EQ-HWB和EQ-HWB- s在乳腺癌患者中的心理测量特性:与EQ-5D-5L、FACT-8D和SWEMWBS的比较分析

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.003
Stevanus Pangestu MBA , Fredrick Dermawan Purba PhD , Hari Setyowibowo PhD , Yohana Azhar PhD , Clara Mukuria PhD , Fanni Rencz PhD
{"title":"EQ-HWB和EQ-HWB- s在乳腺癌患者中的心理测量特性:与EQ-5D-5L、FACT-8D和SWEMWBS的比较分析","authors":"Stevanus Pangestu MBA ,&nbsp;Fredrick Dermawan Purba PhD ,&nbsp;Hari Setyowibowo PhD ,&nbsp;Yohana Azhar PhD ,&nbsp;Clara Mukuria PhD ,&nbsp;Fanni Rencz PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) is a new generic measure that captures constructs beyond health-related quality of life, with a 25-item long form and a shorter 9-item version (EQ-HWB-S). This study aimed to assess the psychometric performance of both versions in breast cancer, which is the most prevalent cancer worldwide, and compare them with other instruments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A longitudinal survey in Indonesia (2023-2024) with 300 female patients used the EQ-HWB, 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (from which Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Eight Dimension [FACT-8D] was derived), and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS, from which the Short WEMWBS was derived). Distributional characteristics, convergent validity, known-group validity (Student’s <em>t</em> test or analysis of variance), test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients reported problems in at least 1 EQ-HWB item. The EQ-HWB-S index (11%) had a lower ceiling than the EQ-5D-5L (35%) and the Short WEMWBS (15.3%), but not the FACT-8D (5%). EQ-HWB-S index values correlated strongly with EQ-5D-5L (r = 0.73) and FACT-8D index values (r = 0.70), whereas EQ-HWB level sum scores correlated strongly with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (r = 0.69) and moderately with WEMWBS (r = 0.49). The EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S discriminated across known groups comparably with the EQ-5D-5L and FACT-8D with large effect sizes according to EuroQol visual analog scale groups, number of symptoms, and general health and exhibited excellent instrument-level test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations, 0.79-0.83) and acceptable responsiveness (standardized response means, |0.24| to |0.97|).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study represents one of the first validations of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S in any clinical population. Both instrument versions demonstrate robust psychometric performance. The EQ-HWB-S can be recommended to inform resource allocation decisions of breast cancer treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"28 3","pages":"Pages 449-459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Psychometric Properties of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis With EQ-5D-5L, FACT-8D, and SWEMWBS\",\"authors\":\"Stevanus Pangestu MBA ,&nbsp;Fredrick Dermawan Purba PhD ,&nbsp;Hari Setyowibowo PhD ,&nbsp;Yohana Azhar PhD ,&nbsp;Clara Mukuria PhD ,&nbsp;Fanni Rencz PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) is a new generic measure that captures constructs beyond health-related quality of life, with a 25-item long form and a shorter 9-item version (EQ-HWB-S). This study aimed to assess the psychometric performance of both versions in breast cancer, which is the most prevalent cancer worldwide, and compare them with other instruments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A longitudinal survey in Indonesia (2023-2024) with 300 female patients used the EQ-HWB, 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (from which Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Eight Dimension [FACT-8D] was derived), and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS, from which the Short WEMWBS was derived). Distributional characteristics, convergent validity, known-group validity (Student’s <em>t</em> test or analysis of variance), test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All patients reported problems in at least 1 EQ-HWB item. The EQ-HWB-S index (11%) had a lower ceiling than the EQ-5D-5L (35%) and the Short WEMWBS (15.3%), but not the FACT-8D (5%). EQ-HWB-S index values correlated strongly with EQ-5D-5L (r = 0.73) and FACT-8D index values (r = 0.70), whereas EQ-HWB level sum scores correlated strongly with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (r = 0.69) and moderately with WEMWBS (r = 0.49). The EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S discriminated across known groups comparably with the EQ-5D-5L and FACT-8D with large effect sizes according to EuroQol visual analog scale groups, number of symptoms, and general health and exhibited excellent instrument-level test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations, 0.79-0.83) and acceptable responsiveness (standardized response means, |0.24| to |0.97|).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study represents one of the first validations of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S in any clinical population. Both instrument versions demonstrate robust psychometric performance. The EQ-HWB-S can be recommended to inform resource allocation decisions of breast cancer treatments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 449-459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524067949\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524067949","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:情商健康与幸福是一种新的通用测量,它捕获了健康相关生活质量以外的结构,有一个25项的长表格(EQ- hwb)和一个较短的9项版本(EQ- hwb - s)。本研究旨在评估这两种版本在全球最常见的乳腺癌中的心理测量性能,并将其与其他工具进行比较。方法:在印度尼西亚(2023-24)对300名女性患者进行纵向调查,使用EQ-HWB, EQ-5D-5L,癌症治疗功能评估(FACT-G, FACT-8D来源于此),沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS, SWEMWBS来源于此)。评估了分布特征、收敛效度、已知组效度(学生t检验或方差分析)、重测信度和反应性。结果:所有患者都报告了至少一个EQ-HWB项目的问题。EQ-HWB-S指数(11%)的上限低于EQ-5D-5L(35%)和SWEMWBS(15.3%),但高于FACT-8D(5%)。EQ-HWB- s指标值与EQ-5D-5L指标值强相关(r=0.73), FACT-8D指标值强相关(r=0.70), EQ-HWB水平总分与FACT-G强相关(r=0.69),与WEMWBS中度相关(r=0.49)。EQ- hwb和EQ- hwb - s在已知组中的区别与EQ- 5d - 5l和事实- 8d相比,EQ- hwb - s根据EQ VAS分组、症状数量和一般健康状况具有较大的效应量,并且表现出优异的仪器水平测试-重测信度(类内相关性=0.79-0.83)和可接受的反应性(标准化反应均值=|0.24|至|0.97|)。结论:本研究代表了EQ-HWB和EQ-HWB- s在任何临床人群中的首次验证之一。两种仪器版本都显示出强大的心理测量性能。EQ-HWB-S可以推荐为乳腺癌治疗的资源分配决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Psychometric Properties of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis With EQ-5D-5L, FACT-8D, and SWEMWBS

Objectives

The EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) is a new generic measure that captures constructs beyond health-related quality of life, with a 25-item long form and a shorter 9-item version (EQ-HWB-S). This study aimed to assess the psychometric performance of both versions in breast cancer, which is the most prevalent cancer worldwide, and compare them with other instruments.

Methods

A longitudinal survey in Indonesia (2023-2024) with 300 female patients used the EQ-HWB, 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (from which Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Eight Dimension [FACT-8D] was derived), and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS, from which the Short WEMWBS was derived). Distributional characteristics, convergent validity, known-group validity (Student’s t test or analysis of variance), test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were assessed.

Results

All patients reported problems in at least 1 EQ-HWB item. The EQ-HWB-S index (11%) had a lower ceiling than the EQ-5D-5L (35%) and the Short WEMWBS (15.3%), but not the FACT-8D (5%). EQ-HWB-S index values correlated strongly with EQ-5D-5L (r = 0.73) and FACT-8D index values (r = 0.70), whereas EQ-HWB level sum scores correlated strongly with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (r = 0.69) and moderately with WEMWBS (r = 0.49). The EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S discriminated across known groups comparably with the EQ-5D-5L and FACT-8D with large effect sizes according to EuroQol visual analog scale groups, number of symptoms, and general health and exhibited excellent instrument-level test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations, 0.79-0.83) and acceptable responsiveness (standardized response means, |0.24| to |0.97|).

Conclusions

This study represents one of the first validations of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S in any clinical population. Both instrument versions demonstrate robust psychometric performance. The EQ-HWB-S can be recommended to inform resource allocation decisions of breast cancer treatments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Can adolescents value the EQ-5D-Y-5L and EQ-5D-5L, and how do the values compare? A feasibility study. Performance of the EQ-5D-5L with skin irritation and self-confidence bolt-on items in patients with urticaria. The Value of Positron Emission Tomography for Confirmation of Alzheimer's Disease in the Era of Amyloid-Targeting Therapies. Use of Real-World Evidence in Health Technology Reassessments Across Six Health Technology Assessment Agencies. A Comprehensive View of the Methods Used to Measure the Societal Impact of Healthcare Interventions: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1