支持社区心理健康中数字工具的个性化使用:技术专家试点研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Community Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s10597-024-01439-4
Monirah Al-Abdulmunem, Ellen E Kozelka, Stephanie C Acquilano, Robert E Drake, Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, Glyn Elwyn
{"title":"支持社区心理健康中数字工具的个性化使用:技术专家试点研究。","authors":"Monirah Al-Abdulmunem, Ellen E Kozelka, Stephanie C Acquilano, Robert E Drake, Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, Glyn Elwyn","doi":"10.1007/s10597-024-01439-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of the technology specialist intervention, which assists clients in achieving mental health recovery and well-being goals via existing digital tools in a real-world community mental health setting. Thirteen adult clients with serious mental illness and their providers completed baseline, 3-, and 6-month assessments, including goal setting, self-efficacy, activation, and acceptability measures, along with weekly ecological momentary assessments. Clients selected goals and corresponding tools, used the tools steadily, and showed improvement in activation and self-efficacy. Most participating clients (82%, n = 9) and providers (80%, n = 8) found the intervention acceptable. These preliminary findings show that the technology specialist intervention is promising and warrants further testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting the Individualized Use of Digital Tools in Community Mental Health: The Technology Specialist Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Monirah Al-Abdulmunem, Ellen E Kozelka, Stephanie C Acquilano, Robert E Drake, Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, Glyn Elwyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10597-024-01439-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of the technology specialist intervention, which assists clients in achieving mental health recovery and well-being goals via existing digital tools in a real-world community mental health setting. Thirteen adult clients with serious mental illness and their providers completed baseline, 3-, and 6-month assessments, including goal setting, self-efficacy, activation, and acceptability measures, along with weekly ecological momentary assessments. Clients selected goals and corresponding tools, used the tools steadily, and showed improvement in activation and self-efficacy. Most participating clients (82%, n = 9) and providers (80%, n = 8) found the intervention acceptable. These preliminary findings show that the technology specialist intervention is promising and warrants further testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01439-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01439-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项试点研究评估了技术专家干预的可行性,该干预帮助客户在现实世界的社区心理健康环境中通过现有的数字工具实现心理健康恢复和福祉目标。13名患有严重精神疾病的成年来访者及其服务提供者完成了基线、3个月和6个月的评估,包括目标设定、自我效能、激活和可接受性措施,以及每周的生态瞬时评估。客户选择目标和相应的工具,稳定地使用工具,在激活和自我效能方面有所提高。大多数参与的客户(82%,n = 9)和提供者(80%,n = 8)认为干预是可以接受的。这些初步发现表明,技术专家干预是有希望的,值得进一步测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting the Individualized Use of Digital Tools in Community Mental Health: The Technology Specialist Pilot Study.

This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of the technology specialist intervention, which assists clients in achieving mental health recovery and well-being goals via existing digital tools in a real-world community mental health setting. Thirteen adult clients with serious mental illness and their providers completed baseline, 3-, and 6-month assessments, including goal setting, self-efficacy, activation, and acceptability measures, along with weekly ecological momentary assessments. Clients selected goals and corresponding tools, used the tools steadily, and showed improvement in activation and self-efficacy. Most participating clients (82%, n = 9) and providers (80%, n = 8) found the intervention acceptable. These preliminary findings show that the technology specialist intervention is promising and warrants further testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
期刊最新文献
Introduction to Special Issue on Recovery at 30: Emancipation, Cooptation, or the End of an Era? Autoethnographic Reflections on Mental Distress and Medication Management: Conceptualising Biomedical and Recovery Models of Mental Health. Antipsychotics and Identity: The Adverse Effect No One is Talking About. Promoting Reflection on the Process of Recovery: Unique Contributions from Literature and the Humanities for Practitioner. Neorecovery: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship between Neoliberalism and the Recovery Movement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1