Andrea Wolf, Billy W Loo, Raymond H Mak, Michael Liptay, Brian Pettiford, Gaetano Rocco, Michael Lanuti, Robert E Merritt, Homa Keshavarz, Robert D Suh, Alessandro Brunelli, Gerard J Criner, Peter J Mazzone, Garrett Walsh, Q Eileen Wafford, Sudish Murthy, M Blair Marshall, Betty Tong, James Luketich, Matthew J Schuchert, Thomas K Varghese, Thomas A D'Amico, Scott J Swanson, Arjun Pennathur
{"title":"立体定向消融放疗 (SABR)/ 立体定向体放射治疗 (SBRT) 用于治疗高风险 I 期非小细胞肺癌患者的系统性综述》(Systematic Review of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)/ Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT))。","authors":"Andrea Wolf, Billy W Loo, Raymond H Mak, Michael Liptay, Brian Pettiford, Gaetano Rocco, Michael Lanuti, Robert E Merritt, Homa Keshavarz, Robert D Suh, Alessandro Brunelli, Gerard J Criner, Peter J Mazzone, Garrett Walsh, Q Eileen Wafford, Sudish Murthy, M Blair Marshall, Betty Tong, James Luketich, Matthew J Schuchert, Thomas K Varghese, Thomas A D'Amico, Scott J Swanson, Arjun Pennathur","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an alternative, non-surgical treatment for high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with increased use over time. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) assembled an expert panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature evaluating the results of SABR, which is also referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), prior to developing treatment recommendations for high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC based on expert consensus. Publications detailing the findings of 16 prospective studies of SABR and 14 retrospective studies of SABR for the management of early-stage lung cancer in 54 697 patients were identified by systematic review of the literature with further review by members of our expert panel. Medical inoperability (93-95%) was the primary reason for utilizing SABR. The median rate of histologically confirmed cancer in treated patients was 67% (range 57-86%). In retrospective studies and prospective studies, the most common dosing regimens were 48-54 Gy in 3-5 fractions and 44-66 Gy in 3-5 fractions respectively. The median follow-up after SABR was 30 months (range 15-50). The complications, oncological results and quality of life after SABR in high-risk patients with early-stage NSCLC are summarized in this Expert Review article. Further prospective randomized trials are needed and are currently underway to compare outcomes after SABR with outcomes after sublobar resection to fully evaluate treatment options applicable this high-risk group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)/ Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Wolf, Billy W Loo, Raymond H Mak, Michael Liptay, Brian Pettiford, Gaetano Rocco, Michael Lanuti, Robert E Merritt, Homa Keshavarz, Robert D Suh, Alessandro Brunelli, Gerard J Criner, Peter J Mazzone, Garrett Walsh, Q Eileen Wafford, Sudish Murthy, M Blair Marshall, Betty Tong, James Luketich, Matthew J Schuchert, Thomas K Varghese, Thomas A D'Amico, Scott J Swanson, Arjun Pennathur\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an alternative, non-surgical treatment for high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with increased use over time. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) assembled an expert panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature evaluating the results of SABR, which is also referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), prior to developing treatment recommendations for high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC based on expert consensus. Publications detailing the findings of 16 prospective studies of SABR and 14 retrospective studies of SABR for the management of early-stage lung cancer in 54 697 patients were identified by systematic review of the literature with further review by members of our expert panel. Medical inoperability (93-95%) was the primary reason for utilizing SABR. The median rate of histologically confirmed cancer in treated patients was 67% (range 57-86%). In retrospective studies and prospective studies, the most common dosing regimens were 48-54 Gy in 3-5 fractions and 44-66 Gy in 3-5 fractions respectively. The median follow-up after SABR was 30 months (range 15-50). The complications, oncological results and quality of life after SABR in high-risk patients with early-stage NSCLC are summarized in this Expert Review article. Further prospective randomized trials are needed and are currently underway to compare outcomes after SABR with outcomes after sublobar resection to fully evaluate treatment options applicable this high-risk group of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.10.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.10.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着时间的推移,立体定向消融放射治疗(SABR)已成为高风险 I 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的一种替代性非手术疗法。美国胸外科协会(AATS)临床实践标准委员会(CPSC)组建了一个专家小组,对评估 SABR(也称为立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)或立体定向放射外科(SRS))效果的文献进行了系统性回顾,然后根据专家共识为 I 期 NSCLC 高危患者制定了治疗建议。通过对文献进行系统性审查,并由我们的专家组成员进行进一步审查,我们确定了16篇关于SABR治疗早期肺癌的前瞻性研究和14篇关于SABR治疗早期肺癌的回顾性研究的文献,共54 697名患者接受了SABR治疗。医学上无法手术(93%-95%)是使用 SABR 的主要原因。在接受治疗的患者中,组织学确诊癌症的中位比例为 67%(范围为 57-86%)。在回顾性研究和前瞻性研究中,最常见的给药方案分别是 48-54 Gy,3-5 次分次给药和 44-66 Gy,3-5 次分次给药。SABR术后的中位随访时间为30个月(15-50个月)。本专家评论文章总结了早期NSCLC高危患者SABR术后的并发症、肿瘤治疗效果和生活质量。目前正在进行更多前瞻性随机试验,以比较SABR术后与球下切除术后的疗效,从而全面评估适用于这一高风险患者群体的治疗方案。
Systematic Review of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)/ Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an alternative, non-surgical treatment for high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with increased use over time. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) assembled an expert panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature evaluating the results of SABR, which is also referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), prior to developing treatment recommendations for high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC based on expert consensus. Publications detailing the findings of 16 prospective studies of SABR and 14 retrospective studies of SABR for the management of early-stage lung cancer in 54 697 patients were identified by systematic review of the literature with further review by members of our expert panel. Medical inoperability (93-95%) was the primary reason for utilizing SABR. The median rate of histologically confirmed cancer in treated patients was 67% (range 57-86%). In retrospective studies and prospective studies, the most common dosing regimens were 48-54 Gy in 3-5 fractions and 44-66 Gy in 3-5 fractions respectively. The median follow-up after SABR was 30 months (range 15-50). The complications, oncological results and quality of life after SABR in high-risk patients with early-stage NSCLC are summarized in this Expert Review article. Further prospective randomized trials are needed and are currently underway to compare outcomes after SABR with outcomes after sublobar resection to fully evaluate treatment options applicable this high-risk group of patients.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.