lelli试验诊断急性前交叉韧带损伤的有效性及其与其他常规临床检查的比较。

Muhammad Usama, Mubashar Ahmed Bajwa, Muhammad Umer Faheem, Sara Amin, Muhammad Naveed, Shaheryar Ahmad Khan, Ayesha Sohail
{"title":"lelli试验诊断急性前交叉韧带损伤的有效性及其与其他常规临床检查的比较。","authors":"Muhammad Usama, Mubashar Ahmed Bajwa, Muhammad Umer Faheem, Sara Amin, Muhammad Naveed, Shaheryar Ahmad Khan, Ayesha Sohail","doi":"10.55519/JAMC-03-13363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a vital structure in the knee responsible for preventing anterior translation; and countering rotational and valgus stress. The anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL, which are distinguished by their attachments at the tibia and femur, respectively, make up the ACL. The study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic parameters of lever sign in acute settings when compared against MRI as investigation of choice and compare them with the conventional tests. Furthermore, effect of examination-under-anaesthesia and training level of the examiner on the diagnostic accuracy will be assessed. It was a prospective observational was performed. All the patients that presented to out-patient department of GTTH, Lahore from January to July 2023 and had a final diagnosis of ACL tear were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Assessment was done by both undergraduates and postgraduates and those who underwent arthroscopy were placed in surgical cohort and arthroscopic findings were included in final analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eightythree patients were assessed. Inferential analysis demonstrated that Lelli's test had highest sensitivity (85.9%), NPV (64%) and diagnostic accuracy (85.5%). However, Lachman was most specific (94.7%) and had highest PPV (98.1). MRI itself is highly accurate (95.83%) when compared to arthroscopic findings. Though the results of each test when performed by postgraduates and under anaesthesia were significantly better; however, least difference was noted in case of Lelli test among awake and anesthetized and pre- and post-graduates' exams.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Lelli's test is highly sensitive and accurate when compared to the three conventional tests for ACL injuries. Furthermore, the manoeuvre and its interpretation are simple and reproducible; thus, can be used by highly trained healthcare professionals on awake patients with minimal discomfort. However, further research is needed to validate its biomechanics and role in partial ACL and multi-ligamentous injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":517395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","volume":"36 3","pages":"551-555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VALIDITY OF LELLI'S TEST IN DIAGNOSING ACUTE ACL INJURY AND ITS COMPARISON WITH THE OTHER CONVENTIONAL CLINICAL EXAMS.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Usama, Mubashar Ahmed Bajwa, Muhammad Umer Faheem, Sara Amin, Muhammad Naveed, Shaheryar Ahmad Khan, Ayesha Sohail\",\"doi\":\"10.55519/JAMC-03-13363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a vital structure in the knee responsible for preventing anterior translation; and countering rotational and valgus stress. The anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL, which are distinguished by their attachments at the tibia and femur, respectively, make up the ACL. The study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic parameters of lever sign in acute settings when compared against MRI as investigation of choice and compare them with the conventional tests. Furthermore, effect of examination-under-anaesthesia and training level of the examiner on the diagnostic accuracy will be assessed. It was a prospective observational was performed. All the patients that presented to out-patient department of GTTH, Lahore from January to July 2023 and had a final diagnosis of ACL tear were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Assessment was done by both undergraduates and postgraduates and those who underwent arthroscopy were placed in surgical cohort and arthroscopic findings were included in final analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eightythree patients were assessed. Inferential analysis demonstrated that Lelli's test had highest sensitivity (85.9%), NPV (64%) and diagnostic accuracy (85.5%). However, Lachman was most specific (94.7%) and had highest PPV (98.1). MRI itself is highly accurate (95.83%) when compared to arthroscopic findings. Though the results of each test when performed by postgraduates and under anaesthesia were significantly better; however, least difference was noted in case of Lelli test among awake and anesthetized and pre- and post-graduates' exams.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Lelli's test is highly sensitive and accurate when compared to the three conventional tests for ACL injuries. Furthermore, the manoeuvre and its interpretation are simple and reproducible; thus, can be used by highly trained healthcare professionals on awake patients with minimal discomfort. However, further research is needed to validate its biomechanics and role in partial ACL and multi-ligamentous injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":517395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"551-555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-13363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-13363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)是膝关节的重要结构,负责防止前平移;并抵消旋转和外翻应力。前内侧束和后外侧束组成前韧带,它们分别附着在胫骨和股骨上。本研究的目的是评估杠杆征的诊断参数在急性设置时,与MRI作为选择的调查,并将其与常规测试进行比较。此外,将评估麻醉下检查和审查员培训水平对诊断准确性的影响。这是一项前瞻性观察。纳入所有于2023年1月至7月在拉合尔GTTH门诊就诊并最终诊断为ACL撕裂的患者。方法:对本科生和研究生进行评估,将接受关节镜检查的患者纳入手术队列,并将关节镜检查结果纳入最终分析。结果:对83例患者进行了评估。推断分析表明,Lelli试验具有最高的敏感性(85.9%)、NPV(64%)和诊断准确率(85.5%)。然而,Lachman最特异(94.7%),PPV最高(98.1)。与关节镜检查结果相比,MRI本身具有很高的准确性(95.83%)。虽然研究生在麻醉状态下进行各项测试的结果明显更好;而清醒状态和麻醉状态下的Lelli测试,以及预科和研究生的Lelli测试差异最小。结论:与前交叉韧带损伤的三种常规检测方法相比,Lelli试验具有较高的灵敏度和准确性。此外,该操作及其解释简单,可重复;因此,可以由训练有素的医疗保健专业人员对清醒的病人使用最小的不适。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证其在部分前交叉韧带和多韧带损伤中的生物力学和作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VALIDITY OF LELLI'S TEST IN DIAGNOSING ACUTE ACL INJURY AND ITS COMPARISON WITH THE OTHER CONVENTIONAL CLINICAL EXAMS.

Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a vital structure in the knee responsible for preventing anterior translation; and countering rotational and valgus stress. The anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL, which are distinguished by their attachments at the tibia and femur, respectively, make up the ACL. The study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic parameters of lever sign in acute settings when compared against MRI as investigation of choice and compare them with the conventional tests. Furthermore, effect of examination-under-anaesthesia and training level of the examiner on the diagnostic accuracy will be assessed. It was a prospective observational was performed. All the patients that presented to out-patient department of GTTH, Lahore from January to July 2023 and had a final diagnosis of ACL tear were included.

Methods: Assessment was done by both undergraduates and postgraduates and those who underwent arthroscopy were placed in surgical cohort and arthroscopic findings were included in final analysis.

Results: Eightythree patients were assessed. Inferential analysis demonstrated that Lelli's test had highest sensitivity (85.9%), NPV (64%) and diagnostic accuracy (85.5%). However, Lachman was most specific (94.7%) and had highest PPV (98.1). MRI itself is highly accurate (95.83%) when compared to arthroscopic findings. Though the results of each test when performed by postgraduates and under anaesthesia were significantly better; however, least difference was noted in case of Lelli test among awake and anesthetized and pre- and post-graduates' exams.

Conclusions: The Lelli's test is highly sensitive and accurate when compared to the three conventional tests for ACL injuries. Furthermore, the manoeuvre and its interpretation are simple and reproducible; thus, can be used by highly trained healthcare professionals on awake patients with minimal discomfort. However, further research is needed to validate its biomechanics and role in partial ACL and multi-ligamentous injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PREVALENCE AND PATTERN OF INJURY IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES PRESENTED AT KHYBER MEDICAL COLLEGE PESHAWAR. PREOPERATIVE DENOSUMAB AND FEASIBILITY OF LESS MORBID SURGERY IN CAMPANACCI STAGE 3 GIANT CELL TUMOUR OF BONE. ADENOMYOEPITHELIOMA WITH CARCINOMA; EPITHELIAL-MYOEPITHELIAL CARCINOMA WITH EARLY PULMONARY METASTASIS. ASSESSMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF RECTUS SHEATH BLOCK IN GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY. ASSOCIATION OF CONSANGUINITY WITH RECURRENT FOETAL LOSS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1