;子宫内膜,33)完成基线和随访问卷。平均COST评分在基线和随访结束时差异无统计学意义(分别为19.56±6.63和19.97±7.47);p = 0.439)。成本评分与情绪功能(r = 0.251, p = 0.023)、认知功能(r = 0.254, p = 0.020)、经济困难(r = - 0.298, p = 0.006)、对疾病/治疗的态度(r = 0.356, p = 0.033)、身体形象不佳(r = - 0.362, p = 0.042)、背部和骨盆疼痛(r = - 0.451, p = 0.010)、味觉变化(r = - 0.359, p = 0.040)之间存在显著相关性。结论:在妇科肿瘤抗癌药物治疗期间,COST评分保持稳定,与总体HRQoL无相关性,但较高的评分与特定功能和症状的HRQoL较差相关。
Prospective changes in financial toxicity and health-related quality of life in patients with gynecologic cancer.
Background: Financial toxicity impacts the treatment choices, daily life, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. We investigated future variations in financial toxicity and HRQoL of patients with gynecologic cancer, evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire.
Methods: This multicenter study enrolled patients with gynecologic cancer incurring co-payments for anti-cancer drug treatment for over 2 months. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Patients completed the COST, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-OV28, EORTC-QLQ-CX24, EORTC-QLQ-EN24, and EQ-5D-5L. Paired t-tests were used to compare the initial and follow-up responses. Spearman's rank test was used to examine correlations between COST and HRQoL scores.
Results: Ninety-one patients (ovarian, 40; cervical, 18; endometrial, 33) completed the questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. The mean COST score was not significantly different between baseline and end of follow-up (19.56 ± 6.63 and 19.97 ± 7.47, respectively; p = 0.439). Significant correlations were found between COST scores and emotional functioning (r = 0.251, p = 0.023), cognitive functioning (r = 0.254, p = 0.020), and financial difficulties (r = - 0.298, p = 0.006), attitude toward disease/treatment (r = 0.356, p = 0.033), poor body image (r = - 0.362, p = 0.042), back and pelvis pain (r = - 0.451, p = 0.010), and taste change (r = - 0.359, p = 0.040).
Conclusions: During anticancer drug therapy for gynecologic cancer, the COST score remained stable and did not correlate with overall HRQoL, although higher scores were associated with worse HRQoL for specific functions and symptoms.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.