{"title":"正常年轻参与者HRK-9000A meibography的可重复性和受试者内变异性。","authors":"Liat Gantz, Judith Wilks, Reut Ifrah","doi":"10.1111/opo.13437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reliable assessment is critical for diagnosing and managing meibomian gland dysfunction. Multi-functional diagnostic devices, such as meibographers, streamline clinical workflows by integrating multiple ocular assessments. Ensuring reproducibility across examiners is vital for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of treatment. This prospective study determined the inter-examiner reproducibility (IER), inter-rater reproducibility (IRR) and within-subject variability (WSV) of the Huvitz HRK-9000A meibographer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Meibomian glands (MGs) of both eyelids of healthy participants were captured during the same session by Examiner 1 (E1) and Examiner 2 (E2) in a counter-balanced design. The images were rated offline by E1, E2 and an Independent rater (R1). The inter-examiner reproducibility (IER between E1 vs. E2) and inter-rater reproducibility (IRR between E1 vs. R1 and E2 vs. R1) were determined based on non-parametric Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted Kappa (κ) values. Within-subject variability (WSV) was determined using ICCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean MG loss of the upper (E1: 1.0 ± 0.8 vs. R1: 0.9 ± 0.8, E2: 1.2 ± 0.8 vs. R1: 0.9 ± 0.7) and lower eyelids (E1: 1.9 ± 0.9 vs. R1: 2.1 ± 1.1, E2: 1.5 ± 1.0 vs. R1: 1.8 ± 1.0) of 35 participants (mean age 22 ± 3 years, range 19-30) was significantly correlated (p < 0.001) for all pairs of examiners (E1-E2, E1-R1 and E2-R1), but was significantly different for the upper eyelids of E2 vs. E1 (p < 0.002) and E2 vs. R1 (p < 0.003). Median differences between pairs of raters for both eyelids were close to zero, with >74% of comparisons falling within the interquartile range, except for the upper eyelids of E2 vs. E1 and E2 vs. R1 (63% and 66%, respectively). IRR demonstrated moderate agreement (0.43-0.57) with good reliability (ICC range 0.76-0.86) for the upper eyelids and good agreement (0.60-0.65) with good reliability (ICC range 0.85-0.88) for the lower eyelids. The WSV was excellent (ICCs for repeated measurements > 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HRK-9000A meibographer demonstrated excellent reliability, with good inter-examiner and inter-rater reproducibility. It is suitable for meibographic assessment, follow-up or treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility and within-subject variability of HRK-9000A meibography in normal young participants.\",\"authors\":\"Liat Gantz, Judith Wilks, Reut Ifrah\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reliable assessment is critical for diagnosing and managing meibomian gland dysfunction. Multi-functional diagnostic devices, such as meibographers, streamline clinical workflows by integrating multiple ocular assessments. Ensuring reproducibility across examiners is vital for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of treatment. This prospective study determined the inter-examiner reproducibility (IER), inter-rater reproducibility (IRR) and within-subject variability (WSV) of the Huvitz HRK-9000A meibographer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Meibomian glands (MGs) of both eyelids of healthy participants were captured during the same session by Examiner 1 (E1) and Examiner 2 (E2) in a counter-balanced design. The images were rated offline by E1, E2 and an Independent rater (R1). The inter-examiner reproducibility (IER between E1 vs. E2) and inter-rater reproducibility (IRR between E1 vs. R1 and E2 vs. R1) were determined based on non-parametric Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted Kappa (κ) values. Within-subject variability (WSV) was determined using ICCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean MG loss of the upper (E1: 1.0 ± 0.8 vs. R1: 0.9 ± 0.8, E2: 1.2 ± 0.8 vs. R1: 0.9 ± 0.7) and lower eyelids (E1: 1.9 ± 0.9 vs. R1: 2.1 ± 1.1, E2: 1.5 ± 1.0 vs. R1: 1.8 ± 1.0) of 35 participants (mean age 22 ± 3 years, range 19-30) was significantly correlated (p < 0.001) for all pairs of examiners (E1-E2, E1-R1 and E2-R1), but was significantly different for the upper eyelids of E2 vs. E1 (p < 0.002) and E2 vs. R1 (p < 0.003). Median differences between pairs of raters for both eyelids were close to zero, with >74% of comparisons falling within the interquartile range, except for the upper eyelids of E2 vs. E1 and E2 vs. R1 (63% and 66%, respectively). IRR demonstrated moderate agreement (0.43-0.57) with good reliability (ICC range 0.76-0.86) for the upper eyelids and good agreement (0.60-0.65) with good reliability (ICC range 0.85-0.88) for the lower eyelids. The WSV was excellent (ICCs for repeated measurements > 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HRK-9000A meibographer demonstrated excellent reliability, with good inter-examiner and inter-rater reproducibility. It is suitable for meibographic assessment, follow-up or treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13437\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:可靠的评估是诊断和治疗睑板腺功能障碍的关键。多功能诊断设备,如减数仪,通过整合多种眼部评估来简化临床工作流程。确保检查人员的重复性对于准确诊断和监测治疗至关重要。本前瞻性研究确定了Huvitz HRK-9000A meibographer的受试者间可重复性(IER)、受试者间可重复性(IRR)和受试者内可变性(WSV)。方法:采用平衡设计,由审查员1 (E1)和审查员2 (E2)在同一时段捕获健康受试者双眼睑的睑板腺(mg)。图像由E1、E2和独立评分者(R1)离线评分。根据非参数Bland-Altman图、类内相关系数(ICCs)和加权Kappa (κ)值确定检查者间可重复性(E1与E2之间的IER)和分级间可重复性(E1与R1之间的IRR)。受试者内变异性(WSV)采用ICCs测定。结果:意思是MG损失上(E1: 1.0±0.8 vs R1: 0.9±0.8,E2: 1.2±0.8 vs R1: 0.9±0.7)和下眼睑(E1: 1.9±0.9 vs R1: 2.1±1.1,E2: 1.5±1.0 vs R1: 1.8±1.0)35参与者(平均年龄22±3年,范围19-30)显著相关(p四分位范围内的比较下降74%,除了上眼睑的E2和E1和E2与R1(分别为63%和66%)。上眼睑的IRR一致性中等(0.43-0.57),信度良好(ICC范围0.76-0.86);下眼睑的IRR一致性较好(0.60-0.65),信度良好(ICC范围0.85-0.88)。WSV非常好(重复测量的ICCs为bb0 0.90)。结论:HRK-9000A meibographer具有良好的可靠性,具有良好的审查员间和审查员间的重复性。它适用于量化评估、随访或治疗。
Reproducibility and within-subject variability of HRK-9000A meibography in normal young participants.
Purpose: Reliable assessment is critical for diagnosing and managing meibomian gland dysfunction. Multi-functional diagnostic devices, such as meibographers, streamline clinical workflows by integrating multiple ocular assessments. Ensuring reproducibility across examiners is vital for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of treatment. This prospective study determined the inter-examiner reproducibility (IER), inter-rater reproducibility (IRR) and within-subject variability (WSV) of the Huvitz HRK-9000A meibographer.
Methods: Meibomian glands (MGs) of both eyelids of healthy participants were captured during the same session by Examiner 1 (E1) and Examiner 2 (E2) in a counter-balanced design. The images were rated offline by E1, E2 and an Independent rater (R1). The inter-examiner reproducibility (IER between E1 vs. E2) and inter-rater reproducibility (IRR between E1 vs. R1 and E2 vs. R1) were determined based on non-parametric Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted Kappa (κ) values. Within-subject variability (WSV) was determined using ICCs.
Results: Mean MG loss of the upper (E1: 1.0 ± 0.8 vs. R1: 0.9 ± 0.8, E2: 1.2 ± 0.8 vs. R1: 0.9 ± 0.7) and lower eyelids (E1: 1.9 ± 0.9 vs. R1: 2.1 ± 1.1, E2: 1.5 ± 1.0 vs. R1: 1.8 ± 1.0) of 35 participants (mean age 22 ± 3 years, range 19-30) was significantly correlated (p < 0.001) for all pairs of examiners (E1-E2, E1-R1 and E2-R1), but was significantly different for the upper eyelids of E2 vs. E1 (p < 0.002) and E2 vs. R1 (p < 0.003). Median differences between pairs of raters for both eyelids were close to zero, with >74% of comparisons falling within the interquartile range, except for the upper eyelids of E2 vs. E1 and E2 vs. R1 (63% and 66%, respectively). IRR demonstrated moderate agreement (0.43-0.57) with good reliability (ICC range 0.76-0.86) for the upper eyelids and good agreement (0.60-0.65) with good reliability (ICC range 0.85-0.88) for the lower eyelids. The WSV was excellent (ICCs for repeated measurements > 0.90).
Conclusions: The HRK-9000A meibographer demonstrated excellent reliability, with good inter-examiner and inter-rater reproducibility. It is suitable for meibographic assessment, follow-up or treatment.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry.
OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.