使用人为因素方法对护士执业监管评估在线平台进行批判性审查。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001230
Danica Tuden, Alison Wainwright, Aditya Sharma
{"title":"使用人为因素方法对护士执业监管评估在线平台进行批判性审查。","authors":"Danica Tuden, Alison Wainwright, Aditya Sharma","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using human factors approaches such as usability and usefulness in the evaluation of computerized information systems is key to the successful adoption for end users. Usability is associated with measuring the ease of use of a system, whereas usefulness is concerned with the accuracy and currency of the system content. At the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives, the nurse practitioner peer review incorporates the use of an online platform as part of the assessment process. The technology within this system has experienced challenges since its original deployment in 2012, particularly from an end user perspective. As such, it was important to conduct an evaluation in order to clearly identify the issues and develop recommendations and requirements for enhancements and improvements. A recognized usability evaluation methodology was selected including usability inspection as well as usability testing to ensure a thorough and comprehensive approach to this work. This approach proved highly effective in uncovering system issues within the regulatory health professions domain. Overall, usability evaluation methods were integral to meeting the objectives of this article and in demonstrating the value of applying human factors approaches in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying a Critical Review of an Online Platform for Nurse Practitioner Regulatory Assessment Using a Human Factors Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Danica Tuden, Alison Wainwright, Aditya Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using human factors approaches such as usability and usefulness in the evaluation of computerized information systems is key to the successful adoption for end users. Usability is associated with measuring the ease of use of a system, whereas usefulness is concerned with the accuracy and currency of the system content. At the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives, the nurse practitioner peer review incorporates the use of an online platform as part of the assessment process. The technology within this system has experienced challenges since its original deployment in 2012, particularly from an end user perspective. As such, it was important to conduct an evaluation in order to clearly identify the issues and develop recommendations and requirements for enhancements and improvements. A recognized usability evaluation methodology was selected including usability inspection as well as usability testing to ensure a thorough and comprehensive approach to this work. This approach proved highly effective in uncovering system issues within the regulatory health professions domain. Overall, usability evaluation methods were integral to meeting the objectives of this article and in demonstrating the value of applying human factors approaches in this context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001230\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在计算机化信息系统的评估中使用诸如可用性和有用性等人为因素方法是最终用户成功采用的关键。可用性与度量系统的易用性有关,而有用性则与系统内容的准确性和流通性有关。在不列颠哥伦比亚省护士和助产士学院,执业护士同行评议将使用在线平台作为评估过程的一部分。自2012年首次部署以来,该系统中的技术经历了许多挑战,特别是从最终用户的角度来看。因此,重要的是进行评估,以便清楚地确定问题,并为改进和改进提出建议和要求。选择了公认的可用性评估方法,包括可用性检查和可用性测试,以确保对这项工作采取彻底和全面的方法。事实证明,这种方法在发现监管卫生专业领域的系统问题方面非常有效。总的来说,可用性评估方法对于满足本文的目标和演示在此上下文中应用人为因素方法的价值是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying a Critical Review of an Online Platform for Nurse Practitioner Regulatory Assessment Using a Human Factors Approach.

Using human factors approaches such as usability and usefulness in the evaluation of computerized information systems is key to the successful adoption for end users. Usability is associated with measuring the ease of use of a system, whereas usefulness is concerned with the accuracy and currency of the system content. At the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives, the nurse practitioner peer review incorporates the use of an online platform as part of the assessment process. The technology within this system has experienced challenges since its original deployment in 2012, particularly from an end user perspective. As such, it was important to conduct an evaluation in order to clearly identify the issues and develop recommendations and requirements for enhancements and improvements. A recognized usability evaluation methodology was selected including usability inspection as well as usability testing to ensure a thorough and comprehensive approach to this work. This approach proved highly effective in uncovering system issues within the regulatory health professions domain. Overall, usability evaluation methods were integral to meeting the objectives of this article and in demonstrating the value of applying human factors approaches in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sectional Analysis of Zoom Fatigue on Clinical Decision-making in Nursing Students. The Effect of Game-Based Technology on Undergraduate Nursing Students' Knowledge and Motivation: Mixed-Methods Study. A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Nurse Burnout and Satisfaction With the Electronic Health Record. A Phased Competency Model for Electronic Health Record Usability. Development and Pilot Testing of a Mobile App-Based Chatbot for the Self-management of Physical Activity for Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1