心理治疗改变动机量表的开发与验证。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2024.2433622
Mingyu Hu, Ruilu Yang, Hua Yang, Chenchen Lin, Di Liu, Ning Zhang
{"title":"心理治疗改变动机量表的开发与验证。","authors":"Mingyu Hu, Ruilu Yang, Hua Yang, Chenchen Lin, Di Liu, Ning Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2433622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop a Psychotherapy Change Motivation Scale (PCMS) with robust psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review, semi-structured interviews, and expert evaluation were used to draft the scale. The scale was administered to participants receiving psychological counseling or therapy at specialized hospital psychological intervention centers, university mental health education centers, and social psychological counseling agencies using convenience sampling. The initial sample (<i>n</i> = 178) was subjected to item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, and the formal sample (<i>n</i> = 180) was then subjected to confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity testing. Criterion validity was tested using the Outcome Questionnaire-45(OQ-45) and the revised Chinese version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final scale comprised 19 items across four dimensions: Activation, Expected benefits, Agency, and Maintenance and Orientation. The Cronbach's α coefficients ranged from 0.608 to 0.897 for the total scale and subscales; split-half reliability was 0.796; cumulative explained variance was 58.363%, with good structural validity (X<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.69, RMSEA = 0.062, GFI = 0.875, CFI = 0.915, IFI = 0.917, TLI = 0.901). PCMS scores and its four factors were negatively correlated with OQ-45 (r = -0.234 to -0.375, <i>p</i><0.01) and positively correlated with the Chinese URICA (r = 0.386-0.694, <i>p</i><0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed PCMS demonstrates good reliability and validity, meeting psychometric standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a psychotherapy change motivation scale.\",\"authors\":\"Mingyu Hu, Ruilu Yang, Hua Yang, Chenchen Lin, Di Liu, Ning Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2024.2433622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop a Psychotherapy Change Motivation Scale (PCMS) with robust psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review, semi-structured interviews, and expert evaluation were used to draft the scale. The scale was administered to participants receiving psychological counseling or therapy at specialized hospital psychological intervention centers, university mental health education centers, and social psychological counseling agencies using convenience sampling. The initial sample (<i>n</i> = 178) was subjected to item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, and the formal sample (<i>n</i> = 180) was then subjected to confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity testing. Criterion validity was tested using the Outcome Questionnaire-45(OQ-45) and the revised Chinese version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final scale comprised 19 items across four dimensions: Activation, Expected benefits, Agency, and Maintenance and Orientation. The Cronbach's α coefficients ranged from 0.608 to 0.897 for the total scale and subscales; split-half reliability was 0.796; cumulative explained variance was 58.363%, with good structural validity (X<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.69, RMSEA = 0.062, GFI = 0.875, CFI = 0.915, IFI = 0.917, TLI = 0.901). PCMS scores and its four factors were negatively correlated with OQ-45 (r = -0.234 to -0.375, <i>p</i><0.01) and positively correlated with the Chinese URICA (r = 0.386-0.694, <i>p</i><0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed PCMS demonstrates good reliability and validity, meeting psychometric standards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2433622\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2433622","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:编制具有较强心理测量特性的心理治疗改变动机量表(PCMS)。方法:采用文献回顾法、半结构式访谈法和专家评价法编制量表。采用方便抽样的方法对在专科医院心理干预中心、高校心理健康教育中心和社会心理咨询机构接受心理咨询或治疗的被试进行问卷调查。对初始样本(n = 178)进行项目分析和探索性因子分析,对正式样本(n = 180)进行验证性因子分析和信效度检验。采用结果问卷-45(OQ-45)和罗德岛大学变化评估量表(URICA)的中文版进行效度测试。结果:最终量表包括激活、预期效益、代理和维持与导向四个维度的19个项目。总量表和子量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.608 ~ 0.897;分半信度为0.796;累积解释方差为58.363%,具有良好的结构效度(X2/df = 1.69, RMSEA = 0.062, GFI = 0.875, CFI = 0.915, IFI = 0.917, TLI = 0.901)。PCMS评分及其4个因子与OQ-45呈负相关(r = -0.234 ~ -0.375),结论:所编制的PCMS具有良好的信效度,符合心理测量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a psychotherapy change motivation scale.

Objective: Develop a Psychotherapy Change Motivation Scale (PCMS) with robust psychometric properties.

Method: A literature review, semi-structured interviews, and expert evaluation were used to draft the scale. The scale was administered to participants receiving psychological counseling or therapy at specialized hospital psychological intervention centers, university mental health education centers, and social psychological counseling agencies using convenience sampling. The initial sample (n = 178) was subjected to item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, and the formal sample (n = 180) was then subjected to confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity testing. Criterion validity was tested using the Outcome Questionnaire-45(OQ-45) and the revised Chinese version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA).

Results: The final scale comprised 19 items across four dimensions: Activation, Expected benefits, Agency, and Maintenance and Orientation. The Cronbach's α coefficients ranged from 0.608 to 0.897 for the total scale and subscales; split-half reliability was 0.796; cumulative explained variance was 58.363%, with good structural validity (X2/df = 1.69, RMSEA = 0.062, GFI = 0.875, CFI = 0.915, IFI = 0.917, TLI = 0.901). PCMS scores and its four factors were negatively correlated with OQ-45 (r = -0.234 to -0.375, p<0.01) and positively correlated with the Chinese URICA (r = 0.386-0.694, p<0.01).

Conclusion: The developed PCMS demonstrates good reliability and validity, meeting psychometric standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
"I know that all this is me" Pathways of change in complex dissociative disorder. Emotion cascade: Harnessing emotional sequences to enhance chair work interventions and reduce self-criticism. Personalization of structured group psychotherapy through add-on interventions: A potential for active engagement. Maintaining relevance in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A novel approach to discerning between effective vs. ineffective discourse correlated with better session outcomes. "Vulnerability can breed strength": The role of borderline personality disorder severity in movement synchrony among patients with major depressive disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1