免疫检查点抑制剂治疗多发性硬化症患者的炎症性疾病

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1002/acn3.52287
Saira Afzal, Yadi Li, Brittany Lapin, Le H. Hua, Lucy Boyce Kennedy, Wen Wee Ma, Marisa McGinley, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Amy Kunchok
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂治疗多发性硬化症患者的炎症性疾病","authors":"Saira Afzal,&nbsp;Yadi Li,&nbsp;Brittany Lapin,&nbsp;Le H. Hua,&nbsp;Lucy Boyce Kennedy,&nbsp;Wen Wee Ma,&nbsp;Marisa McGinley,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Cohen,&nbsp;Amy Kunchok","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated disease activity in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to PwMS not treated with ICIs. There were 108 PwMS included (27 PwMS+ICIs and 81 PwMS controls), matched on age, sex, disease duration, DMTs, and MS disease course. Of 27 PwMS+ICIs, one (4%) had a relapse and four (15%) developed new MRI lesions without clinical symptoms. Time to relapse and MRI activity were compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression models. There was no significant difference for either time to relapse (<i>p</i> = 0.34) or MRI activity (<i>p</i> = 0.15) in PwMS+ICIs compared to controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"12 3","pages":"643-647"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52287","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inflammatory disease in people with multiple sclerosis treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"Saira Afzal,&nbsp;Yadi Li,&nbsp;Brittany Lapin,&nbsp;Le H. Hua,&nbsp;Lucy Boyce Kennedy,&nbsp;Wen Wee Ma,&nbsp;Marisa McGinley,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Cohen,&nbsp;Amy Kunchok\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.52287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study evaluated disease activity in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to PwMS not treated with ICIs. There were 108 PwMS included (27 PwMS+ICIs and 81 PwMS controls), matched on age, sex, disease duration, DMTs, and MS disease course. Of 27 PwMS+ICIs, one (4%) had a relapse and four (15%) developed new MRI lesions without clinical symptoms. Time to relapse and MRI activity were compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression models. There was no significant difference for either time to relapse (<i>p</i> = 0.34) or MRI activity (<i>p</i> = 0.15) in PwMS+ICIs compared to controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"643-647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52287\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52287\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者与未接受ICIs治疗的PwMS患者的疾病活动性。纳入108例PwMS(27例PwMS+ICIs和81例PwMS对照),年龄、性别、病程、DMTs和MS病程相匹配。在27例PwMS+ICIs中,1例(4%)复发,4例(15%)出现新的MRI病变,无临床症状。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归模型比较复发时间和MRI活动。与对照组相比,PwMS+ICIs患者的复发时间(p = 0.34)或MRI活性(p = 0.15)均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inflammatory disease in people with multiple sclerosis treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

This study evaluated disease activity in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to PwMS not treated with ICIs. There were 108 PwMS included (27 PwMS+ICIs and 81 PwMS controls), matched on age, sex, disease duration, DMTs, and MS disease course. Of 27 PwMS+ICIs, one (4%) had a relapse and four (15%) developed new MRI lesions without clinical symptoms. Time to relapse and MRI activity were compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression models. There was no significant difference for either time to relapse (p = 0.34) or MRI activity (p = 0.15) in PwMS+ICIs compared to controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
期刊最新文献
Combination Therapy With Vigabatrin and Prednisolone Versus Vigabatrin Alone for Infantile Spasms. Abnormal Synchronization Between Cortical Delta Power and Ripples in Hippocampal Sclerosis. Universal Proteomic Signature After Exercise-Induced Muscle Injury in Muscular Dystrophies. Issue Information Development of a Disease Model for Predicting Postoperative Delirium Using Combined Blood Biomarkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1