传统注射器与伪装注射器和振动辅助注射器对儿童局麻疼痛和恐惧感知的比较:一项裂口随机对照试验。

Q3 Dentistry International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2993
Nehal Ahmad, Mahendra K Jindal, Neha Agrawal, Pranshu Varshney
{"title":"传统注射器与伪装注射器和振动辅助注射器对儿童局麻疼痛和恐惧感知的比较:一项裂口随机对照试验。","authors":"Nehal Ahmad, Mahendra K Jindal, Neha Agrawal, Pranshu Varshney","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>Although local anesthesia (LA) eliminates pain and instills a positive dental attitude, the physical appearance of its syringe is highly fear provoking and often intolerable. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the pain and fear perception in camouflaged syringe (CS) and vibration-assisted syringe (VA) when compared with conventional syringe and with each other (VACS) during local anesthetic administration in pediatric patients aged between 6 and 12 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-five subjects were randomly assigned into three groups: CS group (<i>n</i> = 7), VA group (<i>n</i> = 26), and VACS group (<i>n</i> = 27). Physiological and psychometric scale readings were noted before and after injection. The primary outcome was to assess the change in patients' fear and pain levels using CS and VA vs conventional injection techniques, using the above scales. The secondary outcome was to learn the preference for a particular injection technique by the subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the changes seen in the physiological and psychometric scales, pain and fear control was better in CS in the CS group (<i>p</i> < 0.00 for heart rate, VAS, and SEM score), vibration-assisted syringe in the VA group (<i>p</i> < 0.00 for VAS and SEM score), and vibration-assisted syringe in the VACS group (<i>p</i> < 0.00 for VAS score). The majority preference was CS in the CS group (64%), vibration-assisted syringe in the VA group (60%), and CS in the VACS group (52%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VA followed by CS is better than the conventional syringe in terms of reducing pain and fear perceived during LA administration. Children preferred CS over VA or the conventional syringe.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Children's disruptive behavior due to dental fear and pain often results in difficulty in providing effective dental treatment, which is frequently caused by the syringe used in LA delivery. Thus, techniques used to minimize this fear and pain are essential to provide safe, efficient, and quality dental care to children.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2023/11/059505).</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Ahmad N, Jindal MK, Agrawal N, <i>et al.</i> Comparison of Conventional Syringe with Camouflaged Syringe and Vibration-assisted Syringe for Pain and Fear Perception during Local Anesthetic Administration in Children: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1241-1247.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 11","pages":"1241-1247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Conventional Syringe with Camouflaged Syringe and Vibration-assisted Syringe for Pain and Fear Perception during Local Anesthetic Administration in Children: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nehal Ahmad, Mahendra K Jindal, Neha Agrawal, Pranshu Varshney\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>Although local anesthesia (LA) eliminates pain and instills a positive dental attitude, the physical appearance of its syringe is highly fear provoking and often intolerable. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the pain and fear perception in camouflaged syringe (CS) and vibration-assisted syringe (VA) when compared with conventional syringe and with each other (VACS) during local anesthetic administration in pediatric patients aged between 6 and 12 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-five subjects were randomly assigned into three groups: CS group (<i>n</i> = 7), VA group (<i>n</i> = 26), and VACS group (<i>n</i> = 27). Physiological and psychometric scale readings were noted before and after injection. The primary outcome was to assess the change in patients' fear and pain levels using CS and VA vs conventional injection techniques, using the above scales. The secondary outcome was to learn the preference for a particular injection technique by the subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the changes seen in the physiological and psychometric scales, pain and fear control was better in CS in the CS group (<i>p</i> < 0.00 for heart rate, VAS, and SEM score), vibration-assisted syringe in the VA group (<i>p</i> < 0.00 for VAS and SEM score), and vibration-assisted syringe in the VACS group (<i>p</i> < 0.00 for VAS score). The majority preference was CS in the CS group (64%), vibration-assisted syringe in the VA group (60%), and CS in the VACS group (52%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VA followed by CS is better than the conventional syringe in terms of reducing pain and fear perceived during LA administration. Children preferred CS over VA or the conventional syringe.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Children's disruptive behavior due to dental fear and pain often results in difficulty in providing effective dental treatment, which is frequently caused by the syringe used in LA delivery. Thus, techniques used to minimize this fear and pain are essential to provide safe, efficient, and quality dental care to children.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2023/11/059505).</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Ahmad N, Jindal MK, Agrawal N, <i>et al.</i> Comparison of Conventional Syringe with Camouflaged Syringe and Vibration-assisted Syringe for Pain and Fear Perception during Local Anesthetic Administration in Children: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1241-1247.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 11\",\"pages\":\"1241-1247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和背景:虽然局部麻醉(LA)消除疼痛并灌输积极的牙科态度,但其注射器的物理外观是高度令人恐惧的,往往是难以忍受的。因此,本研究的目的是评估伪装注射器(CS)和振动辅助注射器(VA)与传统注射器(VACS)在6 ~ 12岁儿童局麻给药过程中的疼痛和恐惧感知。材料与方法:85例受试者随机分为3组:CS组(n = 7)、VA组(n = 26)、VACS组(n = 27)。记录注射前后生理、心理量表读数。主要结果是评估使用CS和VA与传统注射技术相比患者恐惧和疼痛水平的变化,使用上述量表。次要结果是了解受试者对特定注射技术的偏好。结果:从生理和心理测量量表的变化来看,CS组(心率、VAS和SEM评分p < 0.00)、VA组(VAS和SEM评分p < 0.00)和VACS组(VAS评分p < 0.00)的疼痛和恐惧控制较好。CS组(64%)、VA组(60%)和VACS组(52%)的首选是CS。结论:在减少给药过程中的疼痛和恐惧方面,静脉注射后静脉注射优于常规注射器。与VA或传统注射器相比,儿童更喜欢CS。临床意义:儿童因牙科恐惧和疼痛而产生的破坏性行为往往导致难以提供有效的牙科治疗,这通常是由LA分娩时使用的注射器引起的。因此,减少这种恐惧和痛苦的技术对于为儿童提供安全、有效和高质量的牙科护理至关重要。试验注册:该试验已在印度临床试验注册中心注册(CTRI/2023/11/059505)。如何引用本文:Ahmad N, Jindal MK, Agrawal N等。传统注射器与伪装注射器和振动辅助注射器对儿童局麻疼痛和恐惧感知的比较:一项裂口随机对照试验。中华临床儿科杂志;2017;17(11):1241-1247。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Conventional Syringe with Camouflaged Syringe and Vibration-assisted Syringe for Pain and Fear Perception during Local Anesthetic Administration in Children: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial.

Aim and background: Although local anesthesia (LA) eliminates pain and instills a positive dental attitude, the physical appearance of its syringe is highly fear provoking and often intolerable. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the pain and fear perception in camouflaged syringe (CS) and vibration-assisted syringe (VA) when compared with conventional syringe and with each other (VACS) during local anesthetic administration in pediatric patients aged between 6 and 12 years.

Materials and methods: Eighty-five subjects were randomly assigned into three groups: CS group (n = 7), VA group (n = 26), and VACS group (n = 27). Physiological and psychometric scale readings were noted before and after injection. The primary outcome was to assess the change in patients' fear and pain levels using CS and VA vs conventional injection techniques, using the above scales. The secondary outcome was to learn the preference for a particular injection technique by the subjects.

Results: Based on the changes seen in the physiological and psychometric scales, pain and fear control was better in CS in the CS group (p < 0.00 for heart rate, VAS, and SEM score), vibration-assisted syringe in the VA group (p < 0.00 for VAS and SEM score), and vibration-assisted syringe in the VACS group (p < 0.00 for VAS score). The majority preference was CS in the CS group (64%), vibration-assisted syringe in the VA group (60%), and CS in the VACS group (52%).

Conclusion: VA followed by CS is better than the conventional syringe in terms of reducing pain and fear perceived during LA administration. Children preferred CS over VA or the conventional syringe.

Clinical significance: Children's disruptive behavior due to dental fear and pain often results in difficulty in providing effective dental treatment, which is frequently caused by the syringe used in LA delivery. Thus, techniques used to minimize this fear and pain are essential to provide safe, efficient, and quality dental care to children.

Trial registration: The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2023/11/059505).

How to cite this article: Ahmad N, Jindal MK, Agrawal N, et al. Comparison of Conventional Syringe with Camouflaged Syringe and Vibration-assisted Syringe for Pain and Fear Perception during Local Anesthetic Administration in Children: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1241-1247.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Digital Intraoral Scans Three-dimensional Surface Analysis Compared with Plaster Models Dental Measurement in Mixed Dentition. A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Modeling Videos on Dental Anxiety of 3-6-year-old Children Requiring Treatment under Local Anesthesia: A Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial. An In Vivo Comparative Analysis of Pain Perception in Children Following Lidocaine Gel, Clove Oil, and Precooling for Intraoral Injections: A Pilot Study. An In Vivo Evaluation of Changes in Salivary pH in 3-9-year-old Children Using Chewing Gums (Xylitol) and Lollipops (Xylitol + Erythritol). Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation between Conventional Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Gel-based Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Indirect Pulp Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1