主要饮食质量评分(PDQS)对爱尔兰岛有心血管疾病风险的成年人四天食物日记的有效性和可重复性

IF 2.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Nutritional Science Pub Date : 2024-08-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/jns.2024.23
Sarah F Brennan, Rebecca Finlay, Marina Ferrari, Chris R Cardwell, Lorraine Brennan, Jayne V Woodside
{"title":"主要饮食质量评分(PDQS)对爱尔兰岛有心血管疾病风险的成年人四天食物日记的有效性和可重复性","authors":"Sarah F Brennan, Rebecca Finlay, Marina Ferrari, Chris R Cardwell, Lorraine Brennan, Jayne V Woodside","doi":"10.1017/jns.2024.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an increasing need for valid, rapid diet screening tools. A significant association between the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS) and reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been demonstrated in the US but evidence of its use in Europe is lacking. The aim of this study was to amend the PDQS for a UK/Irish population and determine validity and reliability in those at risk of CVD. Participants were recruited via online adverts across the island of Ireland. The PDQS was amended for a UK/Irish population and participants completed PDQS and reference measure (4-day food diary (FD)) on two occasions. PDQS score was calculated directly from PDQS and indirectly from FDs. Validity was determined using Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) (<i>r</i>), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted kappa. Reliability was determined using SCCs (<i>r</i>), ICCs, weighted kappa and coefficient of variation. 'Data were available for n = 115 (Month 0) and n = 108 (Month 3) participants for validity and n = 110 for reliability assessment (PDQS completed at both timepoints)'. PDQS score from PDQS was significantly correlated with PDQS score from FDs at months 0 (<i>r</i> = 0.59, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and 3 (<i>r</i> = 0.65, <i>P</i> < 0.01), with similar associations observed via ICCs. Weighted kappa indicated moderate agreement. PDQS score at month 0 was significantly correlated with PDQS score at month 3 (<i>r</i> = 0.78, <i>P</i> < 0.01), with similar associations observed via ICCs. Weighted kappa indicated moderate agreement. Results indicate that the amended PDQS is a valid and reliable tool to determine diet quality in a UK/Irish population at risk of CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutritional Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reproducibility of the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS) against a four-day food diary in adults at risk of cardiovascular disease on the island of Ireland.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah F Brennan, Rebecca Finlay, Marina Ferrari, Chris R Cardwell, Lorraine Brennan, Jayne V Woodside\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jns.2024.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is an increasing need for valid, rapid diet screening tools. A significant association between the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS) and reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been demonstrated in the US but evidence of its use in Europe is lacking. The aim of this study was to amend the PDQS for a UK/Irish population and determine validity and reliability in those at risk of CVD. Participants were recruited via online adverts across the island of Ireland. The PDQS was amended for a UK/Irish population and participants completed PDQS and reference measure (4-day food diary (FD)) on two occasions. PDQS score was calculated directly from PDQS and indirectly from FDs. Validity was determined using Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) (<i>r</i>), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted kappa. Reliability was determined using SCCs (<i>r</i>), ICCs, weighted kappa and coefficient of variation. 'Data were available for n = 115 (Month 0) and n = 108 (Month 3) participants for validity and n = 110 for reliability assessment (PDQS completed at both timepoints)'. PDQS score from PDQS was significantly correlated with PDQS score from FDs at months 0 (<i>r</i> = 0.59, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and 3 (<i>r</i> = 0.65, <i>P</i> < 0.01), with similar associations observed via ICCs. Weighted kappa indicated moderate agreement. PDQS score at month 0 was significantly correlated with PDQS score at month 3 (<i>r</i> = 0.78, <i>P</i> < 0.01), with similar associations observed via ICCs. Weighted kappa indicated moderate agreement. Results indicate that the amended PDQS is a valid and reliable tool to determine diet quality in a UK/Irish population at risk of CVD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutritional Science\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutritional Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2024.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutritional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2024.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们越来越需要有效、快速的饮食筛查工具。优质饮食质量评分(PDQS)与降低心血管疾病(CVD)风险之间的显著关联已在美国得到证实,但在欧洲缺乏其使用的证据。本研究的目的是修订英国/爱尔兰人群的PDQS,并确定心血管疾病风险人群的有效性和可靠性。参与者是通过爱尔兰岛各地的在线广告招募的。对英国/爱尔兰人群的PDQS进行了修订,参与者两次完成PDQS和参考测量(4天食物日记(FD))。PDQS评分由PDQS直接计算,FDs间接计算。采用Spearman相关系数(SCCs) (r)、类内相关系数(ICCs)和加权kappa来确定效度。采用SCCs (r)、ICCs、加权kappa和变异系数确定信度。“n = 115(第0个月)和n = 108(第3个月)参与者的有效性数据和n = 110的可靠性评估数据(PDQS在两个时间点完成)”。PDQS评分与FDs评分在第0个月(r = 0.59, P < 0.01)和第3个月(r = 0.65, P < 0.01)呈极显著相关,通过ICCs观察到相似的相关性。加权kappa表示中度一致。第0个月的PDQS评分与第3个月的PDQS评分显著相关(r = 0.78, P < 0.01),通过ICCs观察到类似的相关性。加权kappa表示中度一致。结果表明,修订后的PDQS是确定英国/爱尔兰心血管疾病风险人群饮食质量的有效可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reproducibility of the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS) against a four-day food diary in adults at risk of cardiovascular disease on the island of Ireland.

There is an increasing need for valid, rapid diet screening tools. A significant association between the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS) and reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been demonstrated in the US but evidence of its use in Europe is lacking. The aim of this study was to amend the PDQS for a UK/Irish population and determine validity and reliability in those at risk of CVD. Participants were recruited via online adverts across the island of Ireland. The PDQS was amended for a UK/Irish population and participants completed PDQS and reference measure (4-day food diary (FD)) on two occasions. PDQS score was calculated directly from PDQS and indirectly from FDs. Validity was determined using Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) (r), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted kappa. Reliability was determined using SCCs (r), ICCs, weighted kappa and coefficient of variation. 'Data were available for n = 115 (Month 0) and n = 108 (Month 3) participants for validity and n = 110 for reliability assessment (PDQS completed at both timepoints)'. PDQS score from PDQS was significantly correlated with PDQS score from FDs at months 0 (r = 0.59, P < 0.01) and 3 (r = 0.65, P < 0.01), with similar associations observed via ICCs. Weighted kappa indicated moderate agreement. PDQS score at month 0 was significantly correlated with PDQS score at month 3 (r = 0.78, P < 0.01), with similar associations observed via ICCs. Weighted kappa indicated moderate agreement. Results indicate that the amended PDQS is a valid and reliable tool to determine diet quality in a UK/Irish population at risk of CVD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutritional Science
Journal of Nutritional Science NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nutritional Science is an international, peer-reviewed, online only, open access journal that welcomes high-quality research articles in all aspects of nutrition. The underlying aim of all work should be, as far as possible, to develop nutritional concepts. JNS encompasses the full spectrum of nutritional science including public health nutrition, epidemiology, dietary surveys, nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, appetite, obesity, ageing, endocrinology, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics, molecular and cellular biology and nutrigenomics. JNS welcomes Primary Research Papers, Brief Reports, Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Workshop Reports, Letters to the Editor and Obituaries.
期刊最新文献
Diet diversity score might be associated with reproductive health in women and infant outcomes: a systematic review. The relationship between temperament with nutritional status and anthropometric measurements in adult individuals. Effectiveness of the 'Weet wat je eet' nutrition education programme in Dutch secondary schools. A diet-wide association study for liver cancer risk: findings from a prospective cohort study in Chinese women. Associations of renal sinus fat with metabolic parameters, abdominal visceral adipose tissue, metabolic syndrome, fructose intake, and blood pressure control in obese individuals with hypertension: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1