库里蒂巴城市河流政策:多层次分析和社区参与。

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1007/s00267-025-02109-1
Mario Prokopiuk, Altair Rosa, Paulo Nascimento Neto
{"title":"库里蒂巴城市河流政策:多层次分析和社区参与。","authors":"Mario Prokopiuk, Altair Rosa, Paulo Nascimento Neto","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02109-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates urban river policies, emphasizing the gaps in understanding the interactions between riverine communities and governance systems. Using empirical and theoretical methods, the research applies multivariate analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to data from a representative sample of 1740 residents of Curitiba. The study maintains a 95% confidence level with a ±2.4% margin of error. Latent social, governmental, responsive, and environmental engagement variables are analyzed, highlighting the complexity of urban policies and the necessity for adaptable strategies. The findings suggest that greater social and governmental engagement correlates with more favorable perceptions of river quality. In contrast, responsive engagement exhibits a weaker relationship, while environmental engagement underscores ongoing challenges. The research introduces a theoretical framework supported by an analytical model, advocating for urban policies that account for contextual specificities and encourage collaborative engagement between governments and communities. The study concludes that implementing comprehensive strategies within this integrated framework is crucial for sustaining and enhancing urban river ecosystems, as demonstrated by the case of the Belém River in Curitiba.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban River Policies: Multilevel Analysis and Community Engagement in Curitiba.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Prokopiuk, Altair Rosa, Paulo Nascimento Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-025-02109-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates urban river policies, emphasizing the gaps in understanding the interactions between riverine communities and governance systems. Using empirical and theoretical methods, the research applies multivariate analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to data from a representative sample of 1740 residents of Curitiba. The study maintains a 95% confidence level with a ±2.4% margin of error. Latent social, governmental, responsive, and environmental engagement variables are analyzed, highlighting the complexity of urban policies and the necessity for adaptable strategies. The findings suggest that greater social and governmental engagement correlates with more favorable perceptions of river quality. In contrast, responsive engagement exhibits a weaker relationship, while environmental engagement underscores ongoing challenges. The research introduces a theoretical framework supported by an analytical model, advocating for urban policies that account for contextual specificities and encourage collaborative engagement between governments and communities. The study concludes that implementing comprehensive strategies within this integrated framework is crucial for sustaining and enhancing urban river ecosystems, as demonstrated by the case of the Belém River in Curitiba.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02109-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02109-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了城市河流政策,强调了在理解河流社区和治理系统之间相互作用方面的差距。本研究采用实证和理论相结合的方法,对库里蒂巴1740名居民的代表性样本数据进行多元分析和结构方程模型(SEM)分析。该研究保持95%的置信水平,误差范围为±2.4%。分析了潜在的社会、政府、响应性和环境参与变量,强调了城市政策的复杂性和适应性战略的必要性。研究结果表明,更多的社会和政府参与与对河流质量的更有利的看法有关。相比之下,响应性参与表现出较弱的关系,而环境参与则强调了持续的挑战。该研究引入了一个由分析模型支持的理论框架,倡导考虑环境特殊性的城市政策,并鼓励政府和社区之间的合作参与。该研究的结论是,在这一综合框架内实施综合战略对于维持和加强城市河流生态系统至关重要,库里蒂巴bel姆河的案例证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urban River Policies: Multilevel Analysis and Community Engagement in Curitiba.

This study investigates urban river policies, emphasizing the gaps in understanding the interactions between riverine communities and governance systems. Using empirical and theoretical methods, the research applies multivariate analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to data from a representative sample of 1740 residents of Curitiba. The study maintains a 95% confidence level with a ±2.4% margin of error. Latent social, governmental, responsive, and environmental engagement variables are analyzed, highlighting the complexity of urban policies and the necessity for adaptable strategies. The findings suggest that greater social and governmental engagement correlates with more favorable perceptions of river quality. In contrast, responsive engagement exhibits a weaker relationship, while environmental engagement underscores ongoing challenges. The research introduces a theoretical framework supported by an analytical model, advocating for urban policies that account for contextual specificities and encourage collaborative engagement between governments and communities. The study concludes that implementing comprehensive strategies within this integrated framework is crucial for sustaining and enhancing urban river ecosystems, as demonstrated by the case of the Belém River in Curitiba.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
期刊最新文献
The pending promises of mitigation measures in Environmental Impact Assessments: A typology and evaluation of Nepal's hydropower projects. A Policy Scan of Cumulative Effects Assessment in Support of Renewable Clean Growth Projects in Canada. An Appraisal of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Ethiopia: The Case of Mining Investments in the Benishangul-Gumuz Region. Narratives for Positive Nature Futures in Europe. Staying for food by urban birds: Insights from neural network analysis into adaptive strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1