德国和欧洲医疗服务的利用——欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS 3, 2018 - 2020)的结果。

Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.25646/12921
Laura Krause, Franziska Prütz, Anne Starker, Yong Du, Giselle Sarganas, Ronny Kuhnert, Julia Thom, Alexander Rommel
{"title":"德国和欧洲医疗服务的利用——欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS 3, 2018 - 2020)的结果。","authors":"Laura Krause, Franziska Prütz, Anne Starker, Yong Du, Giselle Sarganas, Ronny Kuhnert, Julia Thom, Alexander Rommel","doi":"10.25646/12921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Needs-based care is a central concern of healthcare policy. A European comparison of the utilisation of medical services can help to assess national data and identify the need for action.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article describes indicators on the utilisation of outpatient and inpatient services, medical examinations and the use of medicines from the third wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3) and compares the results from Germany with the European averages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age-standardised, the utilisation of medical services in Germany was above the European average without exception, whereby demographic and social differences were similar. Almost all services were utilised more frequently by women and in older age groups. Exceptions are inpatient services and colonoscopy, where there was no difference between the sexes, and more frequent use of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services and non-prescription medication among younger adults. Specialist medical and dental services were used more frequently in the high education group, psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services as well as inpatient services and prescription medication in the low education group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The European comparison requires a differentiated categorisation of the findings. While the high utilisation in Germany for some evidence-based services (e.g. colonoscopy, dentistry) indicates good access to care, the high inpatient utilisation, for example, is also the subject of critical discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":"9 4","pages":"e12921"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilisation of medical services in Germany and Europe - Results of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3, 2018 - 2020).\",\"authors\":\"Laura Krause, Franziska Prütz, Anne Starker, Yong Du, Giselle Sarganas, Ronny Kuhnert, Julia Thom, Alexander Rommel\",\"doi\":\"10.25646/12921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Needs-based care is a central concern of healthcare policy. A European comparison of the utilisation of medical services can help to assess national data and identify the need for action.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article describes indicators on the utilisation of outpatient and inpatient services, medical examinations and the use of medicines from the third wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3) and compares the results from Germany with the European averages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age-standardised, the utilisation of medical services in Germany was above the European average without exception, whereby demographic and social differences were similar. Almost all services were utilised more frequently by women and in older age groups. Exceptions are inpatient services and colonoscopy, where there was no difference between the sexes, and more frequent use of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services and non-prescription medication among younger adults. Specialist medical and dental services were used more frequently in the high education group, psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services as well as inpatient services and prescription medication in the low education group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The European comparison requires a differentiated categorisation of the findings. While the high utilisation in Germany for some evidence-based services (e.g. colonoscopy, dentistry) indicates good access to care, the high inpatient utilisation, for example, is also the subject of critical discussion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health monitoring\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"e12921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25646/12921\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25646/12921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于需求的护理是医疗保健政策的核心问题。对欧洲医疗服务利用情况进行比较有助于评估国家数据并确定采取行动的必要性。方法:本文描述了来自第三波欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS 3)的门诊和住院服务利用、医疗检查和药物使用的指标,并将德国的结果与欧洲平均水平进行了比较。结果:年龄标准化后,德国的医疗服务利用率毫无例外地高于欧洲平均水平,因此人口和社会差异是相似的。妇女和年龄较大的群体更经常地利用几乎所有的服务。例外情况是住院服务和结肠镜检查,在这方面没有性别差异,在年轻人中更频繁地使用精神病学和心理治疗服务以及非处方药。高等教育群体更频繁地使用专科医疗和牙科服务,低教育群体更频繁地使用精神病和心理治疗服务以及住院服务和处方药。结论:欧洲的比较需要对研究结果进行区分分类。虽然德国对一些循证服务(如结肠镜检查、牙科)的高使用率表明获得护理的机会很好,但例如,住院病人的高使用率也是关键讨论的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilisation of medical services in Germany and Europe - Results of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3, 2018 - 2020).

Background: Needs-based care is a central concern of healthcare policy. A European comparison of the utilisation of medical services can help to assess national data and identify the need for action.

Methods: This article describes indicators on the utilisation of outpatient and inpatient services, medical examinations and the use of medicines from the third wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3) and compares the results from Germany with the European averages.

Results: Age-standardised, the utilisation of medical services in Germany was above the European average without exception, whereby demographic and social differences were similar. Almost all services were utilised more frequently by women and in older age groups. Exceptions are inpatient services and colonoscopy, where there was no difference between the sexes, and more frequent use of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services and non-prescription medication among younger adults. Specialist medical and dental services were used more frequently in the high education group, psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services as well as inpatient services and prescription medication in the low education group.

Conclusions: The European comparison requires a differentiated categorisation of the findings. While the high utilisation in Germany for some evidence-based services (e.g. colonoscopy, dentistry) indicates good access to care, the high inpatient utilisation, for example, is also the subject of critical discussion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study. A healthy Europe through data, information and cooperation. Towards a European health information system: The BRIDGE Health, InfAct and PHIRI projects. Towards a sustainable set of European Core Health Indicators (ECHI). Diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases in Germany and Europe - results of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3, 2018 - 2020).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1