制定并验证一份问卷,以测量护士对脑卒中偏瘫患者运动功能康复的感知知识、态度和实践。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING Asian Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.anr.2024.11.002
Yajie Shi, Shufang Shi, Jiangyan Ren, Bo Zeng, Li Yao, Zhiwei Tang, Wanling Li
{"title":"制定并验证一份问卷,以测量护士对脑卒中偏瘫患者运动功能康复的感知知识、态度和实践。","authors":"Yajie Shi, Shufang Shi, Jiangyan Ren, Bo Zeng, Li Yao, Zhiwei Tang, Wanling Li","doi":"10.1016/j.anr.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a questionnaire to measure nurses' perceived knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia (MFRSPH-PKAP-Q), and to evaluate its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in four phases: (1) creating a pool of potential items; (2) developing the preliminary scale using a Delphi survey; (3) conducting item reduction to refine the scale; and (4) testing the validity and reliability of the final scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire comprises 45 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a three-factor model, explaining 55.79% of the variance, which encompassed perceived knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) affirmed the suitability of this three-factor model for the data. Additionally, assessments of content validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity all yielded favorable results. The Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability of the entire questionnaire were .944, .911, and .921, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MFRSPH-PKAP-Q has been demonstrated to be both valid and reliable, and is therefore recommended for use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55450,"journal":{"name":"Asian Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure nurses' perceived knowledge, attitudes and practices related to motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia.\",\"authors\":\"Yajie Shi, Shufang Shi, Jiangyan Ren, Bo Zeng, Li Yao, Zhiwei Tang, Wanling Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anr.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a questionnaire to measure nurses' perceived knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia (MFRSPH-PKAP-Q), and to evaluate its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in four phases: (1) creating a pool of potential items; (2) developing the preliminary scale using a Delphi survey; (3) conducting item reduction to refine the scale; and (4) testing the validity and reliability of the final scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire comprises 45 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a three-factor model, explaining 55.79% of the variance, which encompassed perceived knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) affirmed the suitability of this three-factor model for the data. Additionally, assessments of content validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity all yielded favorable results. The Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability of the entire questionnaire were .944, .911, and .921, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MFRSPH-PKAP-Q has been demonstrated to be both valid and reliable, and is therefore recommended for use in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2024.11.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2024.11.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:编制护士对脑卒中偏瘫患者运动功能康复认知、态度和实践的问卷(MFRSPH-PKAP-Q),并对其信度和效度进行评估。方法:本研究分四个阶段进行:(1)建立潜在项目库;(2)采用德尔菲调查法编制初步量表;(三)进行项目缩减,细化量表;(4)对最终量表的效度和信度进行检验。结果:问卷共45个项目。探索性因子分析(EFA)揭示了一个三因素模型,解释了55.79%的方差,其中包括感知知识,态度和实践。验证性因子分析(CFA)证实了该三因素模型对数据的适用性。此外,内容效度、聚合效度和区别效度的评估都获得了良好的结果。整份问卷的Cronbach’s α系数、劈半信度和重测信度分别为0.944、0.911和0.921。结论:mfrsph - pcap - q已被证明是有效和可靠的,因此建议在临床实践中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure nurses' perceived knowledge, attitudes and practices related to motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia.

Purpose: To develop a questionnaire to measure nurses' perceived knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia (MFRSPH-PKAP-Q), and to evaluate its reliability and validity.

Methods: This study was conducted in four phases: (1) creating a pool of potential items; (2) developing the preliminary scale using a Delphi survey; (3) conducting item reduction to refine the scale; and (4) testing the validity and reliability of the final scale.

Results: The questionnaire comprises 45 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a three-factor model, explaining 55.79% of the variance, which encompassed perceived knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) affirmed the suitability of this three-factor model for the data. Additionally, assessments of content validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity all yielded favorable results. The Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability of the entire questionnaire were .944, .911, and .921, respectively.

Conclusions: The MFRSPH-PKAP-Q has been demonstrated to be both valid and reliable, and is therefore recommended for use in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Asian Nursing Research is the official peer-reviewed research journal of the Korean Society of Nursing Science, and is devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will contribute to the body of nursing science and inform the practice of nursing, nursing education, administration, and history, on health issues relevant to nursing, and on the testing of research findings in practice.
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Registered Nurses' Safety Nursing Activities in Nursing Homes. Factors associated with habitual drug use among adolescents: A secondary data analysis. Need for and Acceptance of Digital Health Interventions for Self-Management among Older Adults Living Alone: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure nurses' perceived knowledge, attitudes and practices related to motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Job satisfaction among blood center nurses based on the job crafting model: A mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1