机械通气ICU患者用氯己定冲洗一次性与多用途气管内吸引管:可行性随机对照试验嵌入定性研究的研究方案

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1111/nicc.13227
Mohamed H Eid, Kevin Hambridge, Pat Schofield, Jos M Latour
{"title":"机械通气ICU患者用氯己定冲洗一次性与多用途气管内吸引管:可行性随机对照试验嵌入定性研究的研究方案","authors":"Mohamed H Eid, Kevin Hambridge, Pat Schofield, Jos M Latour","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endotracheal suction catheters are often used multiple times during endotracheal suctioning procedures in resource-limited intensive care units (ICU). The impact of this practice on mechanically ventilated patients' outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this feasibility randomized controlled trial (fRCT) is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of single-use versus multiple-use endotracheal suction catheters flushed with chlorhexidine in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a three-armed fRCT with an embedded qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial involves three groups. One group includes endotracheal suctioning using a single-use catheter; the second group includes a multiple-use endotracheal suction catheter flushed with chlorhexidine and the control group includes a multiple-use endotracheal suction catheter flushed with normal saline. Sixty adult ICU patients (20 in each group) will be recruited, along with 12-16 ICU nurses delivering the interventions, and 12-16 patients' next-of-kin for semi-structured interviews. The study protocol has been approved by two ethics committees. Study recruitment will be conducted over an 8-month period with an expected start date of 12 April 2024.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The feasibility outcome measures will be recruitment, retention, and follow-up measures as well as the identification of clinical outcomes such as Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) using the modified clinical pulmonary infection score, and ICU length-of-stay.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This study will help ICU nurses to understand how different methods of endotracheal suctioning affects patients in ICUs with limited resources. The findings could influence clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-use versus multiple-use endotracheal suction catheters flushed with chlorhexidine in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: A study protocol of a feasibility randomized controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed H Eid, Kevin Hambridge, Pat Schofield, Jos M Latour\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.13227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endotracheal suction catheters are often used multiple times during endotracheal suctioning procedures in resource-limited intensive care units (ICU). The impact of this practice on mechanically ventilated patients' outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this feasibility randomized controlled trial (fRCT) is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of single-use versus multiple-use endotracheal suction catheters flushed with chlorhexidine in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a three-armed fRCT with an embedded qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial involves three groups. One group includes endotracheal suctioning using a single-use catheter; the second group includes a multiple-use endotracheal suction catheter flushed with chlorhexidine and the control group includes a multiple-use endotracheal suction catheter flushed with normal saline. Sixty adult ICU patients (20 in each group) will be recruited, along with 12-16 ICU nurses delivering the interventions, and 12-16 patients' next-of-kin for semi-structured interviews. The study protocol has been approved by two ethics committees. Study recruitment will be conducted over an 8-month period with an expected start date of 12 April 2024.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The feasibility outcome measures will be recruitment, retention, and follow-up measures as well as the identification of clinical outcomes such as Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) using the modified clinical pulmonary infection score, and ICU length-of-stay.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This study will help ICU nurses to understand how different methods of endotracheal suctioning affects patients in ICUs with limited resources. The findings could influence clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在资源有限的重症监护病房(ICU),气管吸痰过程中经常多次使用气管吸痰导管。这种做法对机械通气患者预后的影响尚不清楚。目的:本可行性随机对照试验(fRCT)的目的是评估在ICU机械通气患者中使用氯己定冲洗一次性和多次气管吸引管的可行性和可接受性。设计:本研究是一项具有嵌入定性研究的三臂fRCT。方法:试验分为三组。一组包括使用一次性导管进行气管内吸引;第二组包括经氯己定冲洗的多用途气管内吸引导管,对照组包括经生理盐水冲洗的多用途气管内吸引导管。将招募60名成年ICU患者(每组20名),以及12-16名提供干预措施的ICU护士,以及12-16名患者的近亲进行半结构化访谈。该研究方案已得到两个伦理委员会的批准。研究招募将在8个月内进行,预计开始日期为2024年4月12日。结果测量:可行性结果测量将包括招募、保留和随访措施,以及使用修改后的临床肺部感染评分确定呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)和ICU住院时间等临床结果。与临床实践的相关性:本研究将帮助ICU护士了解不同的气管内吸引方法对资源有限的ICU患者的影响。这些发现可能会影响临床实践并改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-use versus multiple-use endotracheal suction catheters flushed with chlorhexidine in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: A study protocol of a feasibility randomized controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study.

Background: Endotracheal suction catheters are often used multiple times during endotracheal suctioning procedures in resource-limited intensive care units (ICU). The impact of this practice on mechanically ventilated patients' outcomes remains unclear.

Aim: The aim of this feasibility randomized controlled trial (fRCT) is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of single-use versus multiple-use endotracheal suction catheters flushed with chlorhexidine in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Design: This study is a three-armed fRCT with an embedded qualitative study.

Methods: The trial involves three groups. One group includes endotracheal suctioning using a single-use catheter; the second group includes a multiple-use endotracheal suction catheter flushed with chlorhexidine and the control group includes a multiple-use endotracheal suction catheter flushed with normal saline. Sixty adult ICU patients (20 in each group) will be recruited, along with 12-16 ICU nurses delivering the interventions, and 12-16 patients' next-of-kin for semi-structured interviews. The study protocol has been approved by two ethics committees. Study recruitment will be conducted over an 8-month period with an expected start date of 12 April 2024.

Outcome measures: The feasibility outcome measures will be recruitment, retention, and follow-up measures as well as the identification of clinical outcomes such as Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) using the modified clinical pulmonary infection score, and ICU length-of-stay.

Relevance to clinical practice: This study will help ICU nurses to understand how different methods of endotracheal suctioning affects patients in ICUs with limited resources. The findings could influence clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
期刊最新文献
Burnout, collective efficacy and the social network of an intensive care unit. Relationship between ICU nurses' perception of patient safety, caring behaviour, professional self-efficacy and nursing deficits: A multiple mediation analysis. Patients' and family members' dyadic experience of post-operative delirium in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study. Difference between estimated and actual body weight in an intensive care unit-A service evaluation. Final-year nursing students' placement experiences in a critical care setting: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1