如何在地心说系统中使用开普勒第一和第二定律？问问G.B.里乔利吧

IF 0.7 2区哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Archive for History of Exact Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1007/s00407-024-00343-3

Flavia Marcacci, Paolo Bussotti

{"title":"如何在地心说系统中使用开普勒第一和第二定律？问问G.B.里乔利吧","authors":"Flavia Marcacci, Paolo Bussotti","doi":"10.1007/s00407-024-00343-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Kepler’s laws provided sufficient geometry and kinematics to strengthen astronomers’ preference for heliocentrism. While Kepler outlined some dynamic arguments, they were not rigorous enough to turn his laws into kinematic tools. As a result, some astronomers found ways to reconcile Kepler’s findings with geo-heliocentrism. One of these was the Jesuit astronomer Giovanni Battista Riccioli, who proposed a method known as the “epic-epicycle” (Riccioli, <i>Almagestum novum</i>, 1651). This paper will explore how Riccioli received and interpreted Kepler’s first and second laws within his own astronomical framework. This analysis will include a discussion of how Riccioli understood the concept of “physics” in his work, beginning with a study of the Sun’s motion (Riccioli, <i>Astronomia reformata</i>, 1665).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50982,"journal":{"name":"Archive for History of Exact Sciences","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00407-024-00343-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to use Kepler’s first and second laws in a geo-heliocentric system? Ask G.B. Riccioli\",\"authors\":\"Flavia Marcacci, Paolo Bussotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00407-024-00343-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Kepler’s laws provided sufficient geometry and kinematics to strengthen astronomers’ preference for heliocentrism. While Kepler outlined some dynamic arguments, they were not rigorous enough to turn his laws into kinematic tools. As a result, some astronomers found ways to reconcile Kepler’s findings with geo-heliocentrism. One of these was the Jesuit astronomer Giovanni Battista Riccioli, who proposed a method known as the “epic-epicycle” (Riccioli, <i>Almagestum novum</i>, 1651). This paper will explore how Riccioli received and interpreted Kepler’s first and second laws within his own astronomical framework. This analysis will include a discussion of how Riccioli understood the concept of “physics” in his work, beginning with a study of the Sun’s motion (Riccioli, <i>Astronomia reformata</i>, 1665).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archive for History of Exact Sciences\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00407-024-00343-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archive for History of Exact Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00407-024-00343-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for History of Exact Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00407-024-00343-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

开普勒定律提供了足够的几何学和运动学来加强天文学家对日心说的偏爱。虽然开普勒概述了一些动力学论证，但它们还不够严谨，不足以将他的定律转化为运动学工具。因此，一些天文学家找到了将开普勒的发现与地球日心说相一致的方法。其中一位是耶稣会天文学家乔瓦尼·巴蒂斯塔·里乔利，他提出了一种被称为“史诗-本轮”的方法（里乔利，Almagestum novum, 1651）。本文将探讨里乔利如何在他自己的天文学框架内接受和解释开普勒第一和第二定律。这一分析将包括讨论里乔利在他的作品中是如何理解“物理学”概念的，首先是对太阳运动的研究（里乔利，《天文改革》，1665）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

How to use Kepler’s first and second laws in a geo-heliocentric system? Ask G.B. Riccioli

Kepler’s laws provided sufficient geometry and kinematics to strengthen astronomers’ preference for heliocentrism. While Kepler outlined some dynamic arguments, they were not rigorous enough to turn his laws into kinematic tools. As a result, some astronomers found ways to reconcile Kepler’s findings with geo-heliocentrism. One of these was the Jesuit astronomer Giovanni Battista Riccioli, who proposed a method known as the “epic-epicycle” (Riccioli, Almagestum novum, 1651). This paper will explore how Riccioli received and interpreted Kepler’s first and second laws within his own astronomical framework. This analysis will include a discussion of how Riccioli understood the concept of “physics” in his work, beginning with a study of the Sun’s motion (Riccioli, Astronomia reformata, 1665).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Archive for History of Exact Sciences 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Archive for History of Exact Sciences casts light upon the conceptual groundwork of the sciences by analyzing the historical course of rigorous quantitative thought and the precise theory of nature in the fields of mathematics, physics, technical chemistry, computer science, astronomy, and the biological sciences, embracing as well their connections to experiment. This journal nourishes historical research meeting the standards of the mathematical sciences. Its aim is to give rapid and full publication to writings of exceptional depth, scope, and permanence.