筛查残疾心理风险与肌肉骨骼疾病患者矫形手术适宜性之间的关系——来自瑞典2009-2011年初级保健的随机对照试验数据

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2448709
Karin S Samsson, Susanne Bernhardsson, Maria Sandborgh, Maria E H Larsson
{"title":"筛查残疾心理风险与肌肉骨骼疾病患者矫形手术适宜性之间的关系——来自瑞典2009-2011年初级保健的随机对照试验数据","authors":"Karin S Samsson, Susanne Bernhardsson, Maria Sandborgh, Maria E H Larsson","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2448709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To understand, diagnose and treat patients with musculoskeletal disorders, psychological risk factors should be assessed, and the association between psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery should be investigated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery, and to examine a physiotherapist's ability to assess risk for disability in patients referred for orthopedic consultation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients (<i>n</i> = 192) were assessed by a physiotherapist or an orthopedic surgeon to determine the need for surgery. The Pain Belief Screening Instrument (PBSI) was used to screen for psychological risk. The physiotherapist assessed psychological risk for disability based on yellow flags. Association between PBSI risk profile and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery was analyzed using logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment of risk was calculated using a binary classification model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orthopedic surgery was 2.28 times more likely to be considered an appropriate intervention for patients with a high PBSI risk profile (95% CI 1.09;4.78). The physiotherapist's risk assessment correctly identified 88% of those at low risk (specificity) and 32% of those at high risk for disability (sensitivity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that orthopedic surgery is likely to be considered appropriate for patients with a high PBSI risk profile. The high specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment implies good awareness of psychological factors. The low sensitivity suggests a need for using a screening tool such as the PBSI, to guide management decisions.<b>Trial registration</b>: Clinical Trials NCT02265172, retrospectively registered June 10, 2014.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery in patients with musculoskeletal disorders - data from a Swedish RCT in primary care 2009-2011.\",\"authors\":\"Karin S Samsson, Susanne Bernhardsson, Maria Sandborgh, Maria E H Larsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2024.2448709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To understand, diagnose and treat patients with musculoskeletal disorders, psychological risk factors should be assessed, and the association between psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery should be investigated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery, and to examine a physiotherapist's ability to assess risk for disability in patients referred for orthopedic consultation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients (<i>n</i> = 192) were assessed by a physiotherapist or an orthopedic surgeon to determine the need for surgery. The Pain Belief Screening Instrument (PBSI) was used to screen for psychological risk. The physiotherapist assessed psychological risk for disability based on yellow flags. Association between PBSI risk profile and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery was analyzed using logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment of risk was calculated using a binary classification model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orthopedic surgery was 2.28 times more likely to be considered an appropriate intervention for patients with a high PBSI risk profile (95% CI 1.09;4.78). The physiotherapist's risk assessment correctly identified 88% of those at low risk (specificity) and 32% of those at high risk for disability (sensitivity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that orthopedic surgery is likely to be considered appropriate for patients with a high PBSI risk profile. The high specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment implies good awareness of psychological factors. The low sensitivity suggests a need for using a screening tool such as the PBSI, to guide management decisions.<b>Trial registration</b>: Clinical Trials NCT02265172, retrospectively registered June 10, 2014.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2448709\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2448709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:为了了解、诊断和治疗肌肉骨骼疾病患者,需要评估心理危险因素,并研究残疾心理风险与矫形手术适宜性之间的关系。目的:调查筛查的残疾心理风险与骨科手术的适当性之间的关系,并检查物理治疗师评估骨科会诊患者残疾风险的能力。方法:由物理治疗师或骨科医生评估患者(n = 192),以确定是否需要手术。采用疼痛信念筛查量表(PBSI)进行心理风险筛查。物理治疗师根据黄旗评估残疾的心理风险。采用logistic回归分析PBSI风险概况与骨科手术适宜性之间的关系。物理治疗师评估风险的敏感性和特异性使用二元分类模型计算。结果:对于PBSI风险较高的患者,骨科手术被认为是适当干预措施的可能性高出2.28倍(95% CI 1.09;4.78)。物理治疗师的风险评估正确地识别了88%的低风险(特异性)和32%的高风险残疾(敏感性)。结论:研究结果表明,对于PBSI高危患者,骨科手术可能被认为是合适的。物理治疗师评估的高特异性意味着对心理因素的良好认识。低敏感性表明需要使用PBSI等筛选工具来指导管理决策。试验注册:临床试验NCT02265172,回顾性注册于2014年6月10日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery in patients with musculoskeletal disorders - data from a Swedish RCT in primary care 2009-2011.

Introduction: To understand, diagnose and treat patients with musculoskeletal disorders, psychological risk factors should be assessed, and the association between psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery should be investigated.

Purpose: To investigate the association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery, and to examine a physiotherapist's ability to assess risk for disability in patients referred for orthopedic consultation.

Method: Patients (n = 192) were assessed by a physiotherapist or an orthopedic surgeon to determine the need for surgery. The Pain Belief Screening Instrument (PBSI) was used to screen for psychological risk. The physiotherapist assessed psychological risk for disability based on yellow flags. Association between PBSI risk profile and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery was analyzed using logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment of risk was calculated using a binary classification model.

Results: Orthopedic surgery was 2.28 times more likely to be considered an appropriate intervention for patients with a high PBSI risk profile (95% CI 1.09;4.78). The physiotherapist's risk assessment correctly identified 88% of those at low risk (specificity) and 32% of those at high risk for disability (sensitivity).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that orthopedic surgery is likely to be considered appropriate for patients with a high PBSI risk profile. The high specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment implies good awareness of psychological factors. The low sensitivity suggests a need for using a screening tool such as the PBSI, to guide management decisions.Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT02265172, retrospectively registered June 10, 2014.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT) in people with Parkinson disease. Feasibility study of a home-based graded motor imagery intervention (GraMI protocol) for amputees with phantom limb pain. Can physiotherapy in an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation setting improve physical function? A long-term mixed methods follow-up study. "Exploring job demands and resources influencing mental health and work engagement among physical therapists: a cross-sectional survey of Norwegian physical therapists." Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1