髁突增生的术后结果:比例髁突切除术与正颌手术。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011085
Adir Cohen, Heli Rushinek, Amjad Shhadeh, Michael Alterman, Nardy Casap
{"title":"髁突增生的术后结果:比例髁突切除术与正颌手术。","authors":"Adir Cohen, Heli Rushinek, Amjad Shhadeh, Michael Alterman, Nardy Casap","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of patients with facial asymmetry caused by condylar hyperplasia remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study compared active patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) who underwent proportional condylectomy with ceased patients with UCH who underwent orthognathic surgery, evaluating esthetics, function, and satisfaction. The retrospective study included 2 groups: group A, with 15 active patients with UCH who underwent proportional condylectomy, and group B, with 22 ceased patients with UCH who underwent orthognathic surgery. Facial, occlusal, and skeletal changes were analyzed using photographic and radiologic records, along with a satisfaction questionnaire. Both groups showed significant improvements. Group A's chin deviation, dental midline, and occlusal plane canting improved by 58.5% (P < 0.001), 56.5% (P < 0.001), and 70.0% (P < 0.001), respectively. Group B's corresponding improvements were 60.1% (P < 0.001), 79.4% (P < 0.001), and 64.9% (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was high in both groups, without significant differences in postoperative results, esthetics, and functional satisfaction. In conclusion, Proportional condylectomy for UCH achieves comparable outcomes with orthognathic surgery in facial, occlusal, and skeletal improvements and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Outcomes in Condylar Hyperplasia: Proportional Condylectomy Versus Orthognathic Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Adir Cohen, Heli Rushinek, Amjad Shhadeh, Michael Alterman, Nardy Casap\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of patients with facial asymmetry caused by condylar hyperplasia remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study compared active patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) who underwent proportional condylectomy with ceased patients with UCH who underwent orthognathic surgery, evaluating esthetics, function, and satisfaction. The retrospective study included 2 groups: group A, with 15 active patients with UCH who underwent proportional condylectomy, and group B, with 22 ceased patients with UCH who underwent orthognathic surgery. Facial, occlusal, and skeletal changes were analyzed using photographic and radiologic records, along with a satisfaction questionnaire. Both groups showed significant improvements. Group A's chin deviation, dental midline, and occlusal plane canting improved by 58.5% (P < 0.001), 56.5% (P < 0.001), and 70.0% (P < 0.001), respectively. Group B's corresponding improvements were 60.1% (P < 0.001), 79.4% (P < 0.001), and 64.9% (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was high in both groups, without significant differences in postoperative results, esthetics, and functional satisfaction. In conclusion, Proportional condylectomy for UCH achieves comparable outcomes with orthognathic surgery in facial, occlusal, and skeletal improvements and patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由髁突增生引起的面部不对称患者的处理仍然是一个持续争论的主题。本研究比较了活动期单侧髁突增生(UCH)患者行比例髁突切除术和停息期单侧髁突增生患者行正颌手术,评估美学、功能和满意度。回顾性研究包括2组:A组15例活动期UCH患者行比例髁突切除术,B组22例活动期UCH患者行正颌手术。面部,咬合和骨骼变化分析使用照片和放射记录,以及满意度问卷。两组均有显著改善。A组的下颌偏度、牙中线和咬合平面倾斜分别改善了58.5% (P < 0.001)、56.5% (P < 0.001)和70.0% (P < 0.001)。B组相应改善率分别为60.1% (P < 0.001)、79.4% (P < 0.001)、64.9% (P < 0.001)。两组患者满意度均较高,在术后结果、美学和功能满意度方面无显著差异。总之,比例髁突切除术治疗UCH在面部、咬合、骨骼改善和患者满意度方面与正颌手术效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative Outcomes in Condylar Hyperplasia: Proportional Condylectomy Versus Orthognathic Surgery.

The management of patients with facial asymmetry caused by condylar hyperplasia remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study compared active patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) who underwent proportional condylectomy with ceased patients with UCH who underwent orthognathic surgery, evaluating esthetics, function, and satisfaction. The retrospective study included 2 groups: group A, with 15 active patients with UCH who underwent proportional condylectomy, and group B, with 22 ceased patients with UCH who underwent orthognathic surgery. Facial, occlusal, and skeletal changes were analyzed using photographic and radiologic records, along with a satisfaction questionnaire. Both groups showed significant improvements. Group A's chin deviation, dental midline, and occlusal plane canting improved by 58.5% (P < 0.001), 56.5% (P < 0.001), and 70.0% (P < 0.001), respectively. Group B's corresponding improvements were 60.1% (P < 0.001), 79.4% (P < 0.001), and 64.9% (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was high in both groups, without significant differences in postoperative results, esthetics, and functional satisfaction. In conclusion, Proportional condylectomy for UCH achieves comparable outcomes with orthognathic surgery in facial, occlusal, and skeletal improvements and patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Application of Anterolateral Thigh Chimeric Flap in Reconstruction of Orbitomaxillary Defects. 3D Deep Learning for Virtual Orbital Defect Reconstruction: A Precise and Automated Approach. Comparing the Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Alveolar Cleft Repair With 2 Different Materials-An Innovative Questionnaire Study. Estimation of Vitreous Chamber Volume Using Axial Length Measurements. Nonsurgical Correction of Deviated Nose Using Hyaluronic Acid Fillers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1