T1W 和 T2W Dixon 序列能否取代标准磁共振成像方案诊断骶髂关节炎?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/jbsr.3658
Nur Betül Karatoprak, Zeynep Maraş Özdemir, Sinan Karatoprak, Ayşegül Sağır Kahraman, Leyla Karaca, Servet Yolbaş
{"title":"T1W 和 T2W Dixon 序列能否取代标准磁共振成像方案诊断骶髂关节炎?","authors":"Nur Betül Karatoprak, Zeynep Maraş Özdemir, Sinan Karatoprak, Ayşegül Sağır Kahraman, Leyla Karaca, Servet Yolbaş","doi":"10.5334/jbsr.3658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives:</i> This study aims to assess the performances of T1‑weighted (T1W) and T2‑weighted (T2W) Dixon sequences as replacements for the standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol for diagnosing active and chronic sacroiliitis. <i>Materials/Methods:</i> This single‑centre, prospective study included 107 patients who underwent 3 Tesla MRIs. The patients with inflammatory low‑back pain (aged 18-50 years) were included. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy, pelvic infection/malignancy history, pelvic metal implants or foreign body artefacts. The imaging protocol comprised standard T1W and T2W fat‑saturated (T2W‑FS) sequences and T1W-T2W Dixon sequences. Active sacroiliitis signs were assessed by comparing T2W‑FS images with T2W Dixon water‑only (WO) images. Chronic sacroiliitis signs were evaluated by comparing the standard T1W sequence with T1W-T2W Dixon fat‑only (FO), in‑phase (IP) and out‑of‑phase (OP) images. The quantitative analysis involved calculating signal‑to‑noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast‑to‑noise ratios (CNRs) for bone marrow edema (BME) and periarticular fat deposition (PFD). Descriptive statistics, correlation, diagnostic performance tests and interobserver reliability tests were performed in the qualitative analysis. <i>Results:</i> There were no statistically significant differences in BME detection between the T2W‑FS and T2W Dixon‑WO images. T2W Dixon exhibited significantly greater SNRs-CNRs than did the standard protocol for BME and periarticular fat deposition assessments. T1W-T2W Dixon imaging demonstrated sufficiently high diagnostic performance for detecting erosions, periarticular fat deposition and ankylosis compared with the standard protocol. <i>Conclusions:</i> The T2W Dixon sequence has the potential to replace the standard protocol, which would reduce acquisition time. However, we do not recommend the use of the T1W Dixon sequence in routine practice, since standard T1W images provide similar or superior results to T1W Dixon images.</p>","PeriodicalId":55987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology","volume":"108 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can T1W and T2W Dixon Sequences Replace the Standard MRI Protocol in Diagnosing Sacroiliitis?\",\"authors\":\"Nur Betül Karatoprak, Zeynep Maraş Özdemir, Sinan Karatoprak, Ayşegül Sağır Kahraman, Leyla Karaca, Servet Yolbaş\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/jbsr.3658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives:</i> This study aims to assess the performances of T1‑weighted (T1W) and T2‑weighted (T2W) Dixon sequences as replacements for the standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol for diagnosing active and chronic sacroiliitis. <i>Materials/Methods:</i> This single‑centre, prospective study included 107 patients who underwent 3 Tesla MRIs. The patients with inflammatory low‑back pain (aged 18-50 years) were included. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy, pelvic infection/malignancy history, pelvic metal implants or foreign body artefacts. The imaging protocol comprised standard T1W and T2W fat‑saturated (T2W‑FS) sequences and T1W-T2W Dixon sequences. Active sacroiliitis signs were assessed by comparing T2W‑FS images with T2W Dixon water‑only (WO) images. Chronic sacroiliitis signs were evaluated by comparing the standard T1W sequence with T1W-T2W Dixon fat‑only (FO), in‑phase (IP) and out‑of‑phase (OP) images. The quantitative analysis involved calculating signal‑to‑noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast‑to‑noise ratios (CNRs) for bone marrow edema (BME) and periarticular fat deposition (PFD). Descriptive statistics, correlation, diagnostic performance tests and interobserver reliability tests were performed in the qualitative analysis. <i>Results:</i> There were no statistically significant differences in BME detection between the T2W‑FS and T2W Dixon‑WO images. T2W Dixon exhibited significantly greater SNRs-CNRs than did the standard protocol for BME and periarticular fat deposition assessments. T1W-T2W Dixon imaging demonstrated sufficiently high diagnostic performance for detecting erosions, periarticular fat deposition and ankylosis compared with the standard protocol. <i>Conclusions:</i> The T2W Dixon sequence has the potential to replace the standard protocol, which would reduce acquisition time. However, we do not recommend the use of the T1W Dixon sequence in routine practice, since standard T1W images provide similar or superior results to T1W Dixon images.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.3658\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.3658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估 T1 加权(T1W)和 T2 加权(T2W)Dixon 序列在诊断活动性和慢性骶髂关节炎时替代标准磁共振成像(MRI)方案的性能。材料/方法:这项单中心前瞻性研究包括 107 名接受 3 特斯拉核磁共振成像检查的患者。研究对象包括患有炎症性腰背痛的患者(18-50 岁)。排除标准包括妊娠、盆腔感染/恶性肿瘤病史、盆腔金属植入物或异物伪影。成像方案包括标准T1W和T2W脂肪饱和(T2W-FS)序列以及T1W-T2W迪克森序列。通过比较T2W-FS图像和T2W Dixon纯水(WO)图像来评估活动性骶髂关节炎体征。慢性骶髂关节炎体征通过比较标准 T1W 序列与 T1W-T2W Dixon 纯脂肪(FO)、同相(IP)和非同相(OP)图像进行评估。定量分析包括计算骨髓水肿(BME)和关节周围脂肪沉积(PFD)的信噪比(SNR)和对比信噪比(CNR)。定性分析包括描述性统计、相关性、诊断性能测试和观察者间可靠性测试。结果:T2W-FS 和 T2W Dixon-WO 图像在 BME 检测方面没有明显的统计学差异。在 BME 和关节周围脂肪沉积评估方面,T2W Dixon 的信噪比-净信噪比明显高于标准方案。与标准方案相比,T1W-T2W Dixon 成像在检测糜烂、关节周围脂肪沉积和强直方面表现出足够高的诊断性能。结论T2W Dixon 序列有可能取代标准方案,从而缩短采集时间。不过,我们不建议在常规实践中使用 T1W Dixon 序列,因为标准 T1W 图像的结果与 T1W Dixon 图像相似或更优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can T1W and T2W Dixon Sequences Replace the Standard MRI Protocol in Diagnosing Sacroiliitis?

Objectives: This study aims to assess the performances of T1‑weighted (T1W) and T2‑weighted (T2W) Dixon sequences as replacements for the standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol for diagnosing active and chronic sacroiliitis. Materials/Methods: This single‑centre, prospective study included 107 patients who underwent 3 Tesla MRIs. The patients with inflammatory low‑back pain (aged 18-50 years) were included. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy, pelvic infection/malignancy history, pelvic metal implants or foreign body artefacts. The imaging protocol comprised standard T1W and T2W fat‑saturated (T2W‑FS) sequences and T1W-T2W Dixon sequences. Active sacroiliitis signs were assessed by comparing T2W‑FS images with T2W Dixon water‑only (WO) images. Chronic sacroiliitis signs were evaluated by comparing the standard T1W sequence with T1W-T2W Dixon fat‑only (FO), in‑phase (IP) and out‑of‑phase (OP) images. The quantitative analysis involved calculating signal‑to‑noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast‑to‑noise ratios (CNRs) for bone marrow edema (BME) and periarticular fat deposition (PFD). Descriptive statistics, correlation, diagnostic performance tests and interobserver reliability tests were performed in the qualitative analysis. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in BME detection between the T2W‑FS and T2W Dixon‑WO images. T2W Dixon exhibited significantly greater SNRs-CNRs than did the standard protocol for BME and periarticular fat deposition assessments. T1W-T2W Dixon imaging demonstrated sufficiently high diagnostic performance for detecting erosions, periarticular fat deposition and ankylosis compared with the standard protocol. Conclusions: The T2W Dixon sequence has the potential to replace the standard protocol, which would reduce acquisition time. However, we do not recommend the use of the T1W Dixon sequence in routine practice, since standard T1W images provide similar or superior results to T1W Dixon images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology is the publication of articles dealing with diagnostic and interventional radiology, related imaging techniques, allied sciences, and continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Cerebral Fat Macroembolism: Diagnosic Tools with Spectral Imaging. Polysplenia Syndrome and the Development of Heart Failure due to Associated Congenital Heart Defect. Can T1W and T2W Dixon Sequences Replace the Standard MRI Protocol in Diagnosing Sacroiliitis? Rhabdomyosarcoma of the Maxilla. Accessory Extraocular Muscle: A Rare Cause of Strabismus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1