对帕金森病的主动保健方法--ParkProReakt 进行混合方法过程评估:疗效-实施混合研究方案。

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000966
Natalie Altschuck, Marlena van Munster, Johanne Stümpel, David Jose Pedrosa, Ingmar Wellach, Hannes Boebinger, Max Geraedts
{"title":"对帕金森病的主动保健方法--ParkProReakt 进行混合方法过程评估:疗效-实施混合研究方案。","authors":"Natalie Altschuck, Marlena van Munster, Johanne Stümpel, David Jose Pedrosa, Ingmar Wellach, Hannes Boebinger, Max Geraedts","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) experience a wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms that have a significant impact on their health and quality of life. Effective care management for PwPD involves monitoring symptoms at home, involving specialised multidisciplinary care providers and enhancing self-management skills. This study protocol describes the process evaluation within a randomised clinical trial to assess the implementation and its impact on patient health outcomes of ParkProReakt-a proactive, multidisciplinary, digitally supported care model for community-dwelling PwPD.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The hybrid efficacy-implementation study will assess key implementation outcomes using the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions alongside a randomised controlled trial. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to assess process data from care providers and patients. The main process outcomes are fidelity, dose, feasibility and context. Context will be analysed through semistructured interviews and focus groups using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. To elucidate potential facilitators and barriers to implementation and to gain deeper insights into the efficacy outcome data, quantitative and qualitative process data will be integrated at an interpretative level using mixed methods. In addition to process evaluation, potential indirect mechanisms of impact will be measured.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the responsible state medical ethics committees in Hesse and Hamburg, Germany. Results will be communicated to the funding body and disseminated through scientific publications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS)-number: DRKS00031092.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"6 2","pages":"e000966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed-methods process evaluation of a proactive approach to healthcare in Parkinson's disease-ParkProReakt: a protocol of a hybrid efficacy-implementation study.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Altschuck, Marlena van Munster, Johanne Stümpel, David Jose Pedrosa, Ingmar Wellach, Hannes Boebinger, Max Geraedts\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) experience a wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms that have a significant impact on their health and quality of life. Effective care management for PwPD involves monitoring symptoms at home, involving specialised multidisciplinary care providers and enhancing self-management skills. This study protocol describes the process evaluation within a randomised clinical trial to assess the implementation and its impact on patient health outcomes of ParkProReakt-a proactive, multidisciplinary, digitally supported care model for community-dwelling PwPD.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The hybrid efficacy-implementation study will assess key implementation outcomes using the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions alongside a randomised controlled trial. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to assess process data from care providers and patients. The main process outcomes are fidelity, dose, feasibility and context. Context will be analysed through semistructured interviews and focus groups using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. To elucidate potential facilitators and barriers to implementation and to gain deeper insights into the efficacy outcome data, quantitative and qualitative process data will be integrated at an interpretative level using mixed methods. In addition to process evaluation, potential indirect mechanisms of impact will be measured.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the responsible state medical ethics committees in Hesse and Hamburg, Germany. Results will be communicated to the funding body and disseminated through scientific publications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS)-number: DRKS00031092.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Neurology Open\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"e000966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Neurology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:简介:帕金森病(PwPD)患者会经历一系列运动和非运动症状,这些症状对他们的健康和生活质量产生重大影响。有效的残疾人士护理管理包括在家中监测症状,由专业的多学科护理提供者参与,以及提高自我管理技能。本研究方案描述了一项随机临床试验中的过程评估,以评估parkproreak的实施及其对患者健康结果的影响——parkproreak是一种针对社区居住的PwPD的主动、多学科、数字支持的护理模式。方法和分析:混合功效-实施研究将使用医学研究委员会复杂干预框架和随机对照试验来评估关键的实施结果。定量和定性相结合的方法将用于评估来自护理提供者和患者的过程数据。主要的过程结果是保真度、剂量、可行性和背景。背景将通过使用实施研究综合框架的半结构化访谈和焦点小组进行分析。为了阐明实施的潜在促进因素和障碍,并深入了解疗效结果数据,将使用混合方法在解释层面整合定量和定性过程数据。除了过程评价外,还将测量潜在的间接影响机制。伦理与传播:本研究获得了德国黑森州和汉堡负责任的国家医学伦理委员会的伦理批准。结果将传达给资助机构,并通过科学出版物传播。试验注册:本研究已在德国临床研究注册中心(DRKS)注册,编号:DRKS00031092。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mixed-methods process evaluation of a proactive approach to healthcare in Parkinson's disease-ParkProReakt: a protocol of a hybrid efficacy-implementation study.

Abstract:

Introduction: People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) experience a wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms that have a significant impact on their health and quality of life. Effective care management for PwPD involves monitoring symptoms at home, involving specialised multidisciplinary care providers and enhancing self-management skills. This study protocol describes the process evaluation within a randomised clinical trial to assess the implementation and its impact on patient health outcomes of ParkProReakt-a proactive, multidisciplinary, digitally supported care model for community-dwelling PwPD.

Methods and analysis: The hybrid efficacy-implementation study will assess key implementation outcomes using the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions alongside a randomised controlled trial. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to assess process data from care providers and patients. The main process outcomes are fidelity, dose, feasibility and context. Context will be analysed through semistructured interviews and focus groups using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. To elucidate potential facilitators and barriers to implementation and to gain deeper insights into the efficacy outcome data, quantitative and qualitative process data will be integrated at an interpretative level using mixed methods. In addition to process evaluation, potential indirect mechanisms of impact will be measured.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the responsible state medical ethics committees in Hesse and Hamburg, Germany. Results will be communicated to the funding body and disseminated through scientific publications.

Trial registration: This study was registered with the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS)-number: DRKS00031092.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spinal cord demyelination predicts neurological deterioration in patients with mild degenerative cervical myelopathy. Qualitative systematic review on the lived experience of functional neurological disorder. Acute therapeutic effects and pathophysiology of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis neuropathy. Optimising early detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of quantitative screening tools for primary care. Cognitive impairment in PSP compared with PD: assessment by clinical subtype and longitudinal change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1