高流量鼻插管静脉麻醉可改善老年人输尿管镜碎石术的恢复:一项前瞻性对照研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02869-z
Lifei Tang, Ran Guo, Yaochen Quan, Haiwen Zhang, Yingcong Qian, Youjia Yu, Shaoyong Song, Jian Li
{"title":"高流量鼻插管静脉麻醉可改善老年人输尿管镜碎石术的恢复:一项前瞻性对照研究。","authors":"Lifei Tang, Ran Guo, Yaochen Quan, Haiwen Zhang, Yingcong Qian, Youjia Yu, Shaoyong Song, Jian Li","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02869-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous anesthesia with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been reported to benefit oxygen reserves and enhance postoperative recovery in surgeries requiring low neuromuscular blockade. This study investigated whether HFNC improves recovery quality in elderly undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (UHLL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 106 elderly patients undergoing UHLL, with 96 patients (48 per group) included in the final analysis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified by sex) to receive either HFNC (HFNC group) or laryngeal mask airway (LMA) assisted general anesthesia (LMA group). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 15-questionnaire (QoR-15) scores. Secondary outcomes included PACU stay duration, time to out-of-bed mobilization, length of hospital stay, airway dryness scores, surgeons' satisfaction, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the LMA group, the HFNC group achieved significantly higher QoR-15 scores (125.5 [118.3-130.0] vs. 136.5 [126.3-139.0]; difference = -9, 95%CI, -11 to -5; P < 0.001) on the first postoperative day. For secondary outcomes, the HFNC group had a shorter PACU stay (difference = 11.6 min, 95% CI, 10.4-12.8 min), earlier out-of-bed mobilization (difference = 31.8 min, 95% CI, 30.6-33.1 min), lower mouth (difference = 2, 95% CI, 1-3) and throat dryness scores (difference = 2, 95% CI, 1-3) at 30 min post-operation, and lower rates of postoperative sore throat (14.6% vs. 0%; P = 0.019) and cough with sputum (odds ratio [OR] = 9.4, 95% CI, 1.1-78.4). No significant differences were observed between the groups for other measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HFNC can improve recovery quality in elderly patients after UHLL compared to LMA-assisted general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered on July 20, 2023, in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300073757).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous anesthesia with high-flow nasal cannula improves recovery in elderly undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Lifei Tang, Ran Guo, Yaochen Quan, Haiwen Zhang, Yingcong Qian, Youjia Yu, Shaoyong Song, Jian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-024-02869-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous anesthesia with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been reported to benefit oxygen reserves and enhance postoperative recovery in surgeries requiring low neuromuscular blockade. This study investigated whether HFNC improves recovery quality in elderly undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (UHLL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 106 elderly patients undergoing UHLL, with 96 patients (48 per group) included in the final analysis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified by sex) to receive either HFNC (HFNC group) or laryngeal mask airway (LMA) assisted general anesthesia (LMA group). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 15-questionnaire (QoR-15) scores. Secondary outcomes included PACU stay duration, time to out-of-bed mobilization, length of hospital stay, airway dryness scores, surgeons' satisfaction, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the LMA group, the HFNC group achieved significantly higher QoR-15 scores (125.5 [118.3-130.0] vs. 136.5 [126.3-139.0]; difference = -9, 95%CI, -11 to -5; P < 0.001) on the first postoperative day. For secondary outcomes, the HFNC group had a shorter PACU stay (difference = 11.6 min, 95% CI, 10.4-12.8 min), earlier out-of-bed mobilization (difference = 31.8 min, 95% CI, 30.6-33.1 min), lower mouth (difference = 2, 95% CI, 1-3) and throat dryness scores (difference = 2, 95% CI, 1-3) at 30 min post-operation, and lower rates of postoperative sore throat (14.6% vs. 0%; P = 0.019) and cough with sputum (odds ratio [OR] = 9.4, 95% CI, 1.1-78.4). No significant differences were observed between the groups for other measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HFNC can improve recovery quality in elderly patients after UHLL compared to LMA-assisted general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered on July 20, 2023, in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300073757).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02869-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02869-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有报道称,在需要低神经肌肉阻滞的手术中,使用高流量鼻插管(HFNC)进行静脉麻醉有利于氧气储备和术后恢复。本研究探讨了高流量鼻插管是否能提高接受输尿管镜钬激光碎石术(UHLL)的老年患者的术后恢复质量:我们招募了 106 名接受 UHLL 的老年患者,最终分析包括 96 名患者(每组 48 名)。患者被随机分配(1:1,按性别分层)接受 HFNC(HFNC 组)或喉罩气道 (LMA) 辅助全身麻醉(LMA 组)。主要结果是恢复质量 15 问卷 (QoR-15) 评分。次要结果包括 PACU 停留时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、气道干燥度评分、外科医生满意度和术后并发症:结果:与 LMA 组相比,HFNC 组的 QoR-15 评分明显更高(125.5 [118.3-130.0] vs. 136.5 [126.3-139.0];差异 = -9,95%CI,-11 至 -5;P 结论:HFNC 可以改善老年患者的康复质量:与 LMA 辅助全身麻醉相比,HFNC 可以改善老年患者 UHLL 后的恢复质量:本试验于2023年7月20日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2300073757)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous anesthesia with high-flow nasal cannula improves recovery in elderly undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective controlled study.

Background: Intravenous anesthesia with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been reported to benefit oxygen reserves and enhance postoperative recovery in surgeries requiring low neuromuscular blockade. This study investigated whether HFNC improves recovery quality in elderly undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (UHLL).

Methods: We enrolled 106 elderly patients undergoing UHLL, with 96 patients (48 per group) included in the final analysis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified by sex) to receive either HFNC (HFNC group) or laryngeal mask airway (LMA) assisted general anesthesia (LMA group). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 15-questionnaire (QoR-15) scores. Secondary outcomes included PACU stay duration, time to out-of-bed mobilization, length of hospital stay, airway dryness scores, surgeons' satisfaction, and postoperative complications.

Results: Compared to the LMA group, the HFNC group achieved significantly higher QoR-15 scores (125.5 [118.3-130.0] vs. 136.5 [126.3-139.0]; difference = -9, 95%CI, -11 to -5; P < 0.001) on the first postoperative day. For secondary outcomes, the HFNC group had a shorter PACU stay (difference = 11.6 min, 95% CI, 10.4-12.8 min), earlier out-of-bed mobilization (difference = 31.8 min, 95% CI, 30.6-33.1 min), lower mouth (difference = 2, 95% CI, 1-3) and throat dryness scores (difference = 2, 95% CI, 1-3) at 30 min post-operation, and lower rates of postoperative sore throat (14.6% vs. 0%; P = 0.019) and cough with sputum (odds ratio [OR] = 9.4, 95% CI, 1.1-78.4). No significant differences were observed between the groups for other measures.

Conclusions: HFNC can improve recovery quality in elderly patients after UHLL compared to LMA-assisted general anesthesia.

Trial registration: This trial was registered on July 20, 2023, in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300073757).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Mortality and patient disposition after ICU tracheostomy for secretion management vs. prolonged ventilation: a retrospective cohort study. Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring. Opioid sparing anesthesia in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver resection: a controlled randomized double-blind study. "The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty". A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting perioperative transfusion in children undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1