医疗保健专业人员对英国商业配方奶粉营销的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Archives of Disease in Childhood Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2024-327706
Eilidh McNaughton, Lydia Chen, Andrea D Smith, Rana Conway
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员对英国商业配方奶粉营销的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Eilidh McNaughton, Lydia Chen, Andrea D Smith, Rana Conway","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand (1) healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions and experiences of commercial milk formula (CMF) marketing to consumers and HCPs and (2) HCPs' perspectives on regulation of CMF marketing.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>UK.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In-person and online interviews with 41 HCPs with regular contact with pregnant women and mothers. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted from October 2019 to March 2021, focusing on experiences of CMF marketing and perceptions of legislation. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were developed: (1) '<i>Industry relationships have changed and not disappeared'-</i>some HCPs reported contact with industry ceasing due to the Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) but contact with HCPs in other roles was believed to have increased; (2) '<i>Direct-to-consumer marketing presents challenges for HCPs'</i>-to support women to make informed choices about infant feeding, HCPs felt they had to challenge misinformation families receive from the CMF industry; (3) '<i>System changes are needed to support informed infant feeding decisions'</i>-HCPs wanted policy changes, including effective legislation to restrict CMF marketing to both HCPs and families. They also felt initiatives to normalise breastfeeding were important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduced contact with CMF representatives was reported by HCPs covered by the BFI but continued or increased contact was seen with other HCPs. HCPs believed CMF marketing impacted women's beliefs about infant feeding and they had to work hard to provide a balanced perspective. HCPs wanted stricter regulation of CMF marketing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare professionals' perspectives on commercial milk formula marketing in the UK: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Eilidh McNaughton, Lydia Chen, Andrea D Smith, Rana Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand (1) healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions and experiences of commercial milk formula (CMF) marketing to consumers and HCPs and (2) HCPs' perspectives on regulation of CMF marketing.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>UK.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In-person and online interviews with 41 HCPs with regular contact with pregnant women and mothers. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted from October 2019 to March 2021, focusing on experiences of CMF marketing and perceptions of legislation. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were developed: (1) '<i>Industry relationships have changed and not disappeared'-</i>some HCPs reported contact with industry ceasing due to the Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) but contact with HCPs in other roles was believed to have increased; (2) '<i>Direct-to-consumer marketing presents challenges for HCPs'</i>-to support women to make informed choices about infant feeding, HCPs felt they had to challenge misinformation families receive from the CMF industry; (3) '<i>System changes are needed to support informed infant feeding decisions'</i>-HCPs wanted policy changes, including effective legislation to restrict CMF marketing to both HCPs and families. They also felt initiatives to normalise breastfeeding were important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduced contact with CMF representatives was reported by HCPs covered by the BFI but continued or increased contact was seen with other HCPs. HCPs believed CMF marketing impacted women's beliefs about infant feeding and they had to work hard to provide a balanced perspective. HCPs wanted stricter regulation of CMF marketing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327706\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解(1)医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对商业配方奶粉(CMF)向消费者和HCPs营销的看法和经验;(2)HCPs对CMF营销监管的看法。设置:英国。设计:对41名定期与孕妇和母亲接触的医护人员进行面对面和在线访谈。从2019年10月到2021年3月进行了个人半结构化访谈,重点是CMF营销的经验和对立法的看法。数据分析采用反身性主题分析。结果:开发了三个主题:(1)“行业关系已经改变,而不是消失”——一些医护人员报告说,由于“爱婴行动”(BFI),他们与行业的联系已经停止,但与其他角色的医护人员的联系据信有所增加;(2)“直接面向消费者的营销给医疗保健提供者带来了挑战”——为了支持妇女在婴儿喂养方面做出明智的选择,医疗保健提供者认为他们必须挑战家庭从CMF行业获得的错误信息;(3)“需要改变制度,以支持知情的婴儿喂养决定”——卫生保健提供者希望改变政策,包括有效立法,限制CMF向卫生保健提供者和家庭销售。他们还认为,使母乳喂养正常化的举措很重要。结论:BFI覆盖的HCPs报告与CMF代表的接触减少,但与其他HCPs的接触持续或增加。HCPs认为CMF营销影响了妇女对婴儿喂养的看法,他们必须努力提供一个平衡的观点。HCPs希望对CMF的营销进行更严格的监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on commercial milk formula marketing in the UK: a qualitative study.

Objectives: To understand (1) healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions and experiences of commercial milk formula (CMF) marketing to consumers and HCPs and (2) HCPs' perspectives on regulation of CMF marketing.

Setting: UK.

Design: In-person and online interviews with 41 HCPs with regular contact with pregnant women and mothers. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted from October 2019 to March 2021, focusing on experiences of CMF marketing and perceptions of legislation. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were developed: (1) 'Industry relationships have changed and not disappeared'-some HCPs reported contact with industry ceasing due to the Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) but contact with HCPs in other roles was believed to have increased; (2) 'Direct-to-consumer marketing presents challenges for HCPs'-to support women to make informed choices about infant feeding, HCPs felt they had to challenge misinformation families receive from the CMF industry; (3) 'System changes are needed to support informed infant feeding decisions'-HCPs wanted policy changes, including effective legislation to restrict CMF marketing to both HCPs and families. They also felt initiatives to normalise breastfeeding were important.

Conclusions: Reduced contact with CMF representatives was reported by HCPs covered by the BFI but continued or increased contact was seen with other HCPs. HCPs believed CMF marketing impacted women's beliefs about infant feeding and they had to work hard to provide a balanced perspective. HCPs wanted stricter regulation of CMF marketing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
期刊最新文献
How can parents' experience of child death reviews be improved? Gender affirming hormone therapy for individuals with gender dysphoria aged <26 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood folate level needed for fully effective fortification in the prevention of neural tube defects. Severe accidental poisonings in children: a British Paediatric Surveillance Unit nationwide prospective study. Topical analgesia during needle-related procedures in children: a clinical practice guideline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1