托德有助于地铁车站客流量从COVID-19早期恢复的?来自南京的经验证据

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104107
Ming Yin, Yuqi Fan, Yu Wang
{"title":"托德有助于地铁车站客流量从COVID-19早期恢复的?来自南京的经验证据","authors":"Ming Yin, Yuqi Fan, Yu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TOD-ness, defined as the extent to which the existing conditions of TOD sites align with established TOD standards, has been shown in previous studies to have a significant correlation with metro station ridership. This paper utilizes the LightGBM model to investigate the relationship between TOD-ness and the “early recovery” of metro station ridership following the lifting of COVID-19 control measures. The study findings show: (1) At the line level, metro ridership in Nanjing has significantly rebounded following the lifting of COVID-19 control measures, particularly for non-commuting and weekend travel. At the station level, external transport hubs and major city center stations experienced the most notable recovery in ridership, while secondary urban center stations saw relatively higher increases in weekend ridership. (2) In terms of TOD-ness typology, stations with higher overall indicators and node indicators exhibited a greater number of ridership recoveries. (3) Regarding the relative importance of different indicators, factors related to place and design—such as functional mix, road network density, POI density of residences, and pedestrian shed ratio—are the more important drivers of ridership recovery for both commuting and non-commuting purposes. However, non-commuting ridership recovery is more influenced by station location and functional diversity, whereas commuting ridership recovery is more closely associated with ease of access.","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can TOD help metro station ridership ‘early recovery’ from COVID-19? An empirical evidence from Nanjing\",\"authors\":\"Ming Yin, Yuqi Fan, Yu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TOD-ness, defined as the extent to which the existing conditions of TOD sites align with established TOD standards, has been shown in previous studies to have a significant correlation with metro station ridership. This paper utilizes the LightGBM model to investigate the relationship between TOD-ness and the “early recovery” of metro station ridership following the lifting of COVID-19 control measures. The study findings show: (1) At the line level, metro ridership in Nanjing has significantly rebounded following the lifting of COVID-19 control measures, particularly for non-commuting and weekend travel. At the station level, external transport hubs and major city center stations experienced the most notable recovery in ridership, while secondary urban center stations saw relatively higher increases in weekend ridership. (2) In terms of TOD-ness typology, stations with higher overall indicators and node indicators exhibited a greater number of ridership recoveries. (3) Regarding the relative importance of different indicators, factors related to place and design—such as functional mix, road network density, POI density of residences, and pedestrian shed ratio—are the more important drivers of ridership recovery for both commuting and non-commuting purposes. However, non-commuting ridership recovery is more influenced by station location and functional diversity, whereas commuting ridership recovery is more closely associated with ease of access.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104107\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

TOD-ness 是指 TOD 站点的现有条件符合既定 TOD 标准的程度,以往的研究表明,TOD-ness 与地铁站乘客量有显著的相关性。本文利用 LightGBM 模型研究了 TOD 与 COVID-19 控制措施解除后地铁站乘客量 "早期恢复 "之间的关系。研究结果表明:(1) 在线路层面,COVID-19 管制措施解除后,南京地铁客流明显回升,尤其是非通勤客流和周末客流。在车站层面,对外交通枢纽和主要城市中心站的乘客量回升最为明显,而城市副中心站周末乘客量的增幅相对较高。(2)从 TOD 的类型来看,综合指标和节点指标较高的车站乘客量恢复的数量较多。(3) 就不同指标的相对重要性而言,与地点和设计相关的因素,如功能组合、路网密度、住宅 POI 密度和步行棚比例,是通勤和非通勤乘客量恢复的更重要驱动因素。然而,非通勤乘客量的恢复受车站位置和功能多样性的影响更大,而通勤乘客量的恢复与交通便利性的关系更为密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can TOD help metro station ridership ‘early recovery’ from COVID-19? An empirical evidence from Nanjing
TOD-ness, defined as the extent to which the existing conditions of TOD sites align with established TOD standards, has been shown in previous studies to have a significant correlation with metro station ridership. This paper utilizes the LightGBM model to investigate the relationship between TOD-ness and the “early recovery” of metro station ridership following the lifting of COVID-19 control measures. The study findings show: (1) At the line level, metro ridership in Nanjing has significantly rebounded following the lifting of COVID-19 control measures, particularly for non-commuting and weekend travel. At the station level, external transport hubs and major city center stations experienced the most notable recovery in ridership, while secondary urban center stations saw relatively higher increases in weekend ridership. (2) In terms of TOD-ness typology, stations with higher overall indicators and node indicators exhibited a greater number of ridership recoveries. (3) Regarding the relative importance of different indicators, factors related to place and design—such as functional mix, road network density, POI density of residences, and pedestrian shed ratio—are the more important drivers of ridership recovery for both commuting and non-commuting purposes. However, non-commuting ridership recovery is more influenced by station location and functional diversity, whereas commuting ridership recovery is more closely associated with ease of access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
期刊最新文献
Trip generation dynamics under the introduction of shared mobility Unveiling inequalities: The intersection of gender and income in accessibility in Curitiba, Brazil Understanding inequalities in geographic accessibility to emergency cyclone shelters in Bangladesh under climate change Changes in the distance of interprovincial coal transportation in China and its effect on carbon emissions Exploring the effect of new urban expressway on travel time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1