实施多学科专家团队方法减少智障护理中的非自愿护理:多方法适应性和有效性评估研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1177/17446295241307061
Esther Bisschops, Lianne Bakkum, J Clasien de Schipper, Britt Metselaar, Simone van der Plas, Petri Embregts, Carlo Schuengel
{"title":"实施多学科专家团队方法减少智障护理中的非自愿护理:多方法适应性和有效性评估研究。","authors":"Esther Bisschops, Lianne Bakkum, J Clasien de Schipper, Britt Metselaar, Simone van der Plas, Petri Embregts, Carlo Schuengel","doi":"10.1177/17446295241307061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Involuntary care in intellectual disability care may be reduced by deployment of multidisciplinary consultation. The Multi-Disciplinary Expertise Team (MDET) method proved effective in a previous trial on increasing involuntary care reduction. The current study aimed to examine how four organizations adapted MDET during implementation, and tested whether these versions were also effective. Semi-structured interviews with MDET-coordinators were analyzed using the Framework Reporting Adaptions and Modifications-Expanded. A quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design tested change in weekly counts of involuntary care recordings from before to during MDET implementation, in care homes that implemented MDET (<i>n</i> = 24) compared to care homes providing care-as-usual (CAU). Adaptations to MDET varied. These included implementing MDET without an independent MDET-team and loosening recordings of involuntary care. No differential changes in recordings were found between the implementation- and CAU-groups. Scaling-out MDET to other organizations led to adaptations that may have undermined its effects on reducing involuntary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295241307061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing the Multi-Disciplinary Expertise Team method to reduce involuntary care in intellectual disability care: multi-methods study evaluating adaptation and effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Esther Bisschops, Lianne Bakkum, J Clasien de Schipper, Britt Metselaar, Simone van der Plas, Petri Embregts, Carlo Schuengel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17446295241307061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Involuntary care in intellectual disability care may be reduced by deployment of multidisciplinary consultation. The Multi-Disciplinary Expertise Team (MDET) method proved effective in a previous trial on increasing involuntary care reduction. The current study aimed to examine how four organizations adapted MDET during implementation, and tested whether these versions were also effective. Semi-structured interviews with MDET-coordinators were analyzed using the Framework Reporting Adaptions and Modifications-Expanded. A quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design tested change in weekly counts of involuntary care recordings from before to during MDET implementation, in care homes that implemented MDET (<i>n</i> = 24) compared to care homes providing care-as-usual (CAU). Adaptations to MDET varied. These included implementing MDET without an independent MDET-team and loosening recordings of involuntary care. No differential changes in recordings were found between the implementation- and CAU-groups. Scaling-out MDET to other organizations led to adaptations that may have undermined its effects on reducing involuntary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17446295241307061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241307061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241307061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过多学科咨询的部署,可以减少智力残疾护理中的非自愿护理。多学科专家小组(MDET)方法在之前的试验中证明是有效的,可以增加非自愿护理的减少。目前的研究旨在检查四个组织在实施过程中如何适应MDET,并测试这些版本是否有效。对mdet协调员的半结构化访谈使用框架报告改编和修改-扩展进行分析。准实验中断时间序列设计测试了在实施MDET的养老院(n = 24)与提供照护的养老院(CAU)相比,在实施MDET之前和实施MDET期间,每周非自愿护理记录计数的变化。对MDET的适应各不相同。这些措施包括在没有独立MDET团队的情况下实施MDET,以及放松对非自愿护理的记录。在实施组和cac组之间没有发现记录的差异变化。将MDET推广到其他组织导致了可能削弱其减少非自愿护理效果的适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementing the Multi-Disciplinary Expertise Team method to reduce involuntary care in intellectual disability care: multi-methods study evaluating adaptation and effectiveness.

Involuntary care in intellectual disability care may be reduced by deployment of multidisciplinary consultation. The Multi-Disciplinary Expertise Team (MDET) method proved effective in a previous trial on increasing involuntary care reduction. The current study aimed to examine how four organizations adapted MDET during implementation, and tested whether these versions were also effective. Semi-structured interviews with MDET-coordinators were analyzed using the Framework Reporting Adaptions and Modifications-Expanded. A quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design tested change in weekly counts of involuntary care recordings from before to during MDET implementation, in care homes that implemented MDET (n = 24) compared to care homes providing care-as-usual (CAU). Adaptations to MDET varied. These included implementing MDET without an independent MDET-team and loosening recordings of involuntary care. No differential changes in recordings were found between the implementation- and CAU-groups. Scaling-out MDET to other organizations led to adaptations that may have undermined its effects on reducing involuntary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
期刊最新文献
The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on UK social workers working with people with learning disabilities: A mixed methods study. Population-based cancer screening access needs of disabled people: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Changing practices, procedures, and perceptions: A multi-year person-centered planning initiative in group homes for residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Protocol for optimizing robot-assisted autism therapy sessions through gaze analysis: A pilot study investigating optimal trial count for children with comorbid autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Inclusive universities for students with intellectual disabilities from a teacher's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1